If you were the arbiter of what was likely that might be something someone would care about.
Upvote
0
Dad on Youtube
- Thread starter dad
- Start date
No idea what you are talking about. Specifics?
Yes I have evidence that you have no proof for the same state past...you can not produce it! Yet you seem to think we all must assume the position and accept that belief. No. Hell no.
NOT if that reality is not the present state one! If you're going to posit that reality from the long gone past is the same from observation of this present state, inference and deduction, you need to substantiate your assertions. Big time. Until then we can be assured God stands unchallenged and was right all along.
Upvote
0
Split Rock
Conflation of Blathers
"Until then we can be assured Dad stands unchallenged in his own mind and no where else and was right all along."
Upvote
0
PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
So why didn't it then? If the laws of physics changed it would leave traces, but we see none.
Upvote
0
Split Rock
Conflation of Blathers
You aren't seriously challenging dad's interpretation of God's Word.. are you?? He is God's One True Prophet on Earth, and his interpretation of scripture is Infallible!
Upvote
0
Strathos
No one important
- Dec 11, 2012
- 12,663
- 6,531
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Just like they noticed back then, and it was written in the Bible that all of the laws of physics and reality changed... oh wait, no it wasn't.
If you are interested in studying mental illness, you can go to an asylum, or you can just try to reason with religious persons. Coming here saves bus fare.
Last time I checked, Buddhism was a religion.
AV and Aman have explanations...
Upvote
0
Any evidence that there is a "spiritual" dimension that exists apart from nature/reality? Any supporting evidence for your concept of a "merged universe"?
You don't understand where the burden of proof lies, do you?
If you're going to claim that things were different in the past - that the natural physical constants of the universe had different properties - then you need to back up that claim. Multiple variable speed of light hypothesis have been proposed since 1907, but none of them provide a better explanation of the evidence and none have withstood testing.
All the available evidence points to the natural physical constants being either fixed or subject to incredibly slow amounts of change. For example, a 2012 study - reacting to a 2010 paper that proposed shifting fundamental constants - showed that over the last 7 billion years, the ratio of the mass of the proton to the electron changed by 0.000001%. Studies in 2002 and 2004 showed that rates of radioactive decay have exhibited no change over the past 370,000 years. Another study that the fine structure contstant has exhibited only a change in 1 part per 100 billion over that past 12.6 billion years.
Given that the universe is ~13.74 billion, then we can reasonably assert the fundamental constants are exactly that, constant, for any period of time that is important to us.
In this case, the absence of evidence really is the evidence of absence.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Ah...that is an easy one. OUR light and laws are not what changed, but are what we had as a result of the change!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
RealityCheck
Senior Veteran
Didn't answer the question.
Maybe it was too difficult to understand.
A scientist observes a bunch of stuff one day and writes it down. Everything he observed is consistent with what is established in science.
Then next week the scientist observes a bunch of stuff that contradicts what he observed last week. Nothing he observes is consistent with what's known in science. No matter how many times he observes the stuff, its contradictory every time.
Now, how does the scientist determine which of these is correct:
- the laws of science have changed
- the previous observations were flawed, and he was not observing the actual laws of science correctly, but the laws of science have not changed.
Upvote
0
RealityCheck
Senior Veteran
Wouldn't help. If you cant show any interest in your pet ideas, no one else will either.
Dont be dishonest. You've seen plenty of other explanations. You just dont agree with them.
As always, youre willing to start from an assumption that has no evidence to support it. Then you come here accusing scientists of doing the same thing while pretending your assumptions are proven facts.
Upvote
0
Split Rock
Conflation of Blathers
You must like fantasy then. I like reading fantasy too, but I recognize it for what it is.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
It is strange that every time I hear claims about "God says", I always see a person's mouth moving.
Upvote
0
He has been observing how long exactly!!?? Did you think nature changed fundamentally each week?? It would have changed long before there was any science.
Simple.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
They did not know what all that was did they, in Noah's day? They did notice a lot though, and all that I see that was noticed is noticably different than what we notice. This is what you need to notice.
Great. So?
Upvote
0
Similar threads
