The IMHE projection is really frightening for Sweden -- projecting right now they would need (middle, most likely updated estimate!)
2273 ICU beds but only have an initial ICU beds to begin with of
218. Look at that ratio.
Ten times.
But it was an accomplishment that New York state managed to
double their ICU beds.
New York state has just today announced a to-date preliminary rough death rate of
0.5% -- based on finding the actual infection rate in the state as a whole is going to be close to about 14% from their testing of 3,000 people around the state to determine overall state infections to date. (Note that this preliminary death rate of 0.5% will go up some, because for instance some of the counting of corona deaths, such as at home deaths, hasn't yet been done).
So, as some of us (well I know I did) had said weeks or a month or more ago here on CF things like 'if you can treat all of the people instead of having your hospitals overwhelmed, you can get a death rate down to something between 0.4%-0.7%' (rough paraphrase or conglomeration of the kind of posts I made a few times back in March).
But New York managed to treat everyone
without having a real overwhelm of hospitals like Italy.
If the hospitals get overwhelmed by too many cases at once then the death rate goes up sharply as it did in Wuhan and in northern Italy.
New York stay at home slowed the rate, and the hospitals haven't been overwhelmed to have patients dying in the hallways or at home to the extent of Italy (not nearly so much).
But, will Sweden manage to be able to treat so many cases at once they are lining up to have?
Well, they need an all-out push, at this point, but that would take better
awareness.
I wish the Swedish experiment was working out better! Maybe if they had made restaurants separate tables and limit indoor seating, and suggest to everyone explicitly to do more pickup and delivery, and if they had strongly recommended everyone to wear masks and such, sorta like we are doing now in New York state.