Baggins
Yes these names were the ones who pushed forward, in these small circles, Huttons acceptance. Yet the first geologists were determined, even if some changed their mind, creationists with flood geology a part of it.
A few people were involved then and until modern times. It was hard to get paid to do geology until the present.
The years since has seen few competent researchers in these areas able to overcome their teachings as youths.
it is more substansive the opinions of so many people on the bible being the word of God and Genesis being true then the opinions of a few rock researchers relatively.
You brought up about questioning peoples competence.
Geology in its great conclusions does not employ the scientific method and so is just a study like history. Data and interpretation but no important testing.
it backed up by the fields organized authorities and not evidence in the field.
its not competent in its professionalism ultimately. Remembering its not doing true science but claiming too.
It doesn't show why rocks are not exactly what they are. Collected sediment,lava, by great collection events. No slow show needed.
The geologists here have not , too me, made good cases, or close, to the great conclusions of geology. We can always do as good or better in what was more likely the origin of this or that.
The merits of the case trump claims to authority in human discussion. Unless God is the authority.
We do have a chance here with several actual geologists to show the best proofs for geology confronting young earth claims.
We been over a few but they die out without persuasion on either side.
if rock formations really were to be seen as old then it should be the geologists here being aggresive in presenting facts or irefutable facts.
Yes these names were the ones who pushed forward, in these small circles, Huttons acceptance. Yet the first geologists were determined, even if some changed their mind, creationists with flood geology a part of it.
A few people were involved then and until modern times. It was hard to get paid to do geology until the present.
The years since has seen few competent researchers in these areas able to overcome their teachings as youths.
it is more substansive the opinions of so many people on the bible being the word of God and Genesis being true then the opinions of a few rock researchers relatively.
You brought up about questioning peoples competence.
Geology in its great conclusions does not employ the scientific method and so is just a study like history. Data and interpretation but no important testing.
it backed up by the fields organized authorities and not evidence in the field.
its not competent in its professionalism ultimately. Remembering its not doing true science but claiming too.
It doesn't show why rocks are not exactly what they are. Collected sediment,lava, by great collection events. No slow show needed.
The geologists here have not , too me, made good cases, or close, to the great conclusions of geology. We can always do as good or better in what was more likely the origin of this or that.
The merits of the case trump claims to authority in human discussion. Unless God is the authority.
We do have a chance here with several actual geologists to show the best proofs for geology confronting young earth claims.
We been over a few but they die out without persuasion on either side.
if rock formations really were to be seen as old then it should be the geologists here being aggresive in presenting facts or irefutable facts.
Upvote
0
