Alan Kleinman
Well-Known Member
- Feb 14, 2021
- 796
- 127
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Whatever^2I see that you had to strawman again. Observations of fossils can be experiments. An inability to understand this tells us that you do not understand the scientific method.
Oh boy Hans, are you going to present experimental evidence of macroevolution? Perhaps you should try and figure out how microevolution works first.
I really hope it doesn't take 2000 years to figure out that macroevolution doesn't exist. I gave Frank a number to check out where microevolution ends and macroevolution starts but he doesn't have the chops to check it out.
No need too, they reviewed the math not your evolutionary fables.Ask them.
I gave you my reasons it doesn't matter to me what you believe and name calling won't get you to where you want be.You asked me the question, I gave you the answer. If you don't have the chops to check it out,
Notwithstanding your objection common descent is the accepted science.just keep on believing that bacteria can evolve into humans.
Be patient Hans, even you can learn how to apply this math to DNA adaptive evolution. We almost have you understanding the "at least one rule" mathematics for the Kishony experiment. Did you know there is another way to model the Kishony experiment mathematically? It's a random walk process called a Markov Process. Ah, forget it, we better stick with the jr high school level math for now.
Alan has a strange notion on how to influence people and win friends.If there is a more condescending poster on this forum, I can't recall.
Whatever^2
Does that mean you aren't going to present any experimental evidence of macroevolution? Perhaps you want to use Subduction Zone's argument that observations are experiments?That's not even what the 2000 years was doing in my post.
A more appropriate analogy would be: will people still be denying evolution for ideological reasons 2000 years after it was clearly demonstrated. Alas, given your example, I suspect the answer is yes.
Now you are a mind reader. Did you learn how to do that when you learned how to read fossil tea leaves?No need too, they reviewed the math not your evolutionary fables.
I got your reason, you are chicken.I gave you my reasons it doesn't matter to me what you believe and name calling won't get you to where you want be.
I'm presenting the correct thermodynamics and mathematics of this physical process.
Condescending with the correct physical and mathematical explanation of biological evolution. Would you care to make a guess at why it took 30 years for the Lenski populations to accumulate about 100 adaptive mutations? That's 500,000,000 million replications/day * 365days/year * 30 years! And Lenski ran his experiment in parallel * 12.If there is a more condescending poster on this forum, I can't recall.
Oh no, Frank! OK, reptiles evolve into birds and fish evolve into mammals. Can we be friends now? Speaking of birds, you know that saying, what came first, the chicken or the egg? Shouldn't it be, what came first, two chickens or the egg?Alan has a strange notion on how to influence people and win friends.
Condescending with the correct physical and mathematical explanation of biological evolution. Would you care to make a guess at why it took 30 years for the Lenski populations to accumulate about 100 adaptive mutations? That's 500,000,000 million replications/day * 365days/year * 30 years! And Lenski ran his experiment in parallel * 12.
Somebody do signature verification on that ballot.
Let your light shine.Do you actually read the specific posts you reply to, or do you just push forward your agenda willy-nilly? The post I was replying to was extremely condescending to me regarding your perception of my mathematical skills. For the record, you do not know my mathematical skills.
Let your light shine.
Too bad, and I actually started to think that you understood the Kishony experiment. Perhaps you do and don't want to admit it.you ain't worth it
Too bad, and I actually started to think that you understood the Kishony experiment. Perhaps you do and don't want to admit it.
Does that mean you are heading back to the peanut gallery on this thread, if so Adios?
Perhaps you want to use Subduction Zone's argument that observations are experiments?
I was going to say, thanks for the offer. But why not? Tell us what is evidence and what isn't. Let's see if I can remember anything from my psychiatry lectures in medical school. I hope we don't have to 5150 you.
Does that mean you aren't going to present any experimental evidence of macroevolution? Perhaps you want to use Subduction Zone's argument that observations are experiments?
I'm not denying evolution, I'm presenting the correct thermodynamics and mathematics of this physical process. Of course, I use observation for my evidence, observation of experiments. It's real, it's measurable, and it's repeatable! How many times does Kishony have to repeat his experiment for you to believe it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?