Creationists are told the flood is true and actually happened,

AV1611VET · Oct 20, 2009

Thistlethorn said:
Please show a peer-reviewed paper...

Please show a peer-reviewed paper...

Please show a peer-reviewed paper...

All a 'peer-reviewed paper' is, is a document declaring the winner of a knock-down, drag-out, convocation of whitecoats.

Loudmouth · Oct 20, 2009

juvenissun said:
But it is not easy. Most ( >95%) people do not understand it. That is why all of you are laughing here.

We understand it just fine. We laugh because of the gullibility it requires to believe such a tale.

Loudmouth · Oct 20, 2009

juvenissun said:
I give you clues, you go and search by keywords. I am not teaching kindergarten kids.

All serious literatures are very specified. If you really like to see a research article, be specific on what you want to see.

Only a kindergartner would be so coy. It's like asking a child what happened to the ice cream. All we get is stories.

Thistlethorn · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
All a 'peer-reviewed paper' is, is a document declaring the winner of a knock-down, drag-out, convocation of whitecoats.

That's a sad (and erroneous) view of the scientific process.

Cabal · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
All a 'peer-reviewed paper' is, is a document declaring the winner of a knock-down, drag-out, convocation of whitecoats.

WERE YOU THERE?

HUH?

AV1611VET · Oct 20, 2009

Thistlethorn said:
That's a sad (and erroneous) view of the scientific process.

I believe peer-reviewing is just one segment of the 'scientific process'?

If I wanted to give a sad view of the 'scientific process', I'd QV this (for about the 10th time): 74 .

Cabal · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
I believe peer-reviewing is just one segment of the 'scientific process'?

If I wanted to give a sad view of the 'scientific process', I'd QV this (for about the 10th time): 74 .

And it's wrong. For at least the 10th time.

Wedjat · Oct 20, 2009

That is a sad (and erroneous) view of a segment of the scientific process.

feel better now? doesn't make it any less sad.

AV1611VET · Oct 20, 2009

Wedjat said:
That is a sad (and erroneous) view of a segment of the scientific process.

feel better now? doesn't make it any less sad.

You ever been to one?

LifeToTheFullest! · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
All a 'peer-reviewed paper' is, is a document declaring the winner of a knock-down, drag-out, convocation of whitecoats.

That's all it is, really? I had no idea.

Thistlethorn · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
You ever been to one?

Been to a what?

Wedjat · Oct 20, 2009

You do realize it's not an event.

"Hey Dr. Todd, you coming to the peer review cookout tomorrow?"
"Should I bring drinks?"
"What kind of question is that? Of course you should bring drinks. Oh and don't forget your bathing suit, Dr. Brink has a pool."

MoonLancer · Oct 20, 2009

lol. av has tragically shot himself in the face, again.

AV1611VET · Oct 20, 2009

MoonLancer said:
lol. av has tragically shot himself in the face, again.

Funny you should say that.

I was about to post this: 123.

Notice the avatar?

[Note: And yes, Thaumaturgy denies it.]

Cabal · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
Funny you should say that.

I was about to post this: 123.

Notice the avatar?

Funny, I was about to post this. http://www.christianforums.com/t7394133-13/#post52717702

And that's fire, btw.

AV1611VET · Oct 20, 2009

Cabal said:
And that's fire, btw.

If it is, it's funny-looking fire.

And for the record, I'm not enjoying this conversation, guys.

Cabal · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
If it is, it's funny-looking fire.

It's fire.

And for the record, I'm not enjoying this conversation, guys.

Given the number of times you pulled a where-you-there? on us and yet are quite willing to spew innuendo about peer review, a process you've never taken part in, and what other posters have said about it, neither are many people here I expect - to say nothing of all the other times you derail threads.

gaara4158 · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
Funny you should say that.

I was about to post this: 123.

Notice the avatar?

[Note: And yes, Thaumaturgy denies it.]

So if an alternative to the facts is even dreamed of and put somewhere on the internet, AV automatically gets a clever hunch that it's true. If it's denied, that's just evidence of the massive cover-up you suspect is going on. [incredulous scolding goes here]

AV1611VET · Oct 20, 2009

gaara4158 said:
So if an alternative to the facts is even dreamed of and put somewhere on the internet, AV automatically gets a clever hunch that it's true. If it's denied, that's just evidence of the massive cover-up you suspect is going on. [incredulous scolding goes here]

Well, I'm leaving this thread anyways, and I just might walk out on Physical & Life Sciences and Creation & Evolution for awhile, as well.

Cabal · Oct 20, 2009

AV1611VET said:
Well, I'm leaving this thread anyways, and I just might walk out on Physical & Life Sciences and Creation & Evolution for awhile, as well.

Does this mean we're about to see the first instance of "/board"?

Creationists are told the flood is true and actually happened,

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Contributor

Contributor

Defeated dad.

Well-Known Member

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

Spirited Apostate

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

Defeated dad.

Spirited Apostate

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

Gen Alpha Dad

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency