- Aug 8, 2004
- 11,336
- 1,728
- 65
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I can agree there would be no conflict "seen" by some folks, because the opinion it could be so is not unique. I do wonder why some think it important to view God as both able and actually making evil. I suspect they irrationally believe if they did not believe it is so, that it would mean the Bible is error in the expression being considered and that thought troubles them greatly. I think that irrational fear that the Bible could be in error (rather than their understanding of it) clouds the view and enables many to simply ignore the irrationality of declaring Good creates the opposite of Himself. Some things we do not and may never know because as finite beings we have limits, and we call those things mysteries - beyond our ability to fully think through.He is all good but he also says he creates evil. There is no conflict there.
That Good is Good and therefore cannot create evil is not one those mysteries. If it were a mystery, then a pagan like Plato (and also equally clever Christian Fathers) would not have been able to reason it out. For a mystery to be known, God has to reveal it first and then give us the Faith to believe in the evidence of it even when the concept defies our reason (One Being, Three Persons for example). This concept discussed in this thread is not even remotely one of those of revealed "mysteries".
However I very much doubt that not "seeing it", if it truly isn't just ignored, could be a result of a rational process in the mind of anyone expressing it. My doubt becomes only more of a certainty when a person not "seeing it" also expresses that one of the greatest rational minds expressing the logic of what they are "not seeing" is devoid of any benefit for them.
Last edited:
Upvote
0