• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Did all the laws end at the cross- Part 2

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,318
5,495
USA
✟697,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Were the 10 not delivered by the hand of Moses?

Again, a huge pillar of your argument appears to be the fact that the 10 were engraved by the finger of God and the others were not.

Well, why does that distinction merit your believing that they live on when you concede the other elements of the Law of Moses are not set aside?

I could just as easily declare that since the instruction to abstain from certain foods came straight from God's mouth that this accords those laws "special" status, and on the basis of such status, they are not retired.

Why does "delivery by finger" outweigh "delivery by voice"?

The Ten and only the Ten were both spoken by our Creator and written personally by the finger of God. Exodus 31:18 Exodus 34:28, Exodus 20 Only the Ten were inside the ark of the covenant placed in the Most Holy where God dwells and is revealed in heaven. Revelation 11:19

The law of Moses was placed outside the ark of the covenant, written by Moses in a book as a witness against you, Deuteronomy 31:24 God's law is not grievous 1 John 5:3. The law of Moses was added because of sin Galatians 3:19, the law of God points out sin, Romans 7:7, Romans 3:20. The law of Moses contained curses Deuteronomy 29:20-21, Galatians 3:10 and made nothing perfect Hebrews 7:19. The law of God is perfect Psalms 19:7 and brings blessings and peace Proverbs 29:18, Psalms 119:165 the law of Moses in the book of ordinances ended with Jesus being our Perfect sacrifice. Ephesians 2:15, Col 2:14-16, Hebrews 8:13 not God's law which is ETERNAL and UNCHANGING Matthew 5:17-19
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The Ten and only the Ten were both spoken by our Creator and written personally by the finger of God. Exodus 31:18 Exodus 34:28, Exodus 20 Only the Ten were inside the ark of the covenant placed in the Most Holy where God dwells and is revealed in heaven. Revelation 11:19
Again, why do these facts justify a belief that the 10 are still in force, especially in light of statements like this?

But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.

As has been repeatedly pointed, and as a neutral reader will surely see, this text poses a devastating challenge to your position.

Your response? You change "serve" to "be judged by".

The greek word translated as "serve" here appears here in Matthew 6:24:

No one can serve two masters

Why not do the same thing and change this to:

No one can be judged by two masters

If you do not see the problem, I think neutral readers will.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
the law of God points out sin, Romans 7:7,
Not that simple. While tearing a verse out of its context is common practice, it is not sound exegesis.

What does Paul actually say? He says that he learned (past tense!) what sin is through the Law:

I would not have come to know (***past tense) sin except through the Law; for I would not have known (***past tense) about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet

The point is this: This text does not, repeat not, force us to conclude that the law still serves this role of letting us know what sin is. More to the point, this text fits perfectly well with the view that I am espousing - while the 10 were actually in force, they let the Jew knew what sin is.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
This whole argument that the 10 must be still in force because they were written by the finger of God has another big problem.

The implication of this argument is that the fact that God used His finger to document the 10 means they have a kind of eternal, unchangeable status.

Well, even if you believe that, in the following, Paul is saying we are no longer to be condemned or judged by the Law (and I think that takes way too much liberties with the text, but we'll let that pass for the moment), it still means something fundamental has changed vis a vis the law.

But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter

There is no escape - our relationship with the 10 has profoundly changed in some way.

But how can this be if, as some argue, these 10 have a kind of eternal, unchangeable status because God engraved them on stone with His very finger?
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,318
5,495
USA
✟697,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Again, why do these facts justify a belief that the 10 are still in force, especially in light of statements like this?

But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.

As has been repeatedly pointed, and as a neutral reader will surely see, this text poses a devastating challenge to your position.

Your response? You change "serve" to "be judged by".

The greek word translated as "serve" here appears here in Matthew 6:24:

No one can serve two masters

Why not do the same thing and change this to:

No one can be judged by two masters

If you do not see the problem, I think neutral readers will.


If we are in the Spirit we are keeping the commandments according to Jesus and the Spirit is given to those who obey. So you seem to be isolating this scripture and missing a lot of context that could change the direction of your path. We should always look for Truth in scripture, because the Truth is there for those who are willing to replace their will with God’s will and God said He shows mercy to those who love Him and keep His commandments Exodus 20:6 now written in the heart and mind Hebrews 8:10 like Jesus who says If you love Me keep my commandments John 14:15. I think the Words from our Savior’s mouth disagrees with your interpretation of scriptures.

The promises are all conditional.

John 14:15 “If you love Me, keep My commandments. 16 And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever— 17 the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him; but you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you. 18 I will not leave you orphans; I will come to you.

Acts 5:32 And we are His witnesses to these things, and so also is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey Him.” God said in the Ten, He shows mercy to those who obey His commandments. Exodus 20:6

We will be judged by the Ten Commandments James 2:10-12 breaking one of the commandments is like breaking them all and Jesus said to keep the least of the commandments quoting from the Ten. Matthew 5:19-30 Jesus quoting from the Ten verbatim when asked which commandments to keep Matthew 19:17-19

I guess we will find out soon enough, because Jesus is coming back soon. We are called to worship in Spirit and Truth John 4:23-34 and the Bible is one continuous book anyone can make a case with an isolated verse or two, but the scriptures do not teach lawlessness. Matthew 7:21-23.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If we are in the Spirit we are keeping the commandments according to Jesus and the Spirit is given to those who obey.
What is the exact text or texts that undergird this assertion? More to the point, what text says that if we are in the Spirit, we are keeping the 10 commandments. There may indeed be such a text - if there is, please let us know.

I have never denied that the indwelling Spirit will "tell us" that murder, adultery, and covetousness, for example are wrong (as the 10 also declare). But there is a huge, if perhaps subtle distinction here: I believe scripture teaches that we set the 10 aside and listen to the Spirit and the teachings of Jesus. Unsurprisingly, these sources of moral guidance are going to often align with the 10 commandments.

You, on the other hand, appear to believe we still need to refer to the 10 as a source of moral guidance. While the end results may be the same - we both agree murder and adultery are wrong - the fact that we acquire those beliefs through different means is a significant difference.

In fact, I believe that Paul teaches that looking to the law, including the 10, sets you up to fail so we definitely should not be looking to the 10. I will expand on this later.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
One common pattern we see here is the following:

- a text T is provided is provided in support of a position P
- the response ignores the content of T and appeals to other texts as if such appeals make T "go away".

We should not be doing this (I may have this as well at times).

When a certain text T is presented, you are obliged to explain to us how it fits into to your overall position - you cannot simply point to other texts as if those other texts "trump" T - T still needs to be dealt with.

So, for example, when Romans 7:6 is presented, one has to deal with it - one has to explain how it is accommodated into the position that you hold. It is not good enough to list and analyze other texts as if do not also need to deal with Romans 7:6

To be fair, I concede that I have not yet addressed of the stuff in Revelation about the ark of the covenant. Just as others need to make sense of Romans 7:6, I need to make sense of that Revelation stuff.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,318
5,495
USA
✟697,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
One common pattern we see here is the following:

- a text T is provided is provided in support of a position P
- the response ignores the content of T and appeals to other texts as if such appeals make T "go away".

We should not be doing this (I may have this as well at times).

When a certain text T is presented, you are obliged to explain to us how it fits into to your overall position - you cannot simply point to other texts as if those other texts "trump" T - T still needs to be dealt with.

So, for example, when Romans 7:6 is presented, one has to deal with it - one has to explain how it is accommodated into the position that you hold. It is not good enough to list and analyze other texts as if do not also need to deal with Romans 7:6

To be fair, I concede that I have not yet addressed of the stuff in Revelation about the ark of the covenant. Just as others need to make sense of Romans 7:6, I need to make sense of that Revelation stuff.

Romans 7:6 has been addressed in depth. I also think you need to look at the warning scripture provides for those who misunderstand Paul's writings to their own destruction. 2 Peter 3:16 The whole bible has to reconcile. We are not left with any contradictions, maybe some scriptures are hard to understand more than others no doubt, but you can start to understand scriptures when you realize some things are absolutes, the Ten Commandments are one of those absolutes which is why God writes His laws in our hearts and minds in the New Covenant and why every one of the Ten Commandments is repeated for every day Christian living. Why personally God only wrote the Ten Commandments and why only the Ten are in the ark of the covenant in the Most Holy where God dwells and is revealed in Heaven. This is God's will for us and reading any of the Ten Commandment should be able to see how God's law is good for us. The Ten Commandments are on a whole other foundation.

@LoveGodsWord addressed Romans 7:6 in great detail. We should look for God's Truth in scripture, because misinterpreting key points that could lead to our own destruction should not be the path we look to take. The life that matters is not on this earth, but the eternal life we receive through the blood of Jesus when we turn from sin and walk in obedience to Him. There is no consequence for those who keep the Ten Commandments. The commandment of God is not grievous and it is how we love God 1 John 5:3, John 14:15, Exodus 20:6 but there are plenty of warnings for those who don't. Matthew 5:17-30, Matthew 19:17-19, Matthew 7:21-23, 1 John 2:3-5. Revelation 22:14-15

I would suggest you prayerfully read this post from LGW and take your time. You have nothing to lose except hopefully hearing the truth about Pual's writings

This was already addressed elsewhere your taking a single scripture from it's contexts around Romans 6:1-23; Romans 7:1-25 and Romans 8:1-13 and trying to apply an interpretation to fit a teaching of lawlessness (without law) which is not biblical or supported in the scriptures. There is no where in the entire bible that teaches that God's 10 commandments are abolished. It is a teaching that has Paul in contradiction with Paul when he says faith does not abolish Gods' law it establishes Gods' law in Romans 3:31 or that circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the commandments of God in 1 Corinthians 7:19 or elsewhere when Paul shows that we love our neighbor as ourselves by being obedient to those commandments from Gods' law that show us how we love our fellow man in Romans 13:8-10.

Paul also shows in Romans 8:1-4 that the righteousness (moral right doing - Psalms 119:172) of the law is fulfilled in us as we walk not in the flesh but in Gods' Spirit (see also Galatians 5:16). Paul does not teach a teaching of lawlessness or that Gods' 10 commandments are abolished anywhere in the bible. He teaches they are established by faith and are a part of Gods 'new covenant promise *Hebrews 8:10-12 from Jeremiah 31:31-36 and Ezekiel 36:24-27. It is Paul not me that says that God's law is holy, just and good in Romans 7:12 and that it is God's law that gives us the knowledge of what sin is when broken that is defined as breaking Gods' law in Romans 3:20 and Romans 7:7 and that the purpose of Gods' law is to show us we are all sinners in need of Gods' grace that we can receive through faith as shown in Romans 2:4-29 to Romans 3:1-23 and that faith does not abolish Gods' law, but establishes Gods' law in the lives of all those who believe what Gods' Word says.

Your interpretation of a single scripture in Romans 7:6 taken away from it's context to apply a meaning that Gods 10 commandments have been abolished has Paul in contradiction with Paul and the rest of the bible. Here let's prove this and add all the context back in first by looking at the previous verse your disregarding. We can have a look at the whole chapter if your interpreted and their connection with Romans 6:1-23 through to Romans 7:1-25 and Romans 8:1-13 in another post if your interested that says the same thing that is being shared with you here, but let's simply start with the immediate scripture context your disregarding again if it might be helpful. Romans 7:1-7 is building on what Paul was talking about in Romans 6:1-23 where he contrasts baptism and the death of the old man of sin or dying to our sinful nature and walking in newness of life. Romans 8:1-13 is building on both Romans 6 and Romans 7 contrasting walking in the Spirit and not in the old man of the flesh that has died so that we can be married to another in Christ. This is all context your disregarding that does not agree with your interpretation of Romans 7:6.

Take a look...

Romans 7:1-7
[1], Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?
[2], For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.
[3], So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.
[4], Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
[5], For when we were in the FLESH <G4561 Carnal mind or sinful human nature>, the motions of SINS, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit to death.
[6], But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.
[7], What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust,3 except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
FROM THE SCRIPTURES ABOVE
  • Paul is speaking to those who understand the law - Romans 7:1
  • The law has dominion over a man as long as we live - Romans 7:1
  • Example of marriage and a woman being bound to her husband as long as she lives - Romans 7:2
  • If the husband dies then she is free to marry another - Romans 7:2-3
  • We are to become dead to the law (of our first husband) by the body of Christ - Romans 7:2-4
  • For when we were in the flesh (first husband sinful nature) the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death - Romans 7:5
  • We are to die to what has bound us which is sin - Romans 7:5-6
  • Dying to that which has bound us (sin and death) we can serve in newness of life of the Spirit - Romans 7:6 compare Galatians 5:16 with Romans 8:1-4 and Romans 8:13.
  • It is through the law of God we have the knowledge of what sin is - Romans 7:7
The context your disregarding here is that Paul is talking to those who know the law and is saying that before we come to Christ we (those who know the law) are married to the law of sin and death which is working in our members. That is Gods' law reveals sin to us and gives us the knowledge of what sin is when broken. This first husband (sinful nature) must die before we can be married to Christ to walk in His Spirit in newness of life. This agrees with what Paul is talking about already in Romans 6:1-23 where he is talking about the true meaning of "baptism" and dying to the old man of sin so we can walk in newness of life.
Romans 6:1-7
[1], What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
[2], God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? [3], Know you not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
[4], Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
[5], For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
[6], Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that from now on we should not serve sin.
[7], For he that is dead is freed from sin.
[8], Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
[9], Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dies no more; death has no more dominion over him.
[10], For in that he died, he died to sin once: but in that he lives, he lives to God.
[11], Likewise reckon you also yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
[12], Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in the lusts thereof.
[13], Neither yield you your members as instruments of unrighteousness to sin: but yield yourselves to God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God.
[14], For sin shall not have dominion over you: for you are not under the law, but under grace.
[15], What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
[16], Know you not, that to whom you yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants you are to whom you obey; whether of sin to death, or of obedience to righteousness?
[17], But God be thanked, that you were the servants of sin, but you have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
[18], Being then made free from sin, you became the servants of righteousness.

FROM THE SCRIPTURES ABOVE
  • We are not to continue in sin - Romans 6:1-2
  • We are to be dead to sin - Romans 6:2
  • We baptized into Christs death - Romans 6:3
  • We are buried into Christs death through baptism - Romans 6:4
  • We are to walk in newness of life - Romans 6:4-5
  • Our old man of sin and death is crucified with Christ - Romans 6:6
  • Our old man of sin and death is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that from now on we should not serve sin - Romans 6:6
  • Our old man of sin and death is dead in Christ so we can be freed from sin - Romans 6:6-7
  • Our old man of sin and death is dead with Christ so that we can live with Christ (married to another - Romans 7:1-7) - Romans 6:8
  • We are to reckon ourselves dead indeed to sin, but alive to God through Jesus - Romans 6:11
  • We are not to let sin (breaking God's law) reign in our bodies any longer - Romans 6:12
  • We are to yield ourselves to God as those being alive from the dead - Romans 6:13
  • Sin (breaking Gods' law) is no longer to have dominion over us - Romans 6:14
  • We are made free from sin to become servants of right doing - Romans 6:18
................

CONCLUSION: It is that which binds us that we are released from which is sin that we are to die to not the law that gives us a knowledge of what sin is, so that we can be married to Christ and walk in His Spirit. We are released from the condemnation of sin and death through faith in Gods' Word and by walking in Gods Spirit in newness of life (Romans 8:1-4). So nope Romans 7:6 does not teach anywhere that Gods' 10 commandments are abolished. It is teaching that we must be released from the sin (breaking God's law) that has bound us to be married to another (Christ) to walk in newness of life not of the letter but of the Spirit of God. Every time you read the word "sin" above you can substitute it to breaking Gods' law and not believing Gods' Word *Romans 3:20; Romans 7:7; 1 John 3:4; James 2:10-11 and Romans 14:23. If there is no law then we have no knowledge of what sin is.

May God bless you as you receive his Words of correction
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,279
2,553
55
Northeast
✟237,109.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
To be fair, I concede that I have not yet addressed of the stuff in Revelation about the ark of the covenant. Just as others need to make sense of Romans 7:6, I need to make sense of that Revelation stuff.
Here's my take, if anyone is interested.

"Ark" appears just once in Revelation according to this search:
BibleGateway - Keyword Search: Ark

The simply says that an ark is in the temple in heaven.

A question immediately comes up, how many arks are there, one or two? Is the ark in heaven the same one that was in the temple in Jerusalem up until the Babylonians attacked? And then it was taken up to heaven?

Or was the ark that the Israelites built in the wilderness a copy of the one in heaven?

If there are two arks, when they put the 10 commandments inside and the law of Moses on the outside, did someone also do that to the ark in heaven?

On the other hand, suppose there was always only one ark. If the presence of the ten commandments inside the ark in heaven leads us to the conclusion that the 10 are still in effect today,
then the presence of the law of Moses on the outside of the ark in heaven would also lead us to the conclusion that the law of Moses is still in effect today.

############

"Commandment" appears 3 times in Revelation according to this search:
BibleGateway - Keyword Search: Commandment

The issue I see there is the same as many other references that use the word "commandment". Which commandments?
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Romans 7:6 has been addressed in depth.
....
@LoveGodsWord addressed Romans 7:6 in great detail.
I believe all arguments presented in the other other thread amounted either to

(a) to a redefinition of the word "serve" to "by judged by".

(b) an avoidance strategy (the thing I just wrote about) where the actual text of Romans 7:6 is not dealt with and appeal to other texts are made as if those magically make Romans 7:6 go away.

But the floor is your: please present with a clear, concise argument about how you interpret Romans 7:6 that actually engages the text of this verse. You are, of course, free to appeal to other texts but you need also explain how the exact wording of 7:6 fits in to the overall argument you present.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,318
5,495
USA
✟697,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
What is the exact text or texts that undergird this assertion? More to the point, what text says that if we are in the Spirit, we are keeping the 10 commandments. There may indeed be such a text - if there is, please let us know.
Jesus quotes this very thing directly from the Ten Commandments

Matthew 5:21 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ 22 But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire. 23 Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. 25 Agree with your adversary quickly, while you are on the way with him, lest your adversary deliver you to the judge, the judge hand you over to the officer, and you be thrown into prison. 26 Assuredly, I say to you, you will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny.

Adultery in the Heart
27 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell. 30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell.

So when you do the things above which is the Spirit of the commandments will you literally be breaking the commandments or keeping them? This is what it means to walk in the Spirit which means you are keeping the commandments of God and Jesus again quotes directly from the Ten Commandments as the example.



I have never denied that the indwelling Spirit will "tell us" that murder, adultery, and covetousness, for example are wrong (as the 10 also declare). But there is a huge, if perhaps subtle distinction here: I believe scripture teaches that we set the 10 aside and listen to the Spirit and the teachings of Jesus. Unsurprisingly, these sources of moral guidance are going to often align with the 10 commandments.

You, on the other hand, appear to believe we still need to refer to the 10 as a source of moral guidance. While the end results may be the same - we both agree murder and adultery are wrong - the fact that we acquire those beliefs through different means is a significant difference.

I give glory to God for everything that we have in this this world including the commandments that God personally wrote and God personally spoke. ALL things are made by God. So when you choose to keep some of the commandments because you think its the right thing instead of obeying because its a commandment of God and not others because you think you don't need to, you are discrediting the Authority of our Creator and Savior. Basically you are saying you know better than God and you obey on your authority, not God's.


Right in the Ten Commandments God tells us what His commandments are. Once God reveals the definition of something it does not change the next time you see it in scripture. With this belief, I can see why understanding what the commandments of God are throughout scripture would be challenging. It should all be cleared up when Jesus quotes verbatim from the Ten saying to keep the least of the commandments and which commandments to keep to enter into life.

God spoke and wrote these words right in the Ten Commandments- it is how GOD identifies His commandments so when you see it written like this in scripture it most certainly means the Ten Commandments.: Exodus 20:6 but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments.

Jesus said the exact same thing: John 14:15 15 “If you love Me, keep My commandments.

And John
1 John 5:3 For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome.

Jesus was asked which commandments to enter into eternal life and Jesus quoted directly from the Ten Commandments

Matthew 19:17 So He said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.”

18 He said to Him, “Which ones?”

Quoting directly from Exodus 20


Jesus said, “‘You shall not murder,’ ‘You shall not commit adultery,’ ‘You shall not steal,’ ‘You shall not bear false witness,’ 19 ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ ”

We are warned by not keeping the commandments

1 John 2:3 Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. 4 He who says, “I know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him. 6 He who says he abides in Him ought himself also to walk just as He walked.

Jesus kept the commandments as our example and told us to as well

John 15:10 If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love.

Jesus has the same warning as John for those who do not keep His commandments

Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’

Who do you think wants us to break the commandments of God? It most certainly is not God, but God's enemy. Which side do you want to be on?

There is only a remnant now who keep the commandments of God. As shown in scripture which is easy to see is true by just reading these Christian forums who the majority argue against the commandments of God. The Ten Commandments used to be in public schools not so long ago now "churches" are teaching people you don't need to keep the commandments of God. I don't worry what people tell me, the only safeguard is God's pure Word, the Holy scriptures.

Revelation 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

This is the fruit of a saved person according to scriptures.

Revelation 14:12
Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.

One of the last scriptures in the Bible right before the Revelation of Jesus Christ

Revelation 22:14 Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city. 15 But outside are dogs and sorcerers (Breaking commandment #1 Exodus 20:3) and sexually immoral (breaking commandment #7 Exodus 20:14) and murderers (breaking commandment #6 Exodus 20:13) and idolaters (breaking commandment #2 Exodus 20:4-6), and whoever loves and practices a lie (breaking # 9 Exodus 20:16). The commandments are a unit of Ten Exodus 34:28 and James says you break one commandment quoting from the Ten you break them all. James 2:10-12

Right now we have time to change our path. Jesus wants to give everyone mercy and grace and we do this by having a changed heart. We obey the commandments of God not to be saved but because we are transformed, it is a fruit of our faith.

Once Jesus comes back probation will be closed and our fates sealed in much like the days of Noah.

Revelation 22:11 He who is unjust, let him be unjust still; he who is filthy, let him be filthy still; he who is righteous, let him be righteous still; he who is holy, let him be holy still.”


Paul your favorite author tells us this- we have two choices:

Romans 6:16 Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one’s slaves whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness? Which reconciles with the rest of the scriptures.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
which is why God writes His laws in our hearts and minds in the New Covenant
The problem with this, as has been repeatedly pointed out in the other thread is what it means for God to "write laws on our heart". I will repeat my objection to what I understand to be your take on this:

Here is the problem: if, repeat if, you are essentially saying that we take the Law and "internalize" it "as is", or memorize it, that would be a very difficult position to make sense of in light of what Paul (and Jesus) say.

To be more specific, to simply "memorize" the Law entails no fundamental change - it involves the mere mechanics of taking the Law and learning it by heart. Surely this cannot be what is meant by promises "to write the Law on our hearts". Surely the idea is that we would no longer need to actually refer to the Law to guide our actions - otherwise, the distinction between the Law on paper and the Law "on our hearts" is a mere technicality - a difference of form, and not of substance.

In short, no reasonable person would use the "write law on our heart" metaphor as a way of simply saying that we memorize what was on paper (or stone, as the case may be). I believe the metaphor must mean that the "underlying principles" of the Law are made known to us.

And the NT gives us the "how" of this - the indwelling Spirit.

Now then, please actually address what I am saying - explain to us how it is that your position is not subject the critique I have provided. Please deal with the actual argument.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,318
5,495
USA
✟697,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The problem with this, as has been repeatedly pointed out in the other thread is what it means for God to "write laws on our heart". I will repeat my objection to what I understand to be your take on this:

Here is the problem: if, repeat if, you are essentially saying that we take the Law and "internalize" it "as is", or memorize it, that would be a very difficult position to make sense of in light of what Paul (and Jesus) say.

To be more specific, to simply "memorize" the Law entails no fundamental change - it involves the mere mechanics of taking the Law and learning it by heart. Surely this cannot be what is meant by promises "to write the Law on our hearts". Surely the idea is that we would no longer need to actually refer to the Law to guide our actions - otherwise, the distinction between the Law on paper and the Law "on our hearts" is a mere technicality - a difference of form, and not of substance.

In short, no reasonable person would use the "write law on our heart" metaphor as a way of simply saying that we memorize what was on paper (or stone, as the case may be). I believe the metaphor must mean that the "underlying principles" of the Law are made known to us.

And the NT gives us the "how" of this - the indwelling Spirit.

Now then, please actually address what I am saying - explain to us how it is that your position is not subject the critique I have provided. Please deal with the actual argument.
I have many times.

It's hard to reason with someone who thinks their opinions are equal to the scriptures. I am going to stick with the scriptures, and we can agree to disagree. Take care.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Freth
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
why every one of the Ten Commandments is repeated for every day Christian living.
Where are they repeated in the New Testament for "everyday Christian living"?

And, no, I don't where are they referred to or praised. Where in the New Testament does anyone, Paul or Jesus or anyone, say anything that essentially forces us to believe that we are still supposed to look to the 10 this side of the cross?
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why personally God only wrote the Ten Commandments and why only the Ten are in the ark of the covenant in the Most Holy where God dwells and is revealed in Heaven.
This is a good question? Specifically with respect to the "written by finger" part of your argument, you cannot simply assume that this means they last forever, especially in light of texts that suggest otherwise. I concede that I have yet to deal with the "revealed in Heaven" part.

As I have pointed out above, if the "written by the finger" part is to significant, why would other laws not remain in force - after all God spoke them directly to Moses.

Why does "the finger of God" carry more authority than the voice of God?
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,318
5,495
USA
✟697,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Where are they repeated in the New Testament for "everyday Christian living"?

And, no, I don't where are they referred to or praised. Where in the New Testament does anyone, Paul or Jesus or anyone, say anything that essentially forces us to believe that we are still supposed to look to the 10 this side of the cross?
Read Did all the laws end at the cross- Part 2

The Law of God in the New Testament.
1. "You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve" (Matthew 4:10).
2. "Little children, keep yourselves from idols" (1 John 5:21). "Since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, something shaped by art and man’s devising" (Acts 17:29).
3. "That the name of God and His doctrine may not be blasphemed" (1 Timothy 6:1).
4. "He has spoken in a certain place of the seventh day in this way: 'And God rested on the seventh day from all His works.' There remains therefore a rest ["keeping of a sabbath," margin] for the people of God. For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His" (Hebrews 4:4, 9, 10).
and they rested according to the commandment Luke 23:56
Luke 4:16, John 15:10
5. "Honor your father and your mother" (Matthew 19:19).
6. "You shall not murder" (Romans 13:9).
7. "You shall not commit adultery" (Matthew 19:18).
8. "You shall not steal" (Romans 13:9).
9. "You shall not bear false witness" (Romans 13:9).
10. "You shall not covet" (Romans 7:7).

The Law of God in the Old Testament.
1. "You shall have no other gods before Me" (Exodus 20:3).
2. "You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments" (Exodus 20:4–6).
3. "You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain" (Exodus 20:7).
4. "Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it" (Exodus 20:8–11).
5. "Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you" (Exodus 20:12).
6. "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13).
7. "You shall not commit adultery" (Exodus 20:14).
8. "You shall not steal" (Exodus 20:15).
9. "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor" (Exodus 20:16).
10. "You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's" (Exodus 20:17).
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Freth
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It's hard to reason with someone who thinks their opinions are equal to the scriptures. I am going to stick with the scriptures, and we can agree to disagree. Take care.
You have no evidence to support these accusations but you are, of course, free to make them.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
This was already addressed elsewhere your taking a single scripture from it's contexts around Romans 6:1-23; Romans 7:1-25 and Romans 8:1-13 and trying to apply an interpretation to fit a teaching of lawlessness (without law) which is not biblical or supported in the scriptures.
Strawman - I have never posted anything that directly or indirectly shows that I support lawlessness.

You may elect to equate lawlessness - the general concept of not following any law - with not following a particular law - the 10 in this case - but that is your problem, not mine.

I am no more "lawless" for not looking to the 10 than I am lawless for not following American law, as a Canadian. I follow Canadian law - the fact that I do not follow American law does not make me lawless!

This proves that the fact that one does not follow a particular law does not make one lawless!
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,781.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There is no where in the entire bible that teaches that God's 10 commandments are abolished.
Ephesians 2 declares this:

11Therefore remember that formerly you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called "Uncircumcision" by the so-called "Circumcision," which is performed in the flesh by human hands-- 12remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world. 13But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near through the blood of Christ.
14For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, 15by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace


Consider verse 12. Why was the Gentile excluded from citizenship in Israel? I suggest that the reason is the Law of Moses (the Torah) - the Torah was effectively a national charter for the Jews, it is Torah that would be understood to mark out "citizenship in Israel". It is the abolition of the Torah that supports a sensible interpretation of the material from 14 onward, material which is all about the newly achieved unity of Jew and Gentile. How would one naturally bring Jew and Gentile together? Obviously by getting rid of the complex set of laws, practices, ceremonies, and rituals which are for Jew and Jew only. The Torah, being for Jews only, effectively excluded the Gentile from membership in God's true family (Israel). After all, it is the Torah that marked the Jew out from her pagan neighbour.

And let it be clear, there are elements of the 10 that would indeed mark out the Jew as distinct from the Gentile. One of them, and there is at least one other, was very distinctive to the Jew:

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image

Besides, there is much more scriptural evidence for the retirement of the 10 than this stuff form Ephesians 2.
 
Upvote 0