• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Clarification of 3rd Christian Principle of Foru.ms: Satanism/ Satanic symbols

Status
Not open for further replies.

Moriah_Conquering_Wind

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2006
23,327
2,234
✟34,174.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Sweetie, truly, did you not think people may take exception to what you said? Realistically.
Does that matter? I take exception to many things people say on here, but my doing so is never used by any of them as a basis for guiding their experience, thoughts, feelings, or resulting self-expression.

Nor do I expect it to be -- nor should it be.

We have clear rules to deal with when people are not being civil -- and that is enough. We do not have rules to enforce conformity -- nor do I desire to see such rules made even if they were made in a way that served my predilections.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pgp_protector
Upvote 0

GreenMunchkin

Likes things. And stuff. But mostly things.
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2007
20,385
7,476
46
United Kingdom of wo0t
✟122,441.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Does that matter? I take exception to many things people say on here, but my doing so is never used by any of them as a basis for guiding their experience, thoughts, feelings, or resulting self-expression.

Nor do I expect it to be -- nor should it be.

We have clear rules to deal with when people are not being civil -- and that is enough. We do not have rules to enforce conformity -- nor do I desire to see such rules made even if they were made in a way that served my predilections.
This is a circular discussion :)

All I can tell you is Time's post wasn't lacking in civility, at all. I suppose, ultimately, we are all responsible for our own decorum.

Stuff to do :hug: Hope you're well, duck. God bless. x
 
Upvote 0

Moriah_Conquering_Wind

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2006
23,327
2,234
✟34,174.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Making false and inflammatory accusations against another is by definition and in its intrinsic nature, uncivil, even if it is done in the softest tone possible.
Finger pointing, slander, and mischaracterisation are never civil.
Be well GM. :hug:
 
  • Like
Reactions: icedtea
Upvote 0

Time2BCounted

Holding Christian Standard High At ForU.ms
Aug 5, 2007
4,085
350
✟5,834.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Making false and inflammatory accusations against another is by definition and in its intrinsic nature, uncivil, even if it is done in the softest tone possible.
Finger pointing, slander, and mischaracterisation are never civil.
Be well GM. :hug:
Who made a false statement? To say a sonet to satan is beautiful is indeed promotional imho. For you to be allowed to promote such thought certainly would not have been allowed prior to 7/7.

I would love to see an explanation as to why it is allowed now.
 
Upvote 0

Jebediah

Senior Veteran
Dec 8, 2005
2,639
220
48
✟3,940.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Well, its an opinion. We are still allowed to have opinions. I would think that a good thing.
Promoting is a loaded word used to use against whatever someones opinion is one doesn't seem to like, in My Opinion.

I think perhaps the definition of promotion needs to be clarified.

Just an opinion.

I have been accused multiple times since the decision came down. Seems that once the "promotion" word was codified, it became the buzzword of the moment.
 
Upvote 0

Moriah_Conquering_Wind

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2006
23,327
2,234
✟34,174.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Who made a false statement? To say a sonet to satan is beautiful is indeed promotional imho. For you to be allowed to promote such thought certainly would not have been allowed prior to 7/7.

I would love to see an explanation as to why it is allowed now.
"Promotion" is not permitted as far as I'm aware. However, "promotion" involves such concepts as recruiting, proselytizing, advocating, etc. Not merely reporting an opinion. An opinion is a fluid thing, like art. I think you and I are just too different from one another for you to truly grasp me, is what it comes down to. Trust me -- if I wanted to "promote" anything, I am well and truly capable of doing so -- effectively and convincingly. Sharing an opinion doesn't qualify here. I am pleased, however, to see you qualify your statement with "IMHO". IMHO, that is precisely what is needed. You OPINE that it constitutes promoting. And I'm telling you factually, it doesn't.
 
Upvote 0

Moriah_Conquering_Wind

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2006
23,327
2,234
✟34,174.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Well, its an opinion. We are still allowed to have opinions. I would think that a good thing.
Promoting is a loaded word used to use against whatever someones opinion is one doesn't seem to like, in My Opinion.
I completely share, and second, both your opinions there, HD. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

drstevej

"The crowd always chooses Barabbas."
In Memory Of
Mar 18, 2003
47,577
27,116
76
Lousianna
✟1,016,631.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Jebediah

Senior Veteran
Dec 8, 2005
2,639
220
48
✟3,940.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You were told to stop running those Got Satan? commercials, eh?

*hurt*

I thought the:

"Join the Darkside! We have cookies!"

thing was funny. I used it for my flier for a class I am teaching on LHP at my shop this fall. The picture is a melding of Pinhead and Uncle Sam in the classic "I want you!" pose.

Oh well...sometimes my sense of humor can be off...
 
Upvote 0

Moriah_Conquering_Wind

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2006
23,327
2,234
✟34,174.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Seems that once the "promotion" word was codified, it became the buzzword of the moment.
And that's my point, really. I find Erwin's ruling eminently reasonable for a CHRISTIAN site -- "don't promote Satanism". Makes sense from a Christian standpoint, fits in with the mission and goals of his site. Erwin did NOT rule, "never speak a single solitary word, not even the slightest hairsbreadth of a thought or feeling or idea or opinion, that even remotely runs the risk of SEEMING "Satanic" to someone else". If he had ruled thus, this entire forum would have had to shut down, because if you've checked the theology, debate, or congregational sections lately, Christians themselves are quite fond of invective which labels even Biblically-derived concepts themselves as "satanic" and "deception" for no greater reason than that they simply disagree with either the statement being made or the continued existence of the person making it.

I am certain whatever Erwin intended by ruling against the "promotion of Satanism", it was NOT to provide domineering control-freak types with ammunition to force cookie-cutter-clone conformity in THEIR own image onto everyone else who joins this site.
 
Upvote 0

Moriah_Conquering_Wind

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2006
23,327
2,234
✟34,174.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The picture is a melding of Pinhead and Uncle Sam in the classic "I want you!" pose.

Oh well...sometimes my sense of humor can be off...
Not to me it isn't! ^_^ I sooooo need to have a copy of that now. Got a PDF or somesuch?
 
Upvote 0

Jebediah

Senior Veteran
Dec 8, 2005
2,639
220
48
✟3,940.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Ya want to do a duet to the Devil, then?
We can call it our opinion.;)

I actually think that would be interesting. A classical dialogue-style sonnet, with alternating praise and condemnation. It would almost be a meditation...could be done with almost any spiritual force, a meditation on positive and negative relation.

Neat idea.
 
Upvote 0

icedtea

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2006
22,183
1,738
Ohio
✟30,909.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I am certain whatever Erwin intended by ruling against the "promotion of Satanism", it was NOT to provide domineering control-freak types with ammunition to force cookie-cutter-clone conformity in THEIR own image onto everyone else who joins this site.
You are wise on this. Erwin too. Good thing he has a level head.
How to get this through to the ammo people...:scratch:
 
Upvote 0

icedtea

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2006
22,183
1,738
Ohio
✟30,909.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
foul ball, Dr.steve.
HD does NOT share my opinion on sonnets for Satan.
She is vehemently against that kind of thing.
Actually, I've never read one, so Have no opinion as of yet.
Never got into poetry much, but could even appreciate a certain poem by Ginsberg. Not my cup of tea, but almost lyrical.
 
Upvote 0

psalms 91

Legend
Dec 27, 2004
71,903
13,538
✟134,786.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I think the statement that we need to nail it down may be correct. We are operating on 5 Christian principles, not other religions therefore anything that glorifies or lifts up anything that is not Christian is promotion in my opinion. There is a difference between promotion and honest debate but there are certain areas set aside for that. ZIt shouldnt be in your face type thing.
 
Upvote 0

Moriah_Conquering_Wind

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2006
23,327
2,234
✟34,174.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I think the statement that we need to nail it down may be correct. We are operating on 5 Christian principles, not other religions therefore anything that glorifies or lifts up anything that is not Christian is promotion in my opinion. There is a difference between promotion and honest debate but there are certain areas set aside for that. ZIt shouldnt be in your face type thing.
Imagining offense is offered where none has been is a very typical human error though. And it is not fair to force another to bear the weight of what one chooses to eisegete in the face of all clarification to the contrary.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.