Conservatism in the church, and women's roles

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
women being second class people is the traditional conservative role
It actually has nothing to do with conservatism. It's the historic role, if you want to put it that way, but that's different. Incidentally, you could hardly have a worse example of an attitude towards women, marriage, and family than Karl Marx and I hope we all can agree that he's not a conservative.

the environmental movement was a liberal movement. The conservatives didn’t want to clean up the air or the water .
Actually, much has been written by conservatives about the importance of CONSERVING the environment. The Industrial Revolution, which did much damage to the environment, was viewed as a horror by conservatives, but was 'progress' in the eyes of the profit-oriented liberals of the age.

I remember that river bursting into flame because of the pollution. The civil rights movements are liberal movements. Conservatives wanted minorities to wait and wait and wait until Johnson realized minorities were tired of waiting for fair treatment and were prevented from even asking for it by unfair voting practices .
I guess that's why it was the Republicans who passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act over the objections of the Democratic leadership in the Senate, huh?
 
Upvote 0

Junia

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
2,795
1,387
42
Bristol
✟31,159.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Thanks. I also got a similar reply from a moderately conservative Baptist on another forum, whose opinions I tend to agree with and respect.

Basically, the ones my dad and I disagree with, more often than not are hyperconservative Calvinists, Pentecostals, etc. who get really into the patriarchal thing. Think John Piper, Doug Phillips, Doug Wilson, etc. They go well beyond "women cannot be pastors" and think women shouldn't lead in civil spheres, work, etc. Women should stay at home only per them.

I am the same. I don't believe it a sin for women to work or vote or have careers other than pastors. I do think it mAkes sense for a wife and mother to keep her home and young children as the focus as many women get exhausted having it all, but I would be careful as saying that is a hard and fast rule

I believe those women who are single or aren't mothers can do as they please as long S they aren't sinning e.g. Fornicating, adultery, etc

Not all women feel called to marriage or motherhood and a single woman needs a means to support herself
 
Upvote 0

Brightmoon

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.
Mar 2, 2018
6,297
5,539
NYC
✟151,950.00
Country
United States
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I really wasn’t raised by a religious conservatives. Pop was just a run of the mill 1950s immature misogynist. I grew up in NYC too . NYC has this wonderful amalgam of different people doing wonderful creative things . I was prevented from participating. It galled because my cousins did it all. . It especially galled because my father wouldn’t have accepted the limitations put on him by being a Black man during the 1950s yet he turned right around and blighted all of his daughters’ lives by restricting our lives in the exact same way.
 
Upvote 0

Brightmoon

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.
Mar 2, 2018
6,297
5,539
NYC
✟151,950.00
Country
United States
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It actually has nothing to do with conservatism. It's the historic role, if you want to put it that way, but that's different. Incidentally, you could hardly have a worse example of an attitude towards women, marriage, and family than Karl Marx and I hope we all can agree that he's not a conservative.


Actually, much has been written by conservatives about the importance of CONSERVING the environment. The Industrial Revolution, which did much damage to the environment, was viewed as a horror by conservatives, but was 'progress' in the eyes of the profit-oriented liberals of the age.


I guess that's why it was the Republicans who passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act over the objections of the Democratic leadership in the Senate, huh?
. I’m old enough to remember the Southern Dixiecrats . Modern day republicans are acting the same way they did . Nice try but no! I remember the environmental movement of the late 60s . When large businesses realized that people were willing to boycott their business over this, thats when things started changing
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Brightmoon

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.
Mar 2, 2018
6,297
5,539
NYC
✟151,950.00
Country
United States
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Apparently, "conservatism" is the whipping boy of preference, no matter what the particular issue might be. But here's something to think about...

When someone dares to criticize socialism, the howls of protest are long and loud. Unless every jot and tittle of a definition is agreed upon, the response is going to be "No, that's not socialism! You are misrepresenting socialism."

But conservatism? Oh, anything, everything, and anybody whom the speaker finds disagreeble, well...that's conservative.

:destroyed:
. And socialism is just a buzz word nowadays used by ignorant people who don’t really understand it. Public schools, public highways, firefighters, public hospitals, police, bridges, tunnels, paved streets. Regulatory restrictions for safety , traffic regulations are all socialist . You don’t see it because you’ve been gaslighted into giving a knee jerk reaction to a word
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
. I’m old enough to remember the Southern Dixiecrats . Modern day republicans are acting the same way they did . Nice try but no!

Now...that's just laughable. It's not for no reason that blacks have responded favorably to Trump's policies like no other Republican president in recent years...and that strikes you as happening because today's Republicans are like the Dixiecrats???
 
Upvote 0

Brightmoon

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.
Mar 2, 2018
6,297
5,539
NYC
✟151,950.00
Country
United States
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Now...that's just laughable. It's not for no reason that blacks have responded favorably to Trump's policies like no other Republican president in recent years...and that strikes you as happening because today's Republicans are like the Dixiecrats???
. Even intelligent people can be brainwashed ( shrug)
 
Upvote 0

Sketcher

Born Imperishable
Feb 23, 2004
38,984
9,401
✟380,259.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I don't spend as much time on Internet forums as much as I used to, and I expect to even less after my 36th birthday on November 9 -- but I wanted this to be my last substantive thread before I seek to largely retire from such discussions, and before husband and I plan on having a child next year.

Ok. So conservatism in the church, and women's roles, is probably one of the most difficult topics to address. Men's opinions actually vary quite widely, and so it's not always liberal feminism that brings in confusion -- men themselves are not monolithic in their views when it comes to this topic, and this is where things get confusing.

For example, let's take my dad. He loves Trump, he considers himself conservative, but he's not into the controlling, moralistic version of conservatism. When conservative men want dress codes for women and complain about Super Bowl halftime shows, he thinks such things are silly -- he says this is what people thought about Elvis in the 1950s, and he thinks they were wrong then, too. He absolutely does not have an ideal that we should return to 1950s June Cleaver womanhood; he never has considered such things important, and so when I ask him about such things, he always says, "You need to avoid extremist cults."

My dad has also never been a churchgoing, theological hair-splitting kind of guy. He believes one should read the Bible, pray to God, have conversations with God, and come to their own conclusions. Again, he's not big on morality; when I asked him once why he doesn't moralize the way other conservative men do (talking about women's roles, abortion, etc.), he said, "I don't know. I guess it's not in me." Despite admiring Billy Graham, he'd never heard of the Billy Graham rule. He had nothing stern to teach about sexual immorality; he doesn't think premarital sex is a sin. When a conservative friend of mine once went on about remarriage after divorce being a perpetual sin, my dad said, "That's just someone being self-righteous. Avoid the cults."

As far as women's roles, I just never heard much about that growing up. I never heard about dress codes. My parents I think were broadly against women being pastors, but they didn't get very doctrinal about it. My dad said, "Women pastors just tend to be weird." I later did my own Bible study, and agreed women shouldn't be pastors -- indeed, I've posted about that a few times here, and to Reddit -- but I don't necessarily think women cannot do many other things in the civic sphere, and that's where many other kinds of conservatives have disagreement.

Like right now here in the USA, we have Amy Coney Barrett. She's Catholic, not Protestant, and she has a high authoritative rank, so she's more than just a mother. I've seen varying degrees of conservative support for her. Some admire her, but others would say, she should stay at home, not have judicial authority, etc. Others might contend, well, she's not Protestant, so she's not a real Christian (I was always taught that some individual Catholics are saved, despite their excessive works emphasis and veneration of Mary, even if Catholicism as a whole misses the mark a lot more often that Protestantism).

Another thing that got me in trouble with male authorities is that I married an unbeliever. Actually my dad got in a lot more trouble than I did, for he allowed it and thought it was fine. He and I had disagreements with other Christians over how 1 Cor 7 should be interpreted. The most conservative people believe Paul only allowed it for that time because the women were already married to unbelieving men at the time, and that he didn't intend for it to be a principle for later Christians to follow. My dad and I don't qualify it to that extent -- we take Paul at his word -- so we had no issues with my marriage. But my dad did get a lot of conservative men trying to fight his authority on this for a number of years, and he had to remind them that he was MY father, that these other men had no authority over me. I've since been with my unbelieving spouse now for a number of years, and our marriage is a happy one. I contrast this with many other conservative men who frequently post to these and other forums with complaints about how their women deny them sex and other silliness. Some of these men and women would think they're much more knowledgeable or moralistic than my father and I about marriage, but their marriages are lousy, so who are they to think they have more authority on this subject than my father and I, or think they have more insight into what Paul said than my father and I do?

Suffice to say, my family and I -- despite being fairly conservative -- don't always fit neatly into what conservative churches and people expect when it comes to the specifics of the faith, especially gender roles. While we may agree that women shouldn't be pastors, we don't buy into most of the other views, doctrines, and stereotypes that conservatives have about this broad subject. And this has continued to amaze me well into my thirties now.
"Conservative" needs to be clarified for the purposes of fruitful discussion. There are several ways one can be liberal, moderate, or conservative.

Theologically conservative - Believes the Bible, and holds to its teachings. You will not find these people claiming that there is more than one way for people to get to Heaven or justifying homosexual relationships, for instance.

Socially conservative - Believes in preserving our social institutions. Dad works, Mom takes care of the kids, both stay together, nobody does drugs or is promiscuous, etc.

Politically conservative - How closely someone wants to hold to the Constitution, and how much capitalism they embrace. These people want to keep the government small, let the market do as much as it can, and protect the Bill of Rights. Ron Paul is a decent example.

I'm pretty far to the right politically, but there are people further to the political right than I am who are socially moderate and very theologically liberal.

I'm also far more easygoing than some self-styled centrists out there. Politically, they're moderate, but in terms of attitude? Heck no. They believe there can't be good people who disagree with them - not "moderate" at all, even if they're dead center politically.

So, political, social, theological, attitude - think of each of these as a slider, and people who are all the way on one can be the other way on another, and mid-way on another.

As far as where I'm at on gender roles, I lean complementarian, but I'm not strict about it. I believe each gender has roles that they must have competency in, but if they're good at other things, they should be free to pursue those too. Women can change tires, but every able-bodied man must be able to change a tire. Men can clean, but if a woman isn't as good as a man at cleaning (with the possible exception of trained professionals), she needs to step it up and clean well. I believe that if there's no flexibility here, then there's a love deficit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NerdGirl
Upvote 0

Brightmoon

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.
Mar 2, 2018
6,297
5,539
NYC
✟151,950.00
Country
United States
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
According to Sketchers ideas I’m Theologically liberal , toxic behavior that was accepted in biblical times is not acceptable now . I accept mainstream science over biblical ideas of how nature originated and how it behaves
Socially liberal i accept stable relationships including same sex ones. but not open marriages or polygamy. I don’t believe in fixed sex roles as I think they’re silly.
Politically liberal , governments should try to fix social wrongs
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
30,685
18,560
Orlando, Florida
✟1,262,974.00
Country
United States
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Politics
US-Democrat
@kdm1984 I am of a different political persuasion but I think your dad has good advice as far as religion goes. Avoiding overly ideologically rigid groups with simplistic worldviews is generally a good idea.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

kdm1984

WELS
Oct 8, 2016
309
366
SW MO, USA
✟38,896.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm theologically quite conservative, socially moderately conservative, politically centrist (American Solidarity Party)

My dad believes Jesus is the only way people can get to heaven, but that people can be saved after they die, that hell isn't eternal, and never stresses the moral aspects of the Bible much ever. He'd be theologically moderate at best. Socially he's moderate at best too. Politically, I think he just likes Trump; I don't know where he stands on capitalism, Bill of Rights etc. Honestly he's a light hearted and fun loving guy and has never been good at the kind of "men take moral charge and be HORTATORY!" sort that many ultraconservative Reformed types are (9 Marks, CREC, Vision Forum, ATI, Paul Washer etc.). He just loves guys like Trump and Hugh Hefner and has conversations with Jesus and reads the Bible according to what he thinks and not what any other teacher or leader thinks. That's why it's been so hard for me to engage in conservative Biblical patriarchy type circles because he just isn't really like the conservative men I see in them. He thinks those types are cultic and legalistic while they think he's immoral and not an example of a strong moral male leader. (If I had a dime for every time someone has said "I can't believe your dad taught that..." which happened again yesterday in fact, I'd have lots of dimes. But being the easygoing guy he is, again he just ignores these types, thinks they're legalistic)
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don't spend as much time on Internet forums as much as I used to, and I expect to even less after my 36th birthday on November 9 -- but I wanted this to be my last substantive thread before I seek to largely retire from such discussions, and before husband and I plan on having a child next year.

Ok. So conservatism in the church, and women's roles, is probably one of the most difficult topics to address. Men's opinions actually vary quite widely, and so it's not always liberal feminism that brings in confusion -- men themselves are not monolithic in their views when it comes to this topic, and this is where things get confusing.

For example, let's take my dad. He loves Trump, he considers himself conservative, but he's not into the controlling, moralistic version of conservatism. When conservative men want dress codes for women and complain about Super Bowl halftime shows, he thinks such things are silly -- he says this is what people thought about Elvis in the 1950s, and he thinks they were wrong then, too. He absolutely does not have an ideal that we should return to 1950s June Cleaver womanhood; he never has considered such things important, and so when I ask him about such things, he always says, "You need to avoid extremist cults."

My dad has also never been a churchgoing, theological hair-splitting kind of guy. He believes one should read the Bible, pray to God, have conversations with God, and come to their own conclusions. Again, he's not big on morality; when I asked him once why he doesn't moralize the way other conservative men do (talking about women's roles, abortion, etc.), he said, "I don't know. I guess it's not in me." Despite admiring Billy Graham, he'd never heard of the Billy Graham rule. He had nothing stern to teach about sexual immorality; he doesn't think premarital sex is a sin. When a conservative friend of mine once went on about remarriage after divorce being a perpetual sin, my dad said, "That's just someone being self-righteous. Avoid the cults."

As far as women's roles, I just never heard much about that growing up. I never heard about dress codes. My parents I think were broadly against women being pastors, but they didn't get very doctrinal about it. My dad said, "Women pastors just tend to be weird." I later did my own Bible study, and agreed women shouldn't be pastors -- indeed, I've posted about that a few times here, and to Reddit -- but I don't necessarily think women cannot do many other things in the civic sphere, and that's where many other kinds of conservatives have disagreement.

Like right now here in the USA, we have Amy Coney Barrett. She's Catholic, not Protestant, and she has a high authoritative rank, so she's more than just a mother. I've seen varying degrees of conservative support for her. Some admire her, but others would say, she should stay at home, not have judicial authority, etc. Others might contend, well, she's not Protestant, so she's not a real Christian (I was always taught that some individual Catholics are saved, despite their excessive works emphasis and veneration of Mary, even if Catholicism as a whole misses the mark a lot more often that Protestantism).

Another thing that got me in trouble with male authorities is that I married an unbeliever. Actually my dad got in a lot more trouble than I did, for he allowed it and thought it was fine. He and I had disagreements with other Christians over how 1 Cor 7 should be interpreted. The most conservative people believe Paul only allowed it for that time because the women were already married to unbelieving men at the time, and that he didn't intend for it to be a principle for later Christians to follow. My dad and I don't qualify it to that extent -- we take Paul at his word -- so we had no issues with my marriage. But my dad did get a lot of conservative men trying to fight his authority on this for a number of years, and he had to remind them that he was MY father, that these other men had no authority over me. I've since been with my unbelieving spouse now for a number of years, and our marriage is a happy one. I contrast this with many other conservative men who frequently post to these and other forums with complaints about how their women deny them sex and other silliness. Some of these men and women would think they're much more knowledgeable or moralistic than my father and I about marriage, but their marriages are lousy, so who are they to think they have more authority on this subject than my father and I, or think they have more insight into what Paul said than my father and I do?

Suffice to say, my family and I -- despite being fairly conservative -- don't always fit neatly into what conservative churches and people expect when it comes to the specifics of the faith, especially gender roles. While we may agree that women shouldn't be pastors, we don't buy into most of the other views, doctrines, and stereotypes that conservatives have about this broad subject. And this has continued to amaze me well into my thirties now.

In high school I dated a girl in Seminary who now has her own church. I don't give such restrictions any thought at all. They are not from God. Here she is:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Brightmoon
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
20,539
17,698
USA
✟953,431.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
According the Sketcher’s example I’m:

Theologically Conservative. But I don’t follow a specific tradition.

Socially Conservative. If I wasn’t called to the marketplace I’d be home indulging my inner Marie and Martha. I have no issue with women who prefer to work.

Politically Conservative. I fit his example to a tee. If you feel differently that’s fine.

Yours in His Service,

~Bella
 
Upvote 0

kdm1984

WELS
Oct 8, 2016
309
366
SW MO, USA
✟38,896.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have to say that this particular forum has given the most thoughtful feedback overall of the forums I posted this to. It interested me that, on a conservative Christian subreddit, I received mostly negative replies. Nonetheless, there's a fundamental issue I want to address that perhaps wasn't clear enough in my original post, and which hasn't been addressed much yet: female obedience to male headship and authority in Christian families.

The point is that I've had difficulty in conservative Christian circles because of my father's teachings, many of which aren't accepted in the conservative Christian churches (though my father considers himself conservative). Knowing that the Bible expects daughters to obey fathers, and men in authority in general, this naturally creates some confusion: what to obey? Who to obey?

There are a number of movements these days in conservative Christian circles, such as the Stay At Home Daughters movement, council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood etc. that steer women away from feminism, independent thinking, and back to submissiveness. With this in mind, what's wrong with me obeying my father even if you think he's incorrect? Which Biblical principle should thus be taught more clearly or emphasized to the greater degree: obey male authorities, or obey some greater abstract truth?

A number of people have told me, obey the Bible, not your father. Your father teaches incorrect things. But he was my male authority, and to go against him would in and of itself be going against the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

NerdGirl

The untamed daughter
Apr 14, 2020
2,651
3,104
USA
✟65,654.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
God comes first in all things.

If any man in a position of headship tries to lead you into something that goes against the ultimate authority of all (God), you aren't bound to follow, in my opinion.

A man who is truly channeling God's righteousness, love, gentleness, strength, etc... will inspire others to follow.

A man who has to browbeat and throw his masculinity around in an attempt to coerce women into doing what he says, is not worthy of being followed or obeyed.

Bottom line: Christian women serve God, not men.

Ephesians 5:22-24 (emphasis mine)
22 Wives, obey your husbands as you obey the Lord.

23 The husband is the head of the wife, just as Christ is the head of the church people. The church is his body and he saved it.

24 Wives should obey their husbands in everything, just as the church people obey Christ.


Obedience to Christ always supersedes.

A father and his child are a unique situation, however. A child is subject to her parents as part of God's way, and I don't think it's useful to blame a child for following her parents' guidance, at least until she's old enough to make her own decisions.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

kdm1984

WELS
Oct 8, 2016
309
366
SW MO, USA
✟38,896.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God comes first in all things.

If any man in a position of headship tries to lead you into something that goes against the ultimate authority of all (God), you aren't bound to follow, in my opinion.

A man who is truly channeling God's righteousness, love, gentleness, strength, etc... will inspire others to follow.

A man who has to browbeat and throw his masculinity around in an attempt to coerce women into doing what he says, is not worthy of being followed or obeyed.

Bottom line: Christian women serve God, not men.

Ephesians 5:22-24 (emphasis mine)
22 Wives, obey your husbands as you obey the Lord.

23 The husband is the head of the wife, just as Christ is the head of the church people. The church is his body and he saved it.

24 Wives should obey their husbands in everything, just as the church people obey Christ.


Obedience to Christ always supersedes.

A father and his child are a unique situation, however. A child is subject to her parents as part of God's way, and I don't think it's useful to blame a child for following her parents' guidance, at least until she's old enough to make her own decisions.

Thanks! What age do you think that is? The Stay At Home Daughters movement, which one of my old online Calvinist friends was a big believer in, taught that women must obey fathers so long as they are unmarried and under his roof. That means if a thirtysomething isn't married yet, and is still in the father's home, his word is to be followed.

As with many other conservative Christians, these groups will also talk about truth a lot, though. And that begs the question that you answered: God's Word, or family man's authority? Few men think beyond the principle to apply it to the numerous practical situations I included in my OP. There seems to be an assumption that all conservative Bible believing men agree on every last thing in life and will thus lead daughters and wives into perfect womanhood if they just submit to everything they say. But my dad believes and teaches a number of things that other conservative Christian men don't, and it's caused lots of difficulty for me in the communities.
 
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
20,539
17,698
USA
✟953,431.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
It interested me that, on a conservative Christian subreddit, I received mostly negative replies.

Reddit isn't very nice. They attract an interesting lot. It isn't you. :)

The point is that I've had difficulty in conservative Christian circles because of my father's teachings, many of which aren't accepted in the conservative Christian churches (though my father considers himself conservative). Knowing that the Bible expects daughters to obey fathers, and men in authority in general, this naturally creates some confusion: what to obey? Who to obey?

I attended an Evangelical church in the past. When we studied 1 Peter and reached chapter 3 the room was silent. It was like the Sprint commercial. You could hear a pin drop. No one said a word and the room was filled with deaconesses! In my experience, this topic isn't welcomed by most in Christian circles.

The women I knew who valued submission and aspired to live surrendered lives weren't believers. They were conscientious, feminine, and desirous to serve their husbands. I expected to find the same when I returned to church. But it never happened. There are a few who agree; but as a rule it isn't the norm.

There are a number of movements these days in conservative Christian circles, such as the Stay At Home Daughters movement, council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood etc. that steer women away from feminism, independent thinking, and back to submissiveness. With this in mind, what's wrong with me obeying my father even if you think he's incorrect? Which Biblical principle should thus be taught more clearly or emphasized to the greater degree: obey male authorities, or obey some greater abstract truth?

I believe the concept is easier to embrace when your experiences were good and the examples were healthy and God-honoring. I don't know if I'd feel the same in different circumstances. We were sheltered and weren't exposed to feminist teachings. But my parents didn't expect us to remain home or forgo the marketplace. They prepared us for work. The option of doing otherwise was on the table.

A number of people have told me, obey the Bible, not your father. Your father teaches incorrect things. But he was my male authority, and to go against him would in and of itself be going against the Bible.

I don't have an opinion either way. Convictions are the Lord's domain. If you're in error, I trust the Holy Spirit will guide you aright. My argument has little chance of standing against the familiarity of one you've known your entire life. You know him intimately in a manner you'll never know me. Unless there's a word from God, my comment will fall on deaf ears. Understandably so.

The way I deal with situations like yours is simple. I ask the question, "Is that a word from the Lord or your personal opinion?" That settles the matter. In most instances it came from them. Their beliefs, interpretation of scripture, and so on. He didn't tell them to talk to me. I know it and they do to. Problem solved.

I don't believe in defending myself and I may not explain. I went through something similar when I wore a head covering and with my calling. They were wrong on both accounts. I don't feel I have to justify my beliefs or behavior if I'm not sinning. Just because someone disagrees doesn't make it wrong.

But I'm a non conformist. That helps. I ignore a lot. ;)

Yours in His Service,

~Bella
 
Upvote 0

NerdGirl

The untamed daughter
Apr 14, 2020
2,651
3,104
USA
✟65,654.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Thanks! What age do you think that is? The Stay At Home Daughters movement, which one of my old online Calvinist friends was a big believer in, taught that women must obey fathers so long as they are unmarried and under his roof. That means if a thirtysomething isn't married yet, and is still in the father's home, his word is to be followed.

As with many other conservative Christians, these groups will also talk about truth a lot, though. And that begs the question that you answered: God's Word, or family man's authority? Few men think beyond the principle to apply it to the numerous practical situations I included in my OP. There seems to be an assumption that all conservative Bible believing men agree on every last thing in life and will thus lead daughters and wives into perfect womanhood if they just submit to everything they say. But my dad believes and teaches a number of things that other conservative Christian men don't, and it's caused lots of difficulty for me in the communities.

I don't think there should be a hard-and-fast rule about a particular age at which children "should" become independent. There are so many variables that go into upbringing and the transition from dependence. It typically happens over a span of years, I think. Some young women may find their own outlook and decision making skills when they're still teenagers living at home, while others may struggle to come out from beneath parental teachings well into adulthood. And some women have trouble thinking for themselves and not being "led", while others find that path easily and follow it without any difficulty.

I can't directly relate to your situation, as I didn't enjoy a healthy relationship with my dad. He did not earn my respect in most ways. However, I was a very compliant and obedient child towards my mother and my teachers because they earned my trust and respect, at least when I was young! I developed great respect for some of my male teachers, as well as my male pastors, when I was a teenager and young adult, and felt quite secure in trusting their authority and direction.

I suppose it boiled down to this for me: Trust, respect, and therefore obedience, must be earned.

God's already earned it from me. I'm not giving it a to man simply because he's male.
 
Upvote 0

kdm1984

WELS
Oct 8, 2016
309
366
SW MO, USA
✟38,896.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thanks again, ladies.

Growing up, I thought my parents had it all together. We weren't taught the usual "women do this in the home" type stuff in the 1990s because we believed Jesus was coming back in 2008 (Israel's 1948 nationhood + 60 years generation = Jesus Rapture 2008!). The End Times were what they focused on after they left the WELS Lutheran church, and only much later in my adulthood did I realize they focused excessively on it, much like I only learned much later that my online Calvinist Patriarchal friends in the early 2010s focused excessively on women's obedience and gender roles (Vision Forum, ATI, Stay At Home Daughters movement, etc). That was my environment; how was I to turn out any differently?

Men (especially Reformed and Lutheran) sometimes complain about the weight that women and Pentecostal types give to personal experience. As though God is only a nebulous Gnostic abstraction who doesn't affect our daily lives, as though all conceptual Biblical doctrines are agreed upon by everyone (male leaders included), and supposedly clear as day to understand apply. Then I come along and mention what my family taught, or what these Calvinists taught...and people say, "but your personal experiences and family aren't truth!" But this is what I was taught, this is what my male authorities taught, this is what they said was truth. And we're taught to obey our male and parental authorities! So why do they expect me to have turned out differently? Was I supposed to have dismissed these, disobeyed them, and ignored such 'personal experiences'? If so, then that puts the emphasis on woman's independence, and that doesn't fit the submission model. Their whole primary argument falters, and they don't see it. If we submit, we're damned, because we're submitting to an authority that lacks truth. If we don't submit, we're still damned, because we're being disobedient independent 'feminists,' even though we're pursuing truth. Damned if we do, damned if we don't.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

NerdGirl

The untamed daughter
Apr 14, 2020
2,651
3,104
USA
✟65,654.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Thanks again, ladies.

Growing up, I thought my parents had it all together. We weren't taught the usual "women do this in the home" type stuff in the 1990s because we believed Jesus was coming back in 2008 (Israel's 1948 nationhood + 60 years generation = Jesus Rapture 2008!). The End Times were what they focused on after they left the WELS Lutheran church, and only much later in my adulthood did I realize they focused excessively on it, much like I only learned much later that my online Calvinist Patriarchal friends in the early 2010s focused excessively on women's obedience and gender roles (Vision Forum, ATI, Stay At Home Daughters movement, etc). That was my environment; how was I to turn out any differently?

Men (especially Reformed and Lutheran) sometimes complain about the weight that women and Pentecostal types give to personal experience. As though God is only a nebulous Gnostic abstraction who doesn't affect our daily lives, as though all conceptual Biblical doctrines are agreed upon by everyone (male leaders included), and supposedly clear as day to understand apply. Then I come along and mention what my family taught, or what these Calvinists taught...and people say, "but your personal experiences and family aren't truth!" But this is what I was taught, this is what my male authorities taught, this is what they said was truth. And we're taught to obey our male and parental authorities! So why do they expect me to have turned out differently? Was I supposed to have dismissed these, disobeyed them, and ignored such 'personal experiences'? If so, then that puts the emphasis on woman's independence, and that doesn't fit the submission model. Their whole primary argument falters, and they don't see it. If we submit, we're damned, because we're submitting to an authority that lacks truth. If we don't submit, we're still damned, because we're being disobedient independent 'feminists,' even though we're pursuing truth. Damned if we do, damned if we don't.

I was never told that women should be in the home, or what I should do with my future. And my mother was incredibly conservative. She chose to be a homemaker all her life. But she wasn't happy. She was an immensely intelligent, creative woman, and I watched her many talents go unused and unappreciated under the banner of "dutiful wife and mother". I'm so thankful that she never tried to impress that sort of thinking on me.

My father valued education. He held multiple college degrees. He never made me feel like I should follow any path besides my passion, either.

It's difficult to find connections with other Christian women who don't subscribe to the "homemaker" philosophy.

I can feel your frustration through your post!

Good thing we have LIBERTY in Christ. And GRACE. All of these stories you describe are prime examples of what turn the world off from "religion", including Christianity. So few people truly focus on God Himself. They're obsessed with doctrine, theology, dogma, and above all else, "being right". They run like hamsters in wheels, round and round and round, without ever bothering to stop and look at the culture they're perpetuating. A culture of miserable Christians and unreached lost souls who don't want anything to do with their unhappy, legalistic viewpoints.
 
Upvote 0