- Aug 8, 2004
- 11,336
- 1,728
- 65
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I never imagined motive to be an issue because then we are talking about justification for an action already committed, where the choice of perhaps a lessor of two evils - take a life to save another for example - could be justified by examining motive. In that case we could talk about after the fact that evil can be used/done for the greater Good. In the same way we can talk about God ALLOWING evil to exist for the greater Good - and in His case - it must ALWAYS be so regardless if we recognize or could even know/see what that greater Good is. In my mind we can never get to logically talking about motive in these discussion because we cannot logically get to saying "God creates evil" in order to then talk about why we think He would do so.What I believe everyone is missing here is motive, meaning: why something was created. When you only look at an end result you miss the beginning, what I mean by that is evil, like a stick of dynamite has the potential for good, to create smooth roads through mountains, but it becomes evil when it is used to kill.
God's original intention for the creation of evil was so we could understand what is good, if evil remains as just knowledge, dead of any life or power, it only serves as a light of knowledge to understand what is good and that which is good is God,
In short, the only way we could/can/ever will understand God is also to understand evil, having something to compare it to. But He and we only give life and power to the light (knowledge) of good not to the light(knowledge) of evil
Talking about motive is different from suggesting a Will that has a singular focused can be turned aside to move God to act against Himself - which we would have to be doing in order to claim He creates evil. And it would be that turning aside of His Will which is only focused on the Good to which all Christians in good Faith must object to. That discussion is very different from asking what could be God's motive for allowing something He could clearly stop - evil for example or the suffering it causes.
BTW we could not speak in terms of God's "original" intention unless we deny He both knew evil is a possibility when creating creatures free to commit evil (an absurd position since even we can figure that much out) and also deny that He knew the future; meaning He knew when He made that choice to create such creatures that some would rebel, including who, what, when, how, how often and how badly (which includes the actions of all of us here). So He both knew all that and chose to do it anyway (for His Glory and the greater Good). Most of us do not believe God so ignorant and certainly not more ignorant than us and that such would not fit with any concept of Perfect Knowledge. Which means a denial of Perfect Knowledge is sort of required to some degree if one is going to claim He lacked before creation or lacks now any or all such knowledge.
Upvote
0