Dad on Youtube

[Subduction Zone]

False. Those that chose to think God is wrong, are only showing the informed that they are wrong.

You are conflating the Bible with God again. No one said that God was wrong. We are simply pointing out the obvious that the Bible has hundreds of errors in it.

One more time, the Bible is not God.

 

[dad]

So let's see your rock-solid evidence...

"My religion is true because........

If you really wanted to know, going off on some denialist Last Thursdayism mind game would not be the way.

 

[dad]

Oh....and I almost missed this little gem...



Please indicate which diseases are caused by demons,

Name some that can't be?

because, as a good little Christian, you should be demanding an exorcism for the poor sufferers....

Or we can do like the little girl did, when they asked her what she would do if the devil came knocking on her door. She replied without hesitation..' Oh, I would just let Jesus answer it'.

 

[dad]

One more time, the Bible is not God.

How about the God of the bible?

 

[dad]

I got about four minutes in. Narrating your topic and then randomly splashing other things on the screen that don't seem to go along with what you're talking about makes it very difficult to concentrate on what you're attempting to say.
..

I might suggest listening to the audio and looking away.

 

[Subduction Zone]

How about the God of the bible?

What about him?

The Bible was written by people, not by God. People make mistakes.

You are breaking the first or second commandment by worshiping the Bible instead of God.

 

[dad]

So you are saying that the biblical witnesses weren't smart enough to find people to write for them in the language that they themselves spoke?

Who says that would have been smart? Maybe God knew what was best. Seems to have worked.

 

[dad]

The exact opposite is true. Events of such epic proportion would not go by unnoticed and undocumented. Egypt's rival nations or neighbours would have a field day and would write entire books about it.

Next to that, we should find plenty of evidence of the gigantic economic backlash such an event would have had on egyptian civilisation.

Instead, we find nothing. Nothing at all.

Only a rather vague myth in a religious book.

False. The documents of such an abject humiliation may have been purged.

 

[dad]

The Epic of Gilgamesh is older then the OT.

Nope. It may predate the official oldest copy of the scipture we have. That means little. For example, James in the NT quotes Enoch, who was contemporary with Adam. We win. Our records are also true, and proven to be from God a million ways. We have the bestest, oldest, funest, neatest and coolest records of them all!

The pagan plagerizers were after the fact.

 

[dad]

This makes no sense. By the same rationale, we could conclude that the laws of nature changed based on Spiderman comics.

Speak for yourself.

 

[dad]

What about him?

The Bible was written by people, not by God.

Not what God in the flesh said.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not what God in the flesh said.

Really? And what reliable source can we find that in?

Just to save you some time, please don't refer to a book that has already been shown to have hundreds of contradictions, bad science, and failed prophesies.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Poor dad, he is driven by his fundamentalism. Sadly his fundamentalism is also what proves he is wrong.

 

[dad]

Really? And what reliable source can we find that in?

If one is standing on the sands rather than standing on a Rock, nothing is reliable. I understand.

 

[Subduction Zone]

If one is standing on the sands rather than standing on a Rock, nothing is reliable. I understand.

I can tell, from personal experience I take it.

So why are you still standing on the sands of superstition?

 

[dad]

I can tell, from personal experience I take it.

So why are you still standing on the sands of superstition?

Well, you seem to have run out of wind in the sails pretty fast this time.

 

[morningstar2651]

What's it about?

About eight minutes and thirty seconds.

To answer dad's OP, the video isn't very engaging. The soothing background music and delivery make for a sleepy experience. The presentation lost me before the content did.

The video has 136 viewers who have watched it for a total of 4 hours. This means that the average viewer only sat through a minute and a half of your nearly nine-minute video. You should have access to some more detailed metrics that will show you exactly when everyone stops watching.

I don't know if you watch a lot of YouTube channels, but here are some good examples of what to do to have a successful video and/or channel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSzWGPyacag
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSi6YoTPWLw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OENj7Z-afhY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdFw8kvHAY8

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well, you seem to have run out of wind in the sails pretty fast this time.

What on Earth are you blabbering about?

I was simply agreeing with you that your stance on superstition is not very profitable for you at all.

 

[dad]

About eight minutes and thirty seconds.

To answer dad's OP, the video isn't very engaging. The soothing background music and delivery make for a sleepy experience. The presentation lost me before the content did.

The video has 136 viewers who have watched it for a total of 4 hours. This means that the average viewer only sat through a minute and a half of your nearly nine-minute video. You should have access to some more detailed metrics that will show you exactly when everyone stops watching.

I don't know if you watch a lot of YouTube channels, but here are some good examples of what to do to have a successful video and/or channel.
..

Could be. However I don't expect that a per click ratio would have meaning at this point. My signature is linked to the video at the moment, so those who click on it may not be there to watch.

 

[Subduction Zone]

morningstar, when it comes to YouTube videos dad's links near the bottom. Far more have watched a significant portion of this video than will ever watch dad's nonsense:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Uz1icjwrM