SuzQ
I'm.....Wonder Woman
Mistyfogg said:People have a big misunderstanding of the people of the Middle East. Everyone just looks at it in black and white. Good vs. evil. I totally agree with what the_cheat was saying in post #53.
It just gives them all the more reason to want to lash out against us if we punish them severely. It is just more ammo for their arsenal. It is a viscious cycle, and both sides think that what they are doing is right. Unless people try and understand the other side, the situation will only get worse. Just tightening the grip, invading more countries, killing more people will only create more tension. Informing yourself and looking for the root of the problem and trying to find an intelligent solution would work, instead of just hot-head revenge.
I 100% agree with Misty on this....if it would only work for terrorist networks, which cannot be contained in one country, unfortunately. Look how far the larger countries of the world have come in working things out - countries that used to despise what the other stood for and waged war on one another - Russia, Japan, Germany, France, Mexico, Ireland, Scotland, Great Britain, the U.S., etc, etc. We now have what's called "summits" where we've been able to work out "world issues" amicably & keep our relations, for the most part. I think we've come along way, in that respect. Misty is totally right that this should be the first course of action, and it usually is.
However, with extreme religious terrorists that aren't willing to bargain or negotiate in reasonable terms, there is no possible "summit". The bottom line is that South Korea wants to help with the efforts of rebuilding Iraq & they will not be scared away. That cannot be blamed on the U.S. These countries do make up their own minds. If they kill their Mr. Kim like our Mr. Johnson, it WILL fuel more hatred, unfortunately, and do nothing to get the world to sympathize with Al Quaeda's efforts. I would like to hope that we can rescue Mr. Kim & the TEN other hostages they have without any innocent bloodshed. I'm hopeful, yet realistic in that the chances are pretty slim.
We've tried to "negotiate" and understand our OWN "religious nuts" - Jim Jones & David Koresh. Then we found out what horrors they were inflicting on the hundreds of trapped people under their control. They were not willing to negotiate the release of anyone, and we had no choice but to use "force". Or, should we have just walked away, minded our own business, and turned our backs on innocent women and children being raped, abused, and some even murdered for trying to escape from these evil men? (it sounds bizarre, but the Jim Jones massacre affected me so bad, that to this day I cannot drink any blue liquids - blue Pepsi, Kool-Aid, Blue Hawaiian, Curacao in tropical drinks, etc. If you know the story, you know why
We even once HELPED Saddam Hussein in Iraq, don't you guys remember? How has he repaid us when we not only showed "mercy", but even HELPED Hussein, despite not sharing the same political culture? By planning U.S. attacks?! Putin finally came forward in being honest that Bush was given Russian intelligence that Iraq (NOT Al Quaeda, IRAQ the country, folks) was planning real terrorist attacks, or acts of WAR, against the U.S., and even on our own soil??? Putin of course still opposes the war, (why shouldn't he? Iraq wasn't threatening Russia for pete's sake), but wanted to make it clear the U.S. did have a REAL THREAT of terror. I thank God he did that, even if it was to protect his own interests in Iraq (to the tune of $40 billion inked before the war). It shed more light on Bush's judgement, IMO. He has said this all along & was diplomatic enough to not reveal Russia as one of his sources, despite heavy media critisicm against this war.
If we had stood by & waited for these terrorism plans to quickly come to fruition, and lost even MORE innocent lives than 9/11, then some of you would have had Bush's head for not having done anything about the information he was given??!! It's a double-edge sword.
It's not about "revenge" - it's about saving & protecting the millions today, as well as our children from being slaves to a terrorist regime. My mother and my brother are both military officers & both fought for me. They are also both DEVOUT Christians. I'm not for war, either, BELIEVE me. However, we tried a "wait and see" mentality with Japan's threats once, remember? I've actually been to the Pearl Harbor Memorial - it's a horrible feeling when you're there, knowing all these innocent souls died at that spot below you in the ocean. Our countrywide "revenge" response at Hiroshima was even MORE catastrophic & much, much worse than if we had just acted before the Pearl Harbor massacre even happened.
Think about that applied to Iraq. I can honestly see the same, horrific response happening if the U.S. HAD fallen under attack like that again & it was at the actual hands of Iraqis (not Al Quaeda). The world would be screaming for revenge - & a hatred like no other would emerge demanding that we "vaporize" the area of Iraq.
Isn't "prevention" usually the best medicine in these cases? Gosh, it's not an easy answer, I know.....
Upvote
0