john crawford said:
Science is limited to human observation until it engages in religious speculation.
The root of theory is Theos.
Evolution is science fiction at its best.
Unfortunately, evolution does not engage in religious speculation. Most creationists think so, but that is because creationism is a scientific theory based on religious speculation. Sauce for the goose.
Some evolution
ists do engage in religious speculation. Dawkins comes to mind. However, the correct way to handle this is to show that they personally are off the scientific reservation and evolution won't back their religious speculations.
Darwin was an old-fashioned English sexist and a bloody racist and you know it. (or should).
Darwin was neither a sexist nor a racist. Particularly the latter. He constantly fought against slavery and protested the racist policies of the Spanish in S. America. You should know this. Any biography of Darwin will document this. Read one. Desmond and Moore's
Darwin is one of the best.
This is not an anti-Christian forum. If you mock believers in God then you may be rightfully called anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and anti-Islamic.
Some of us question whether Biblical literalists are believers in God or worshippers of the Bible.
Evolution is a scientific hoax and a lie. Anyone who promotes it is anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and anti-Islamic.
LOL!! You obviously haven't been reading what Christian ministers say, have you? Also, I have been in 5 synagogues over the years of each division in Judaism and in each of them the commentary in the pew Torah says Genesis is not literal.
BTW, you are aware, aren't you, that of the 26 plaintiffs against creationism (and for evolution) in the 1982 MacLean vs Arkansas trial, 23 were ministers or rabbis? Including the Catholic, Methodist, and African-Methodist bishops of Arkansas?
See here for religious denominations supporting evolution. Who knows? Yours may be among them.
http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/9375_statements_from_religious_orga_12_19_2002.asp