Creation ex nihilo challenge

[AV1611VET]

That's not a mistake, even by KJVO standards.

Funny ... he was honest enough to admit it.

Why can't you?

 

[Delphiki]

Funny ... he was honest enough to admit it.

Why can't you?

The mistake was so small and irrelevant, I'm not surprised he didn't notice it. It was literally just a letter 's', and it didn't change the argument or point being made at all, but you, as always, will do anything to distract from the point because you are a forum troll.

 

[CabVet]

We have evidence that the laws of physics did not exist prior to the Big Bang.

And for "evidence" you cite:

What came before the big bang? - Boing Boing

That link has no evidence for what you are saying. The link says, and I quote "There was no such epoch as “before the big bang,” because time began with the big bang". Your original sentence implies that there was a time before the big bang when physical laws didn't exist. The article does not. Try again?

 

[Oncedeceived]

And for "evidence" you cite:

What came before the big bang? - Boing Boing

That link has no evidence for what you are saying. The link says, and I quote "There was no such epoch as “before the big bang,” because time began with the big bang". Your original sentence implies that there was a time before the big bang when physical laws didn't exist. The article does not. Try again?

Seriously. Ok, my bad there was no before the Big Bang. That better.

 

[AV1611VET]

The mistake was so small and irrelevant, I'm not surprised he didn't notice it. It was literally just a letter 's',

What does Paul say here about putting a letter 's' on the end of a word?

Galatians 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.

 

[CabVet]

Seriously. Ok, my bad there was no before the Big Bang. That better.

No, not better, just in agreement with the article you posted to support you. But that doesn't really matter, does it?

 

[CabVet]

What does Paul say here about putting a letter 's' on the end of a word?

Galatians 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.

Unrelated Bible verse of the day?

 

[bhsmte]

Unrelated Bible verse of the day?

More like, unrelated bible verse of the hour.

 

[Oncedeceived]

No, not better, just in agreement with the article you posted to support you. But that doesn't really matter, does it?

Of course it matters. Why wouldn't it?

 

[CabVet]

Of course it matters. Why wouldn't it?

You posted an article that didn't support your argument. When you were showed that fact, you simply changed the argument. So, the argument didn't matter.

 

[Oncedeceived]

You posted an article that didn't support your argument. When you were showed that fact, you simply changed the argument. So, the argument didn't matter.

Not true. I conveyed my claim in a poor way. The laws of physics were not prior to the Big Bang because there was no prior. It is obvious what my intent was.

 

[CabVet]

Not true. I conveyed my claim in a poor way. The laws of physics were not prior to the Big Bang because there was no prior. It is obvious what my intent was.

Obvious only to you. To me, there is a tremendous difference between having a time with no physical laws and not having it.

 

[Delphiki]

Not true. I conveyed my claim in a poor way. The laws of physics were not prior to the Big Bang because there was no prior. It is obvious what my intent was.

Oh yeah... That was totally obvious coming from a creationist.

/sarcasm

 

[Oncedeceived]

Obvious only to you. To me, there is a tremendous difference between having a time with no physical laws and not having it.

I have repeatedly shown evidence that time and space, matter and energy were none existence before the Big Bang. You can think whatever fits best with your desire to dismiss anything that is said.

 

[Oncedeceived]

/sarcasm

The word sarcasm was not needed the implication was evident.

 

[Loudmouth]

I have repeatedly shown evidence that time and space, matter and energy were none existence before the Big Bang.

I can show that Hawaii was non-existent 4.5 billion years ago. That doesn't mean that Hawaii had to be created by a supernatural deity, although it is quite heavenly.

 

[Oncedeceived]

I can show that Hawaii was non-existent 4.5 billion years ago. That doesn't mean that Hawaii had to be created by a supernatural deity, although it is quite heavenly.

That is 100% correct.

 

[CabVet]

I have repeatedly shown evidence

Link(s)?

 

[Loudmouth]

That is 100% correct.

Therefore, being non-existent and then existent in no way indicates a supernatural origin, correct?

 

[Oncedeceived]

Therefore, being non-existent and then existent in no way indicates a supernatural origin, correct?

Twist away.