Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you, or anyone, say they aren't Flood deposits, then conclude that the Flood didn't happen, my reply stands as written.You didn't understand him - these are the deposits some YECs claim were left by the Flood.
If you, or anyone, say they aren't Flood deposits, then conclude that the Flood didn't happen, my reply stands as written.
Nope, no plate tectonics anywhere.
Nope, no plate tectonics anywhere.
Nope, no plate tectonics anywhere.
I've been saying that longer than you have, rookie.There are no biblical flood deposits; get over it.
Wow --- mamma mia.This is an aerial view of the San Andreas fault splitting Carrizo Plain in the Temblor Range east of San Luis Obispo, California.
I've been saying that longer than you have, rookie.
(Maybe with the exception of those White Cliffs of Andover.)
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The island of Cyprus in the eastern Mediterranean...[/FONT]
Thrust Fault, Barrage de Tignes France...
The Hawaiian Islands...
Whatever --- look, shutterbug, are we getting anywhere in this conversation? If not, have a good day.Don't you mean White Clifffs of Dover...
Where are you trying to 'get' to?Whatever --- look, shutterbug, are we getting anywhere in this conversation? If not, have a good day.
Whatever --- look, shutterbug, are we getting anywhere in this conversation? If not, have a good day.
While there are many flood deposits there are no global Flood deposits to find because there was no global flood. YEC lost this argument 150 years ago and every bit of relevant data from geology, paleontology, biology and archeology collected since that time has reinforced the conclusion that the flood of Noah if it happened at all could not have been global.You find that Flood deposit first, hot-shot scientist, then we'll talk your nonsense.
If you want to discuss your theology General Apologetics is right down the hall. Do you have anything even the slightest bit relevant to say about dinosaur footprints in supposed Global Flood deposits? If not why don't you and your theology just take a hike over to GA?Until then, keep your dumb photo albums out of our theology.
First of all, Einstein, if God cleaned up the mess thoroughly, the dinosaurs could traipse around all over Pangaea and it wouldn't make any difference.Do you have anything even the slightest bit relevant to say about dinosaur footprints in supposed Global Flood deposits?
Leave it to the Greek Septuagint to give us that gem of an interpretation - [rolls eyes].In the flood account if you read it carefully, especially in the Greek Septuagint you will see that in (Genesis 8:1) God caused an awesome wind to arise that actually contained the waters like a humungous lake in much the same way that He parted the Red sea but way, way bigger. A kind of suspended aquamation,lol.
First of all, Einstein, if God cleaned up the mess thoroughly, the dinosaurs could traipse around all over Pangaea and it wouldn't make any difference.
Second of all, if you're right, and the Flood did leave deposits that dinosaurs stepped in, then barring erosion, standard decay, [Dare I say this next word?] catastrophies, and other forms of footprint annihilation, then I guess there would be footprints found in Global Flood deposits.
Thirdly, unless I'm reading you guys wrong, it appears that what you're saying is that there was a period of time [apparently after the Flood] when the earth was again under water, but only in sections at a time (thus no correlating data); and as I understand it, you guys even claim Kansas was completely under water at one time.
If this is true, then you're mistaking these unrelated inundations for what we claim is the Flood; and perhaps a footprint was found there or something.
If God left evidence of the Flood - if He did - then it must be deeper in the earth.
All those dinos were supposed to have died in the flood. Did God create their tracks down in those various Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous layers while cleaning up after the flood. This makes no sense at all.First of all, Einstein, if God cleaned up the mess thoroughly, the dinosaurs could traipse around all over Pangaea and it wouldn't make any difference.
You obviously have not been paying the least bit of attention. How does an animal leave tracks in layers that are being deposited by a raging global flood and that sit on top of thousands of feet of other supposed global flood deposits? Did God hold them in hyperspace for a while just so they could out and make tracks in the same layers that also have their eggs and nests and body fossils? HOw did they make "tracks" that were preserved in a raging global flood that was supposedly depositing thousands of feet of sediment and sorting fossils "hydrodynamically"?Second of all, if you're right, and the Flood did leave deposits that dinosaurs stepped in, then barring erosion, standard decay, [Dare I say this next word?] catastrophies, and other forms of footprint annihilation, then I guess there would be footprints found in Global Flood deposits.
No we are saying there was no global flood. Many parts of the earth have been under water at various times over the last 550 million years while most of the fossil record was deposited but never all at the same time and certainly not 4,500 years ago.Thirdly, unless I'm reading you guys wrong, it appears that what you're saying is that there was a period of time [apparently after the Flood] when the earth was again under water, but only in sections at a time (thus no correlating data); and as I understand it, you guys even claim Kansas was completely under water at one time.
Exactly what do you claim as the flood? YEC flood geologist never seem to agree as to which deposits are flood deposits. It is obvious to everyone capable of logical thought and with even a little knowledge of geology that the reason they can't agree as to which deposits are from the global flood is that there are no deposits from the global flood.If this is true, then you're mistaking these unrelated inundations for what we claim is the Flood; and perhaps a footprint was found there or something.
There can be no evidence of a global flood that never occurred or are you claiming that evidence for a global flood will some day be found in Precambrian Deposits?If God left evidence of the Flood - if He did - then it must be deeper in the earth.
Right --- I'll get right on it.Please tell us exactly which layers are deposits from a global flood 4,500 years ago and which are not. Which mark the start, peak and end of the flood?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?