Dinosaurs would still be here.

[AV1611VET]

If you think there’s a word of god saying there really was a flood, you are wrong.

What's this then?

Genesis 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.

(Notice Who's speaking here? God is. That makes it a word of God saying there really [will be] a flood.)

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

It doesn't contradict anything.

We humans, sometimes get science wrong. That is a fact.
If human science contradicts the Word of God, then we know we are wrong.

You know what the problem with humanity is since Adam and Eve? We rely on ourselves and not on God. And then we cry about how God is bad because He allows evil in this world. Does not seem fair to me.

So why are you on a science forum then?

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

So why are you on a science forum then?

I know that I am on science forum. My point is, we have to learn to trust God over everyone else. So if someone says something that contradicts the Word of God, then we know that someone is incorrect. My desire is for all to come to God and trust His Word, because we all need a Saviour and God is our only hope.

Besides, the Bible teaches us a lot about science, about history. Some scientific discoveries came from studying the Bible. For example:
In 1984, Russell Humphreys correctly calculated the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune several years before the Voyager 2 satellite
would measure them. Humphreys used a vital clue from the Bible, that the universe was made only 6,000 years ago.
And when the surface of Venus was mapped in the mid-nineties, volcanoes, craters, mountains, and other features showed the history of the planet was young. Neptune is too hot to be old. Pluto still has nitrogen in its atmosphere. The rings of Saturn and Neptune aren't uniform, as they would be after millions of years. Both the density and magnetic field of Mercury cannot allow for millions of years.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I know that I am on science forum. My point is, we have to learn to trust God over everyone else. So if someone says something that contradicts the Word of God, then we know that someone is incorrect. My desire is for all to come to God and trust His Word, because we all need a Saviour and God is our only hope.

Besides, the Bible teaches us a lot about science, about history. Some scientific discoveries came from studying the Bible. For example:
In 1984, Russell Humphreys correctly calculated the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune several years before the Voyager 2 satellite
would measure them. Humphreys used a vital clue from the Bible, that the universe was made only 6,000 years ago.
And when the surface of Venus was mapped in the mid-nineties, volcanoes, craters, mountains, and other features showed the history of the planet was young. Neptune is too hot to be old. Pluto still has nitrogen in its atmosphere. The rings of Saturn and Neptune aren't uniform, as they would be after millions of years. Both the density and magnetic field of Mercury cannot allow for millions of years.

Wow. Not only did you not answer my question, but you also absolutely spouted things that are just flat out wrong.

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

If you think there’s a word of god saying there really
was a flood, you are wrong.

Genesis 6-9 describe the flood. Several other places in the Bible confirm this.

Many discoveries have already been made, that there indeed was a world-wide flood. Even without evidence we can trust the Word of God.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Genesis 6-9 describe the flood. Several other places in the Bible confirm this.

Many discoveries have already been made, that there indeed was a world-wide flood. Even without evidence we can trust the Word of God.

There was no global flood.

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

Not only did you not answer my question,

I did answer the question

but you also absolutely spouted things that are just flat out wrong.

What did I say that is wrong?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I did answer the question

I asked why are you on the science forum, and your response was "I know that I am on science forum." Your entire stance strikes me as being wholly antithetical to being on the science forum of any website.

What did I say that is wrong?

This:
"Besides, the Bible teaches us a lot about science, about history. Some scientific discoveries came from studying the Bible. For example:
In 1984, Russell Humphreys correctly calculated the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune several years before the Voyager 2 satellite
would measure them. Humphreys used a vital clue from the Bible, that the universe was made only 6,000 years ago.
And when the surface of Venus was mapped in the mid-nineties, volcanoes, craters, mountains, and other features showed the history of the planet was young. Neptune is too hot to be old. Pluto still has nitrogen in its atmosphere. The rings of Saturn and Neptune aren't uniform, as they would be after millions of years. Both the density and magnetic field of Mercury cannot allow for millions of years."

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

There was no global flood.

There is a lot of evidence that says otherwise.

Not that we need any evidence, the Word of God is enough.

 

[dlamberth]

Genesis 6-9 describe the flood. Several other places in the Bible confirm this.

Many discoveries have already been made, that there indeed was a world-wide flood. Even without evidence we can trust the Word of God.

The Earth itSelf is showing no Noah Flood.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

There is a lot of evidence that says otherwise.

Not that we need any evidence, the Word of God is enough.

It kind of isn't, since if the Bible says one thing, and then God's creation says something entirely the opposite, then something doesn't click.

 

[dlamberth]

There is a lot of evidence that says otherwise.

Not that we need any evidence, the Word of God is enough.

God's own Creation, as Created by God HimSelf shows no Global Flood evidence.

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

In 1984, Russell Humphreys correctly calculated the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune several years before the Voyager 2 satellite
would measure them. Humphreys used a vital clue from the Bible, that the universe was made only 6,000 years ago.

You can easily google did that Mr Humphreys in 1984 did correctly calculate the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune.

And when the surface of Venus was mapped in the mid-nineties, volcanoes, craters, mountains, and other features showed the history of the planet was young.

This is a fact also.

You accuse me of all these things being wrong while providing absolutely nothing why I'm wrong.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You can easily google did that Mr Humphreys in 1984 did correctly calculate the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune.

This is a fact also.

You accuse me of all these things being wrong while providing absolutely nothing why I'm wrong.

Why should I take the word of this Humphrey's over anything any other astronomer or scientist has said about the planets? All you're showing is confirmation bias.

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

God's own Creation, as Created by God HimSelf shows no Global Flood evidence.

Global Evidences of the Genesis Flood

This is a fantastic article on some of the evidence that supports Noah's flood.

Fossils are evidence of the death of all life during Noah's flood, and how all those things got buried. There are sea creatures on the tops of the Himalayas, the Alps, the Andes, the Rockies. How did they get up there?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Global Evidences of the Genesis Flood

This is a fantastic article on some of the evidence that supports Noah's flood.

Fossils are evidence of the death of all life during Noah's flood, and how all those things got buried. There are sea creatures on the tops of the Himalayas, the Alps, the Andes, the Rockies. How did they get up there?

Tell me you don't know basic geology or geography without saying you don't know basic geology or geography.

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

Why should I take the word of this Humphrey's over anything any other astronomer or scientist has said about the planets? All you're showing is confirmation bias.

I see you have absolutely no interest in having a discussion. All you are interested in calling me wrong without providing any sort of evidence to back you up. I'm no longer going to waste my time.

 

[Ivan Hlavanda]

Tell me you don't know basic geology or geography without saying you don't know basic geology or geography.

I have a better discussion with a flat Earther.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I see you have absolutely no interest in having a discussion. All you are interested in calling me wrong without providing any sort of evidence to back you up. I'm no longer going to waste my time.

You've never even posted anything to try and back up anything you've said. So it's a bit of pot calling kettle from both of us.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I have a better discussion with a flat Earther.

So have I.