Opethian
Big Member
It is the same as yours, like the fossil record, interpreted differently, and the known spiritual factor, and the bible as well.
You mixed up a word. Change differently with WRONG. If you had any insight into science you'd know that.
No, it hasn't, that is old ager's take on the evidence. Just fantasizing baselessly.
It has a base that you don't understand, since you don't understand basic science.
You seem to be waxing ugly here, it will take more than a rotten attitude and a smelly mouth to back up your old age claims here.
You are making me say this kind of stuff. Everything you post is driving me insane because of its utter idiocy!
No, you are mistaken, why make wild claims you can't back up? What math? Evolution goes against the math, the world is 6000 years old.
This is not a wild claim. Explain to me how evolution goes against math?
Spell it out, what are you ranting about now?
How are you going to explain for example, at the same time, that the speed of light was different to explain for the redshifting of planets moving that supports the fact that the universe is 14 billions years old, and the fact plants need light with specific factors, which you would have to alter, to survive? This is just something off the top of my head, if I would make an effort to look at some threads around here and look around the internet to refresh my memory on theories on the age of the universe and the earth, I could easily cook up something far more convincing, but you have gone so far beyond the point of rationality, that I don't even feel like making the effort to do such a thing.
Upvote
0