Climate change, deforestation, mass extinction...

[dlamberth]

Take a look at the documentary The War on Humans that ‘documents the decline of the environmental movement toward a Utopian and explicit anti-human ideology’.

So, I watched the complete video and all I can say is that is so wrong on so many levels. There is no war on Humans by the environmental movement. If anything there IS a war on exploitative anthropocentrism with the goal of replacing that with participative biocentrism. And what's at stake? The human race! I'd think that's something to get VERY radical about. As with any home, what we do to the planet, we are doing to ourselves.

Tell me how this quote from Thomas Berry in The_Dream_of_the_Earth is anything close to a war on Humans: "Any progress of the human at the expense of the larger life community must ultimately lead to a diminishment of human life itself. A degraded habitat will produce degraded humans. An enhanced habitat supports an elevated mode of human. This is evident not only in economic order, but also throughout the entire range of human affairs."

 

[alexiscurious]

Is there even any way to combat this? How do you even convince billions of people to stop using so much electricity and gas?

 

[awitch]

Is there even any way to combat this? How do you even convince billions of people to stop using so much electricity and gas?

They might not have to if we could switch to renewable sources of power. Seems pretty common sense to do so but the big obstacle appears to be the oil industry and it's hundreds of billions (with a b) dollars in profit. Their political lobbies are highly influential and they don't like the idea of looking at alternatives.

 

[dlamberth]

How do you even convince billions of people to stop using so much electricity and gas?

And how do you convince all of those people that consumerism isn't the answer to happiness.

 

[Troy Rambo]

Environmental issues may not be exactly a question of religion or faith - yet bizarrely enough, there are people out there who treat them as if they were. Bafflingly enough, conservative think tanks who feel that any change to the status quo would endanger their future profits have managed to convince a considerable portion of the population that it's all a big controversy, that the verdict is not yet in, and that those who'd call for an immediate response to these threats are loopy fanatics who don't know what's what.

And all the while, the rainforests keep on dwindling, the oceans are not only plagued by growing garbage patches but also subject to acidification, which may cause the entire marine ecosystem to collapse from the bottom up, species everywhere are disappearing at a rate that you'd otherwise associate with major natural catastrophes, our own species grows at an alarming rate, and we are using up natural resources at a pace that would require several planets at the same time to sustain.

The thing is: none of this is a controversy. The verdict of the scientific community (i.e. people who deal with these matters professionally and have all the data at hand) is virtually unanimous. To deny it and pretend that it's still nothing more than some wishy-washy hypothesis is the rough equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and going "LALALA!!! I CANNOT HEAR YOU!!"

So... how does your religion relate to the devastating effect our post-industrial species has on the planet, and what does it have to say about combating the mess we've created?

It is true that God wants us to take care of our world:


“God blessed them and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and increase in number, fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.’” Genesis 1:28.


But you people are spending a lot of time and energy in worry:


“Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:6-7).


Furthermore, God has established all authority on earth. So let them worry about it:


“Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.” Romans 13:1.


Now I suppose you can cast your vote reflecting your beliefs when that time comes. But all this concern about the world by watching and feeding on the news is pointless and harmful. You set yourself up for fear, hatred, and anxiety by consuming this kind of garbage. The only thing you need to worry about are making godly decisions in your everyday life. Stop trying to control the world. That’s the Lord’s job.

 

[dlamberth]

Stop trying to control the world. That’s the Lord’s job.

This exactly why the concern. In our raping and desecrating the earth in our attempt to control it and make it into our image we fail in letting the Lord do His job of creating a vibrant and healthy earth.

 

[awitch]

But you people are spending a lot of time and energy in worry:

“Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:6-7).

As the obscure Maury Laws song goes:

"You wish and I'll whittle
You drip while I dry
Let's all try to help a little 'cause
Even a miracle needs a hand"

Now I suppose you can cast your vote reflecting your beliefs when that time comes. But all this concern about the world by watching and feeding on the news is pointless and harmful. You set yourself up for fear, hatred, and anxiety by consuming this kind of garbage. The only thing you need to worry about are making godly decisions in your everyday life. Stop trying to control the world. That’s the Lord’s job.

I know ignorance is bliss, but willful ignorance is foolishness.

 

[Gxg (G²)]

So, I watched the complete video and all I can say is that is so wrong on so many levels. There is no war on Humans by the environmental movement. If anything there IS a war on exploitative anthropocentrism with the goal of replacing that with participative biocentrism. And what's at stake? The human race! I'd think that's something to get VERY radical about. As with any home, what we do to the planet, we are doing to ourselves.

I understand the sentiments, but it does not change the fact where there has been extensive ecological damage done to both humans AND animals when it comes to not seeing how to actually seeing how much is done in the name of environmentalism that both perverts true stewardship of the ennvironment - and obscures how much of a class battle it is.

Several have already spoken on this issue before when it comes to what's known as Environmental Apartheid - where you clean up in one place but you end up destroying others and only having things "clean" for those with power. Van Jones noted it best in the following:

Eco-Imperialism is a REAL issue and there's no way to avoid the way this has actually played out...as it concerns Western governments, the United Nations, environmentalist groups and various non-governmental organizations that are usurping economic and industrial progress in the Third World and keeping millions in the grip of misery and death all in the name of ecology protection and "sustainable development."

And before going further, no - plenty of people are for environmental stewardship of the environment while also recognizing how much of an issue it is politically when it comes to de-empowering other groups (especially Indigenous peoples in communities or areas) from actually having a say or a voice for how the process plays out. That is - and will ALWAYS be - an issue, especially when people saying how the environment should be handled get ignored if they feel you don't need extensive government intervention to do so. I've spoken about this before previously, as seen here:

 

[Robban]

It is true that God wants us to take care of our world:


“God blessed them and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and increase in number, fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.’” Genesis 1:28.


But you people are spending a lot of time and energy in worry:


“Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:6-7).


Furthermore, God has established all authority on earth. So let them worry about it:


“Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.” Romans 13:1.


Now I suppose you can cast your vote reflecting your beliefs when that time comes. But all this concern about the world by watching and feeding on the news is pointless and harmful. You set yourself up for fear, hatred, and anxiety by consuming this kind of garbage. The only thing you need to worry about are making godly decisions in your everyday life. Stop trying to control the world. That’s the Lord’s job.

That is one way to see Life, or the days we are alloted.

But I think there is a greater purpose.

In and with laser technology, one tool Company had in thier adverts.
"Make your mark without making a mark."

But I would think the purpose is to make a mark, not a mark that dissapears when the laser is switched off.
To be remembered for something good, not bad.
It is our job and responsibility to not only take care but also to elevate this djungel into a dwelling place fit for the king when He comes.

Somewhere it says, "Well done......."
Don,t know where, just something that flew into my head.

 

[Gxg (G²)]

If anything there IS a war on exploitative anthropocentrism with the goal of replacing that with participative biocentrism. And what's at stake? The human race! I'd think that's something to get VERY radical about. As with any home, what we do to the planet, we are doing to ourselves.

Before going further, no - plenty of people are for environmental stewardship of the environment while also recognizing how much of an issue it is politically when it comes to de-empowering other groups (especially Indigenous peoples in communities or areas) from actually having a say or a voice for how the process plays out. That is - and will ALWAYS be - an issue, especially when people saying how the environment should be handled get ignored if they feel you don't need extensive government intervention to do so. I've spoken about this before previously, as seen here:

It's interesting to witness the ways that others have offered solutions on the issue of how to use resources. I am reminded of those who advocate Anarcho-Primitivism. Some have advocated that adopting an anarchist perspective is the best means of preventing civilization from falling apart ...and going back to the model used by Indigenous people/First Nations groups, even though those groups have often been very bothered by the ways others may label them as anarchist if their version of anarchy operates from a colonial mindset (more in Anti-Colonial Anarchism vs Decolonization | Unsettling America as well as Anarchism and Indigenous Resistance in Bolivia: Interview with Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui and Original Affluence, nomadic lifestyle lessons for capitalists ).

For more, one may wish to investigate Locating An Indigenous Anarchism (Aragorn!) | The Anarchist Library and Anarcho-primitivism, Green Anarchism and Civilization – Jesus Radicals .....as well as these excellent presentations.

Noam Chomsky "Anarchism and Indigenous Societies" - YouTube

rebellion, possibilities of a decentralizing model and inclusions of other perspectives in anarchism - YouTube

John Zerzan - Anarcho-Primitivism and Transhumanism (2nd discussion) - YouTube

David Graeber - Delivers a talk on 'indigenous' peoples. - YouTube

The advancement of society has literally skyrocketed - yet concern for how we advance has not....and thus, there's A LOT of imbalance because of where we have not found a way to live in symbiosis with the world we live in. It doesn't mean we automatically have to move out of our buildings or stop using modern inventions of science - as I support others in the scientific and technological world who've developed ways with eco-friendly environments being more realistic. Moreover, we've forgotten what Indigenous Peoples/First Nation's groups understood when it came to respecting the world we live in and choosing to intentionally live on less. Other Native American followers of Jesus have done a really amazing job on addressing that - one conference I am reminded of entitled "An American Theology of the Land" where several (i.e. Richard Twiss, Randy Woodley of the book Shalom and the Community of Creation: An Indigenous Vision , etc.) Native Americans shared on the ways that addressing the world from a theistic perspective required seeing how we are a part of it and not meant to be above it.

 

[Gxg (G²)]

As with any home, what we do to the planet, we are doing to ourselves.

How one treats the world is just as important as any claim that we should take care of the planet - and this is something that has been brought up before when it comes to addressing how much is done in the name of environmentalism that has little to do with the environment and everything to do with the profit coming from it. One's eschatology will make a difference on that - and as said before, I have already shared on that issue before ...as seen here:

It truly is fascinating that some of the people who seem the least concerned for all of the fears arising on the planet and its mistreatment (Even though they have said it is a problem) would be the Buddhist Monks in the monasteries throughout Asia.








I really appreciate the Buddhist Monks and their mindsets - with them being very similar to the Desert Fathers in how introspective they are and disciplined, as well as aware of there being more to this life than this physical reality - something which has led to a lot of dialogues between Buddhists and Christians on differing levels.

...with the Buddhists monks, it intrigues me to see how they seem to have accepted a finality on the entire issue with feeling that there are greater concerns that are to be held to - and Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh noted that "only love can save us from climate change." In his view, most people are not responding to the threat of global warming, despite overwhelming scientific evidence, because they are unable to save themselves from their own personal suffering - thus making themselves too burdened to worry about the battles impacting the Earth/Nature. Although he has outlined practical ways to address global warming before in his books (such as The World We Have: A Buddhist Approach to Peace and Ecology: Easyread Large and The Blooming of a Lotus: Revised Edition of the Classic Guided Meditation ), he has still been of the mindset that nothing is permanent and there needs to be a willingness to not hold so tightly to things. It amazes me that the man is one at great peace even as he predicts the possible collapse of civilisation within 100 years as a result of runaway climate change. - more in ECOBUDDHISM :: Only love can save us from climate change and ECOBUDDHISM :: BOOK - Contents, Overview, Excerpts





Through meditation and education and acts of love one person at a time, change is a gradual process. We see that today, in countries such as Thailand and Japan, many Buddhist monks are active in Green groups.. And we can see in places like Bhutan where there is immense security due to how others handle themselves - more noted in Water and Climate in the Himalayas and Buddhism and climate change | Sujato’s Blog

BBC: Extreme Pilgrim - Shaolin Monastery - YouTube​

​

​

​

There have been cases of others standing in the way of aggressive destruction of the environment (like these Buddhist monks in Cambodia blessing trees which are about to be destroyed to make way for a banana plantation - with the orange cloth making them sacred and used in the hopes of deterring loggers from cutting them down.

​

[/IMG]​

But if things do not change, there's no sense in fear being promoted within that system.

​

I am reminded of where Pulitzer Prize-winning poet Gary Snyder wrote an essay called “Buddhism and the Coming Revolution"....detailing at one point the practice of Buddhist Anarchism (more in​

Buddhist Anarchism (Gary Snyder)​

and​

BUDDHISM AND THE COMING REVOLUTION by Gary Snyder | Arthur Magazine​

).​

Buddhist Anarchism​

is very similar in many ways with​

Anarcho Primitivism​

. And interestingly enough, Buddhist Anarchism praises Chaos as a harbinger of change...yet unlike more mainstream anarchists - they don't seem to bother creating their own institutions since Chaos will itself bring change. To others, from Chaos a better world would naturally emerge​

For reference, one can go​

here​

or here in​

Paul Cudenec: The skilful means of anarcho-Buddhism​

and to​

Zen Anarchy (Max Cafard) | The Anarchist Library​

.​

And for others:​

Shifu, Soul of Chinese Anarchism - Edward S. Krebs - Google Books​

​

The Implicit & Experiential Rantings of a Person: Envisioning a Buddhist Anarchism​

​

The Implicit & Experiential Rantings of a Person: Reflections on a Buddhist Anarchism​

​

Socially Engaged Buddhism - Sallie B. King - Google Books​

God is all about sustainable development and responsible care of our world - be it with solar energy OR with oil and being careful how it is utilized....as well as always seeking to find more efficient ways to take care of our world. And God is HIGHLY concerned with Eco-Imperialism where other impoverished nations are not allowed to choose their own destiny and things imposed on them in the name of "sustainable development" are often keeping them starving while those doing the imposing actions are living quite well. There's an excellent book on the issue I have been thankful for, entitled "Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death"





Industrialized country proposals to integrate environmental protection into the WTO trade regime constitute environmental imperialism - the imposition of industrialized country values and preferences on less powerful nations....for although conservation is a wonderful and important thing, it should be noted that environmental protection is a luxury that poor countries can ill afford - and even though wealthy countries have played a leadership role in the protection of the global environment, it is hypocritical when wealthy nations throw away their own waste into poorer nations (i.e. electronic waste, oil spills, etc.) and then tell those nations they have to be careful. The same applies for issues of waste within our own nation when it comes to impoverished areas being dumped upon in order to make other places look


clean and nice for the wealthy








As it concerns religion, believers (at least people claiming faith in God) should always take seriously the issue of environmental stewardship. And I'm glad for others who do so - Sustainable Traditions: Home (here). Moreover, I'm very thankful for believers taking seriously the issue of what it means to "Go Green" and see it from the perspective of others who are actually making a difference with it.





One of the most inspiring examples for me will always be George Washington Carver (more shared here in #1, #20 and #45 ) - an AMAZING believer who did much to literally revolutionize the world via agriculture..with very little materials to work with many times and a system that was designed to be against him/other blacks....in regards to Jim Crow and Slavery. He did what he could with what the Lord gave him to promote the Kingdom of God - and show the miraculous...and others were amazed just as they are today with what he did despite the system. For a good read on the issue, one can go to The Green Vision of Henry Ford and George Washington Carver: Two ... - Page 203





For those communities impacted the most by things that others don't deal with, going "Green" is a big deal. People like Majora Carter have done stellar work in the Bronx, which has a reputation as one of New York’s most dangerous boroughs and one of the most polluted. Grassroots organizations like Sustainable South Bronx (SSBx) addressed both of those pressing needs with a single solution — providing training and jobs that benefit the environment....as described by Majora Carter, founder of SSBx, in her "Green the Ghetto" talk. I'm thankful for the ways that the organization’s B.E.S.T. (Bronx Environmental Stewardship Training) Program provides residents with training for careers in ecological restoration, landscaping, green roof installation, hazardous waste cleanup and home weatherizing. All of those things are VERY RELEVANT when considering the ways that it impacts people in the hood.





It's already sad enough that we have TOXIC Racism (i.e. placing waste in economically impoverished communities..especially minority ones and poor/rural white communities ) due to institutional discrimination...or choosing to push out communities in the event that the government finds a use for the land they live in/have chosen to adapt to. Seeking to have sustainable development/green energy is about survival rather than doing so as if it's one option amongst many. There's a significant need to address the deep/historical issues behind what keeps others from being able to grow/live healthy....including institutional systems in our government that have often fought against others seeking to grow healthy resources. The same thing goes for issues of the environment being damaged by many things which we use often (i.e. gasoline, fumes/pollution, toxic waste, run-off, etc.)

​

 

[Gxg (G²)]

"Radical" environmentalism is needed when the climate is radically changing... Cut back on fossil fuels.. Go solar ...

Not all things done in the name of "radical" are actually different from the same things we've normalized and that have caused destruction. How one goes about the process makes a world of difference as well. Native Americans have long been speaking out on the issues for some time (more here, here, here, ).

I have always been amazed at the many finding ways to take things as crucial as trees and make them a priority when it comes to the buildings we have.

What follows are 11+ Clever Buildings Whose Architects Refused To Cut Down Local Trees in light of how Deforestation has a significant environmental impact. Many studies suggest that is a contributor to global warming; it impacts the water cycle by reducing the amount of...
BOREDPANDA.COM

And for others:

Giant Japanese Treehouse | Treehouse



Treehouse Living: 4 Custom, Eco-friendly Options

-Amazing treehouse designs: They’re not just for kids (http://www.angieslist.com/.../amazing-treehouse-designs... )

Amazing treehouse designs: They’re not just for kids
ANGIESLIST.COM


"Tree Houses – Tiny House Talk" ( http://thetinylife.com/tag/tree-house/ andhttp://tinyhousetalk.com/category/tree-houses/ )

Tree House « The Tiny Life
Tiny houses and tree houses go together like shrimp over grits or gravy over biscuits.(Cravin’ some southern food,...
THETINYLIFE.COM

​

 

[DennisTate]

Environmental issues may not be exactly a question of religion or faith - yet bizarrely enough, there are people out there who treat them as if they were. Bafflingly enough, conservative think tanks who feel that any change to the status quo would endanger their future profits have managed to convince a considerable portion of the population that it's all a big controversy, that the verdict is not yet in, and that those who'd call for an immediate response to these threats are loopy fanatics who don't know what's what.

And all the while, the rainforests keep on dwindling, the oceans are not only plagued by growing garbage patches but also subject to acidification, which may cause the entire marine ecosystem to collapse from the bottom up, species everywhere are disappearing at a rate that you'd otherwise associate with major natural catastrophes, our own species grows at an alarming rate, and we are using up natural resources at a pace that would require several planets at the same time to sustain.

The thing is: none of this is a controversy. The verdict of the scientific community (i.e. people who deal with these matters professionally and have all the data at hand) is virtually unanimous. To deny it and pretend that it's still nothing more than some wishy-washy hypothesis is the rough equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and going "LALALA!!! I CANNOT HEAR YOU!!"

So... how does your religion relate to the devastating effect our post-industrial species has on the planet, and what does it have to say about combating the mess we've created?

I am of the belief that it will be far easier to sell conservatives on a plan to turn deserts green as an opening gambit toward stabilization of the climate than it will be to convince them of the value of a carbon tax of some type.

...http://saharaforestproject.com/projects/jordan.html

Most of us conservatives are terribly unaware of why we have not yet experienced a significant rise in ocean levels in spite of all the melting that has taken place on the land based Greenland Ice Pack as well as the world's glaciers.

It is because of the huge amount of ice being added to the central region of Antarctica.

A New Mexico biology teacher and coach has an explanation that conservatives will be able to understand because it fits with Isaiah chapter 35.

..........Carl Cantrell.

"So how is our problem of continental drying causing global warming? It all has to do with vegetation and sunlight. When sun light hits a plant, it causes a process which we call photosynthesis where the energy from the sun light creates oxygen for us to breathe, water for us to drink, and is stored as sugar for plants and animals to use. When the same sun light hits the soil, all of its energy turns into heat and is radiated back into the atmosphere.. ."

"Therefore, the less vegetation you have on the planet, the more sunlight is being turned into heat and the warmer the planet becomes...."

"Just take a look at any satellite picture of the earth showing heat and you will see that our deserts are the warmest spots on the planet by far. More heat is being generated by just one of the top four or five deserts than by all of our cities combined.... "

"The truth is that you can do more to decrease global warming by just reducing the average temperature for the SaharaDesert by one or two degrees than if we humans completely quit using fossil fuels and returned to the cave…."

"So, how would you start working to resolve this problem? Easy, cool the deserts and get some vegetation growing on them as soon as possible. But the method is much more complex than that. You have to use the prevailing trade winds in relation to the deserts to get the best results as quickly as possible and it will be extremely expensive…."

"Then we build desalination plants along the coast near these water sheds and pipe water to the tops or ridges of the water sheds…"

"We need to start working on this as soon as possible because, if the planet reaches a point to where it is warming faster than our technology can possibly stop or reverse this warming trend, then our planet is lost and all life will cease to exist on this planet within a relatively short period of time. We will need to start with the largest and hottest deserts because cooling them will have the greatest benefit in the least time (Global Warming II by biologist Carl Cantrell)."

 

[dlamberth]

Robert Redford, Actor and longtime conservationist at the High-level event of the United Nations General Assembly on Climate Change (29 June 2015).

 

[Jane_the_Bane]

Regarding increasing ice in Antarctica:

Overall, it is true that sea ice in the Antarctic is increasing.

Around the peninsula, where there is a lot of warming [PDF], the ice is retreating. This is the area of the recent and dramatic Larsen B and Ross ice shelf breakups.

But the rest of the continent has not shown any clear warming or cooling and sea ice has increased over the last decade or so.

This is not actually a big surprise.

In fact, it is completely in line with model expectations that CO2-dominated forcing will have a disproportionately large effect in the north. The reasons lie in the much larger amount of land in the northern hemisphere and the fact that the ocean’s thermal inertia and ability to mix delay any temperature signal from the ongoing absorption of heat. The local geography also plays a dominating role. The circumpolar current acts as a buffer preventing warm water from the tropics from transporting heat to the South Pole, a buffer that does not exist in the north. You can read some more details about that here.

Does it “balance out” in the end? Not really. Sea ice in the Arctic is reaching dramatic record lows. There are other components of the cryosphere that we can look at as well, permafrost, the Greenland ice sheet, global glacier mass, and these all carry the Global Warming signal.

One must look at the balance of evidence, not just those bits one likes. And this balance is clearly in agreement with all other indicators that warming is real and rapid.

 

[Jane_the_Bane]

Evironmental politics are at their worst when they rely on poor people continuing to live miserably.

The first world is like a glutton who realizes that if everybody else treats the larder the same way they do, food will be depleted before they can burp - and then go on to tell the peasants that they ought to tighten their belts a few notches, while the fat guys continue to overeat.

People cite the high costs of combating pollution as a reason for abstaining from doing anything - but the long-term effects of pollution will cost us infinitely more, even if we only look at the factor of money.
Long after it became clear what a disastrous course we're maintaining, car companies invested billions in marketing to convince urban dwellers that what they needed most in their life was freaking SUVs, guzzling even more gas than ever before. So now overweight moms cruise down to the mall in hulking offroaders, wasting more non-regenerative resources than ever before.

 

[DennisTate]

Regarding increasing ice in Antarctica:

My apologies if this statistic is not up to date......

http://www.habtheory.com/1/101.php

"At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie!"

'Let us consider Antarctica for a moment.
We have already seen that it is big. It has a land area of 5.5
million square miles, and is presently covered by something in excess
of seven million cubic miles of ice weighing an estimated 19
quadrillion tons (19 followed by 15 zeros). What worries the
theorists of earth-crust displacement is that this vast ice-cap is
remorselessly increasing in size and weight:'at the rate of 293 cubic
miles of ice each year--almost as much as if Lake Ontario were frozen
solidly annually and added to it.(Graham Hancock, Fingerprints of
the Gods, page 480).

 

[dlamberth]

July was the warmest month ever recorded for the globe.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/summary-info

 

[DennisTate]

My belief is that the threat of rising ocean levels is far far far far more serious a problem than we are being told and one of the only responses is to invest heavily in projects like the Sahara Forest Project or the Sahara Solar Breeder Project.

There are two exceptionally good images at this link that show that because the W. A. I. S. is below sea level it could crack and slide and collapse rapidly.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090205142132.htm

Collapse Of Antarctic Ice Sheet Would Likely Put Washington, D.C. Largely Underwater

University of Toronto and Oregon State University geophysicists have shown that should the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapse and melt in a warming world – as many scientists are concerned it will – it is the coastlines of North America and of nations in the southern Indian Ocean that will face the greatest threats from rising sea levels.

 

[DennisTate]

Not all things done in the name of "radical" are actually different from the same things we've normalized and that have caused destruction. How one goes about the process makes a world of difference as well. Native Americans have long been speaking out on the issues for some time (more here, here, here, ).

....

I have always been amazed at the many finding ways to take things as crucial as trees and make them a priority when it comes to the buildings we have.

......​

​

I agree........... The Prophecy of the coming of the Rainbow Warriors could fit perfectly with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit predicted in the Christian and Jewish scriptures.


http://www.christianforums.com/threads/prophecy-of-the-rainbow-warriors-by-eyes-of-fire.7717503/

Prophecy of the Rainbow Warriors by Eyes of Fire!



Which seems to fit well with what was shown to near death experiencer Howard Storm about the world economy two or three centuries in the future.

The image of the future that they gave me then, and it was their image, not one that I created, surprised me. My image had previously been sort of like Star Wars, where everything was space age, plastics, and technology.



The future that they showed me was almost no technology at all. What everybody, absolutely everybody, in this euphoric future spent most of their time doing was raising children. The chief concern of people was children, and everybody considered children to be the most precious commodity in the world.



And when a person became an adult, there was no sense of anxiety, nor hatred, nor competition.



There was this enormous sense of trust and mutual respect. If a person, in this view of the future, became disturbed, then the community of people all cared about the disturbed person falling away from the harmony of the group. Spiritually, through prayer and love, the others would elevate the afflicted person.



What people did with the rest of their time was that they gardened, with almost no physical effort. They showed me that plants, with prayer, would produce huge fruits and vegetables.



People, in unison, could control the climate of the planet through prayer. Everybody would work with mutual trust and the people would call the rain, when needed, and the sun to shine.



Animals lived with people, in harmony.



People, in this best of all worlds, weren't interested in knowledge; they were interested in wisdom. This was because they were in a position where anything they needed to know, in the knowledge category, they could receive simply through prayer. Everything, to them, was solvable. They could do anything they wanted to do.

(Howard Storm, near-death.com)