Creation stands

[toff]

Oh boy. I just actually downloaded and listened to one of Hovind's radio shows (gimme a break, I'm really bored at work). What a tragic thing it is. The one that I listened to started off with Hovind telling a few blatant lies before he read some letters from his listeners. All of these letters praised him, his 'ministry' and his 'educational' material. I am terribly saddened that there are so many ignorant people in the world.

 

[Data]

Where do we find the radio shows? I'm in the mood for a laugh.

[edit] Ah, found it. It's on the main page.

 

[Data]

Holy ****. Look what I just found.


http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=homeschool

Text books by Kent Hovind.

D:

 

[LorentzHA]

LOL, I knew I would get a fast response. Evos hate Kent, why do you think some ect..ect..(a lot) of evo professors wont debate him.

Josh

They won't debate him because he does not address real points, he plays to the emotions of his highly UNeducated audience. (not trying to mean, just stating truth)

 

[LorentzHA]

How dare you insult Donald Duck like that by comparing him to Hovind

Hey there! Welcome back!!

 

[armed2010]

Hey there! Welcome back!!

Great to be back!!

 

[LorentzHA]

Josh-Kent Hovind is not a scientist, not a Dr. in any respect, and the way he lies to people I could not even call him a Christian. He does not have a degree in ANY science; infact he does not have a real degree. He bought his degree from a degree mill. What exactly is it that you admire about this man-Is it simply that he tells you what you want to hear? His ideas are not founded in any true science.

 

[Arikay]

Ive been listening to the one I downloaded, and I have to say, listening to it is very entertaining. To take a shorter amount of time, I often listen to it on fast forward, which turns Hovind into a chipmunk. Very entertaining indeed.

 

[Philosoft]

I would also love to see someone defend their position in public. Evolutionist that agree to debate him get my respect, because at least they believe so strongly that they are willing to stand up for it.

What makes you think sound-biting science for public consumption lends any legitimacy whatsoever? Science can't be easily summarized. That's why people who wish to do science have to go to school, rather than watch PBS and the Discovery Channel.

I have never been accused of being closed minded(well maybe once,LOL).

I'm sure Hovind says the same thing.

 

[USincognito]

I would also love to see someone defend their position in public. Evolutionist that agree to debate him get my respect, because at least they believe so strongly that they are willing to stand up for it. I will probally reply to anything else tomorrow. I am no science major, but I will read it if thats what you want to hear. I have never been accused of being closed minded(well maybe once,LOL).

Kent Hovind refuses to debate. Unless you count his suckers bet $250,000,000,000,000,000.00 "challenge." The evidence of Hovind's cowardice is all over the web. He refuses written debate because he can't be gilb and fast and loose with the truth before a packed audience. Again, as shown all over the web:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=hovind+lies
as soon as he writes his b.s. down, it's ripped to shreds.

 

[Jet Black]

o someone mentioned hovind:

http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Pier/1766/hovindlies/

 

[Data]

LOL, I knew I would get a fast response. Evos hate Kent, why do you think some ect..ect..(a lot) of evo professors wont debate him.

Why do you think Kent won't debate any evo professors in a written debate? He always declines.

If anything, answer this question. Please.

 

[Arthur Dietrich]

Armed-chan: You know, I watched that little gif of yours for about...5 minutes (whilst listening to a fast paced song). It's so addictive 0.0



Anyway...

I think it ought to be pointed out that "evos" aren't the only one who know this guy is a fraud. Many creationists and creationist groups consider him an embarassment. The ones that haven't lost their self respect, that is.

 

[Meatros]

LOL, I knew I would get a fast response. Evos hate Kent, why do you think some ect..ect..(a lot) of evo professors wont debate him.

Josh

So you are a disciple of hovind, eh?

Not interested in learning anything about evolution, so that you don't appear to be completely ignorant, eh?

Good luck with listening to Hovind. I'm curious, do you believe his other inane conspiracy theories as well?

 

[Dal M.]

Yes, creationism stands. So do zombies; both have taken fatal hit after fatal hit over the centuries, but refuse, against all evidence, to lie down and admit they're dead. And both have an alarming tendency to eat brains.

 

[MartinM]

And both have an alarming tendency to eat brains.

But unlike the zombies, creationism will be forever hungry.

 

[Dal M.]

Oh, I don't know-- you never see a zombie rub its belly contentedly, loosen its belt, and lay down for a nap.

 

[Phred]

I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

Yes you do, as in the original post.

 

[Bushido216]

http://www.geocities.com/kenthovind/

 

[Mechanical Bliss]

Apparently Josh1 didn't learn from the first time around where he advocated Hovind while admitting that the scientific refutations of Hovind's claims that he pasted were "over [his] head" and that he would leave the scientific discussions to the oral debates by Hovind rather than actually discussing why Hovind's claims were wrong. Hovind's reputation, lack of science degree, propensity for lying/making false claims, refusal to engage in written debates, refusal to try to publish his claims in the scientific literature, willingness to engage in oral debates with audiences stacked with uneducated people (thus "preaching to the choir" effectively), and desire to only engage in oral debates because of his ability to sway the audience by emotion rather than science were all previously discussed, and apparently ignored, by Josh1.

http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=1071275#post1071275

Perhaps you would like to bring up specific claims again and we can refute them again as with the flood topic? It's already clear that Hovind's credibility is zilch.