• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Did God predestine the Fall?

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That you are ignoring the text I posted? I’m reading that clearly.
I don't think I ignored anything. Maybe you need to stop ignoring the fact that your opinion is not the only opinion on the block.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Since there’s no choice they will ever make that will affect their destination, then no.
Wow, you came out and said it. So if some come to Jesus, He may cast them out? Ha.
My question: if God is omniscient, and already knows who will be in hell for eternity, is there anything you can do to change that?

He only knows what we will chose.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do you believe the will dead in sin can make a living choice pleasing to God?
Do you believe people can phrase a question in proper English?

I renounce the false doctrine of inclusivism, I embrace the exclusivist claims of Christ Himself, that He is the way (not one of many), the truth, and the life.
Of course Jesus is the only way. How does this relate to anything discussed here?
Because I hold to the exclusivity of Christ, that alone should give the answer, because it negates all other non-Christian religions from the way, the truth, and the LIFE.
Right...and...so?? I assume we all knew this. His being the way does not mean He gives us no choice to love Him or not.

Wrong, only in Christ is the will in bondage to sin set free
If the will was so in bondage how did people choose to get saved??
, only those in Christ have been set free.
After they choose to be, and because they choose to be.
At what point on the road to Damascus did Saul "choose" Christ?
God knows the hearts. I assume Paul prayed and did some seeking before He did the finding. Did Acts say that Paul had never prayed or sought the truth, or started to question whether he was on the right track?? Have you some reason to claim Paul was some sort of mindless zombie with no capacity to pray sincerely?

Naturally a valley of dry bones cannot be anything but a valley of dry bones.
If God raises them, they are not dry bones any more.

Naturally the mind hostile to God cannot be anything but hostile to God.
Unless Jesus changes your heart inside after being invited in.


You're saying a man can choose to go back into his mother's womb.
No, that is not the truth. I am saying man can avail himself of the choices God set before Him and wants him to decide on. I am saying billions of people are not cast into eternal torments without having first decided.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
If the will was so in bondage how did people choose to get saved??
People are told by Yahweh
to CHOOSE WHO TO SERVE;

that doesn't always result in their salvation - they do not "choose to be saved" .... they cannot become saved by choosing anything.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
I don't think I ignored anything. Maybe you need to stop ignoring the fact that your opinion is not the only opinion on the block.
That wasn’t written to you.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Wow, you came out and said it. So if some come to Jesus, He may cast them out? Ha.
“Many will come to Me that day...”.
He only knows what we will chose.
Yes. That’s not even what I asked. I asked if there is any way to change what God already knows what will happen?

For instance, if God knows your neighbor will never believe, is there anything you can do to change that?
 
Upvote 0
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟122,193.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There appear to be dozens or more sites exposing false teachings and false pastors who piper associates with.
This is just one of many in one online search today (a few minutes ago) >
The False Gospel Of John Piper | Test All Things

The False Gospel Of John Piper

May 20, 2009 - John Piper Agrees With The Arminian View Of Universal Atonement ... We need to continue to expose John Piper's false teachings and cult-like ...

Sometimes it is best to test the test. I also did a quick online search. One link to Piper's 2008 "Limited Atonement" audio part of his TULIP seminar and another newer article from 2016, a couple of years ago I will quote:

"The atonement is the work of God in Christ through Christ’s obedience and death and resurrection by which he canceled the debt of our sin, removed or absorbed the holy wrath of God against us, and secured for us all the benefits of salvation — even eternal life. That is the atonement: the work of God in Christ to achieve all of that. So, the atonement is the work of God to deal with our sin, to deal with this wrath through the work of Christ so that we could have eternal life. Both sides limit this action. Let me see if I can explain.

Those who support so-called unlimited atonement limit the effectiveness of the atonement. They deny that it effectively secures the salvation of any particular persons. Or, to say it another way, they deny that the blood of Jesus secured the promises of the new covenant; namely, that God would take out of his people the unbelieving heart of stone, put in a new, believing heart of flesh, and cause them to walk in God’s ways. Now, those who espouse definite atonement affirm all of that; namely, that the death of Christ did effectively secure the complete, eternal, full salvation of God’s elect, the bride of Christ, including the fulfillment of the promises of the new covenant to take out of each one of his chosen people the heart of stone, put in a new, believing heart, and cause us to walk in his statutes. The blood of Jesus, the atonement, secured that absolutely, effectively, perfectly for all of God’s elect.

......

So, if you asked me, “Did Christ die for everyone?” the answer is, “Christ died for everyone, but not everyone in the same way.” He died for everyone without distinction in John 3:16, in that sense: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son” — in what sense “for the world”? — “that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.” It is because of the atonement that that is possible. You can say that to everybody. In other words, God gave his Son for the world in such a way that whoever believes in him would have eternal life; that is, in such a way that the offer can be made to everybody in every people group in every family in every neighborhood — it can be made without any distinction or without any hesitation. If you believe on Jesus, you will have eternal life.

And the reason this is so is that Christ purchased a full and complete and effective and eternal, infallible salvation for the bride of Christ, and everyone who believes is part of that bride. This is what we offer people when we do evangelism, which we should do every day. We say: There is a complete and full and effective redemption for the people of God. It is already secured, already full, already complete. We invite you to receive Christ. And with him, you receive everything that he bought for his people. So, we are offering Christ to people and the full, complete salvation that he bought for his people, for those who are in him. But this means that Christ died for his bride and he loves his people in a particular and definite way that is different from all the world, just like I love my wife different from all the women that I love in another way.

So, in answer to Vincent’s question, “Isn’t an unlimited atonement more profoundly glorious?” the answer is, “No.” Because that so-called unlimited atonement, if it existed, which it doesn’t, would leave everybody in bondage to sin, because no triumphant grace that takes out the heart of sin and stone and purchases redemption and a new heart, none of that would be provided. And the decisive act of faith that saves us wouldn’t be a gift bought by the blood of Jesus. Nobody would be grafted into the vine, because that only happens because they were purchased by the blood according to the new covenant.

On the other hand, definite atonement is glorious because it accomplishes more, not less, which is why we claim that unlimited is more than limited. No, definite atonement is more glorious because it accomplishes more, not less than the so-called unlimited atonement. It not only purchases a genuine offer to the whole world in terms of John 3:16, but goes beyond the offer and actually accomplishes the triumph over unbelief and hardness of heart and brings to pass salvation and all the purposes of God that depend on it." SOURCE

So nothing I have read thus far from the actual source site resembles the charge of holding to an Arminian view of the atonement. I think in context he means "everyone who believes", the elect. Mind you the above quote is from an interview, and not meant to be a substitution for a statement of faith or Confession, and probably an unscripted talk. Perhaps he could have explained with greater clarity with better choice words? I don't know, but of this I am confident he is a very capable expositor of Scripture, especially evident (to me) in some of his older published materials.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Upvote 0
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟122,193.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
God knows the hearts. I assume Paul prayed and did some seeking before He did the finding. Did Acts say that Paul had never prayed or sought the truth, or started to question whether he was on the right track?? Have you some reason to claim Paul was some sort of mindless zombie with no capacity to pray sincerely?

You assume wrongly about Saul, he was a Pharisee of Pharisees before his conversion. He had great zeal, and pride (at the time) in being a persecutor of early Christians...until Jesus knocked him off his horse with a question and blinded him. Saul wasn't seeking after Christ at all, he didn't ask Christ to "come into his heart", it was just the opposite, Christ came after him, Christ pursued him, and brought Saul into a most humbling submission. Thinking about it, I cannot imagine facing those you once persecuted, the shame and humility of it.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
So why witness?
We cannot change Yahweh,
and cannot change what Yahweh knows, since He Knows All Things Forever and always has Known all things forever.

We can proclaim the Gospel of Jesus , Christ Crucified, so sinners may hear the truth from Yahweh's Word and repent of their sin and their lives and turn to Yahweh and be immersed in Jesus' Name to be saved.

The sinners who see us every day should see the life of Jesus in our lives and when we speak they should hear the Word of ABBA YAHWEH our FATHER ,
and the sinners can change.

Yahweh never changes.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
God knows the hearts. I assume Paul prayed and did some seeking before He did the finding. Did Acts say that Paul had never prayed or sought the truth, or started to question whether he was on the right track?? Have you some reason to claim Paul was some sort of mindless zombie with no capacity to pray sincerely?
Saul served Yahweh , kept TORAH, with ZEAL, but in ignorance.
He never thought of serving Jesus until after struck down, as Yahweh and Jesus planned before the Creation of the world, and set Paul/Saul aside for the Gospel since his birth, as written.

Remember someone did pray for Saul, but it wasn't himself ..... it was someone he oversaw the execution of .... praying for him that he be forgiven , because he knew not what he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,337
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,030
7,265
62
Indianapolis, IN
✟594,630.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
That's what you got out of that post, wow.
Cursed till we choose Jesus. Not after.​
I can see carefully prepared expositions don't appeal to you much. Cursed till the atonement Christ made at the cross.

Yes, and the way we do that is choice. We choose to ask for and accept His free gift.

Of course what we are saved from and for isn't going to make it into the conversation, it never does.

Christians were chosen, yes. Because they chose Him

No, we receive the ingrafted word described as incorruptible seed. That is a work of God, now I never disputed that there is a time of decision or some semblance of surrender, but everything is a work of God in salvation. Believing in the Lord Jesus Christ and his sacrifice for sin is the essence of justification by grace through faith, no self respecting Calvinist would deny this.

What he worked out was providing us a way to choose eternal life. That is the will of God.

Jesus is the way, the truth and the light, no one comes to the Father except by him. You want to emphasize how we must choose but you seem to forget what we are choosing isn't something apart from a work of God through special revelation, otherwise we will never make the insight into who Jesus Christ is or what he has done for us.

There we have it WHEN we chose to believe. Not before. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thous shalt be saved.

You must believe that Jesus is the Christ, Son of the Living God, receive the Holy Spirit of promise which is where the washing, renewing and regeneration of the Holy Spirit comes from. Repentance itself is a work of God since the seat of moral reflection is poisoned by sin and we are weak in our natural selves.

?? What does this even mean?

Read the Pauline epistles much?

Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ. For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us for adoption to sonship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will— to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely given us in the One he loves. (Eph. 1:3-6)
Thirty five times in the first three chapters Paul speaks of being saved, 'in Christ'. You don't know that God chose us before the foundation of the world to be holy, blameless and adopted sons through Christ? That's the gospel, there was never a plan b. You talk a lot about the fact that we believe, but not so much about what we are supposed to believe.

What was determined before was that all who believe in Jesus, (ask to be saved) would be saved. THAT is how.

Sure, at the time of decision child like faith is sufficient, I don't know a single Calvinist that would deny that. Faith is a work of God in our lives, unless God makes the revelation to you you can do nothing. What is more repentance isn't as much an act of the will as a change of attitude that happens at the seat of moral reflection which is itself an act of God. Jesus is the author and finisher of our faith, another point of doctrine you have completely missed.

Well, long as you define 'predestinity' as having the choice, fine. Too bad that is not really what most people define it as.

Oh, you are having a problem with the definition, why didn't you say so:

Predestine (προορίζω proorizō G4309) - from G4253 and G3724; to limit in advance, i.e. (figuratively) predetermine:—determine before, ordain, predestinate.

For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before G4309 to be done. (Act 4:28),

For whom he did foreknow, he G4309 also did predestinate G4309 to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. (Rom 8:29)

Moreover whom he did predestinate, G4309 them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified. (Rom 8:30)

But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained G4309 before the world unto our glory: (1Co 2:7)

Having predestinated G4309 us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, (Eph 1:5)

In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated G4309 according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will: (Eph 1:11)
That's the 7 times the word is used in 6 verses, along with the direct quotes where it is used.

No. The issue here is whether billions of people were pre fated to go to hell, and others pre fated to go to heaven regardless of choice. We just had one Calvie here recently say that our choice was 'insignificant'.

It pales in insignificance to what God has done for us, is what this Calvinist would tell you in no uncertain terms.

This is going in circles, predictable. There is nothing in those verses about being predestined to hell, that's an absurd strawman argument, no one is making. A child of perdition can be doomed to the lake of fire but it's not like God chose that for them. I wouldn't have so much a problem with arguments against predestination if it actually dealt with the formal doctrine, I haven't seen that much at all.

God predestined that all who would be holy and blameless, adopted as sons and indwelled with the Holy Spirit of promise would do so in Christ. Your arguing against pagan fate, which has never had anything to do with Calvinist predestination.

What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Certainly not! For He says to Moses: “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then, it does not depend on man’s desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. (Romans 9:14-16)​

'It does not depend on man's desire or effort, but on God mercy'. That is how the gospel works, it always depends on what God does for us and in us, not of works lest any man should boast.

Grace and peace,
Mark
 
Upvote 0

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,337
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That you are ignoring the text I posted? I’m reading that clearly.
I didn't ignore the text you posted. I showed how you are misinterpreting it. You did not read what I wrote, otherwise you would have addressed what I said.

You know I have said that I was not born as a son of disobedience, but I became a son of disobedience after James 1:14-15 - I was tempted into sin, bringing forth death, just as Romans 7:9 says I was alive until that time, when the commandment empowered sin to put me to death.

You are of a mind that says a baby is born without the spirit of God in them. That is false teaching, not scriptural. You have no scriptural support for that view.

And so the point of that discourse in our conversation, was from post #266: you think that I don't deserve salvation? .. what, do you think I would not resent God if He had given me a life that led to hell with no opportunity to escape that doom?

That about shows how stark the difference is between your idea of God, vs mine. God is love, but what your doctrine says Him to be does not add up to that conclusion. That is why many hear that doctrine and they are forever shut off from Christianity. They see the hypocrisy and injustice that you don't see, and they can never see God as a just and loving God, because that doctrine doesn't lead to that conclusion.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0