- Dec 18, 2017
- 15,554
- 10,400
- 79
- Country
- New Zealand
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
When the Magi followed the Star signifying the birth of a King - did this indicate astrology is to be embraced by believers?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hello Carl, has new information surfaced confirming that the Magi were astrologers, not astronomers? (as I'm sure you know, this topic is one that is always debated/has never been proven, one way or the other .. in fact, I've read articles insinuating that they were both)When the Magi followed the Star signifying the birth of a King - did this indicate astrology is to be embraced by believers?
No. The Old Testament forbids astrology. (Deuteronomy 4:19)When the Magi followed the Star signifying the birth of a King - did this indicate astrology is to be embraced by believers?
Hello Carl, has new information surfaced confirming that the Magi were astrologers, not astronomers? (as I'm sure you know, this topic is one that is always debated/has never been proven, one way or the other .. in fact, I've read articles insinuating that they were both)
If it has, please link us to the article(s) so that we can read it for ourselves.
Thanks
Merry Christmas!!
--David
No.When the Magi followed the Star signifying the birth of a King - did this indicate astrology is to be embraced by believers?
My understanding is that in those days, astrology was closely linked to astronomy; the study of the stars and night sky.Mmmm... not one voice wanting to defend the practice...
My understanding is that in those days, astrology was closely linked to astronomy; the study of the stars and night sky.
There is nothing wrong with that.
The Lord just met these Magi where they were and used something they would understand - a star - to announce the news of his Son.
Today, astrology has come to mean predicting the future, or claiming that a person's personality, and what s going to happen to them, is based on the stars/planets.
But we can still use this for a conversation about the Gospel - if we talk about, and point to, the One who made the stars.
No, because of this:When the Magi followed the Star signifying the birth of a King - did this indicate astrology is to be embraced by believers?
What about astrology?
What about the role of astrology itself in this account? Although astrology was popular among Gentiles, it wasn’t so among Jews, many of whom looked down on it. This in itself argues that Matthew’s tradition about the magi is historically accurate. It’s not the kind of thing that Jewish Christians would make up.
However, while astrology wasn’t as popular among Jews as among Gentiles, it did exist. Genesis says that God made the sun, moon, and stars “to separate the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years” (1:14). This could mean that they are simply to be timekeeping markers. But some Jews thought that their function as “signs” included information about future events. Thus, the Dead Sea Scrolls contain astrological texts.
In the ancient world, there was no rigid distinction between astronomy and astrology. It’s only in the last few centuries that the two have been disentangled. This happened as scientists discovered what the effects the sun, moon, and stars do and don’t have on life here on Earth.
Even Thomas Aquinas, based on the science of his day, thought that the heavenly bodies had an influence on the passions and could, for example, make a man prone to anger—but not in such a way that it would overwhelm his free will (Commentary on Matthew 2:1-2, ST I:115:4, II-II:95:5).