- Nov 8, 2012
- 2,499
- 56
- 67
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- UK-Greens
Think of Philosophy as the upper hierarchy of the Physical Sciences, maybe.
You do, maybe
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Think of Philosophy as the upper hierarchy of the Physical Sciences, maybe.
The book The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow (and sitting on my desk at the moment) concludes and asserts discoveries in science - not only biological sciences or 'evolution' - make God 'irrelevant' and therefore non-existant. I do not concur, although I very much appreciate Dr. Hawking's work.No one actually makes this claim. It's the YEC set that somehow comes to this conclusion.
Affirmative.Just to clarify : Moses writes about the creation of the first man, then creates the first woman from the man --- no details about human evolution and our distant cousins
Ouch! I've been pointing your reaction - in theory - to many who cling to YEC because their parents or some 'preacher' told them to do so if they want to go to Heaven. I hope I can help.
....
Affirmative.
And just to clarify, I believe Adam wrote the original account.
This means Moses, when he copied it, gave his assent to its veracity.
You gave up all this:I only got drawn into it much later on, but it certainly had nothing to do with my decision to stop living a lie
What does living a lie have to do with creation or evolution? We have firmly established that one can be a Christian and believe in evolution.Thank you for your reply
I only got drawn into it much later on, but it certainly had nothing to do with my decision to stop living a lie
Not really. My position is argument, but I think defensible.... don't both Paul and Jesus accept the writings of Moses with respect to the creation of man?
By reading the Tablet Theory.You do? Really? Really? Okay - how did you arrive at that conclusion?
....
I see no conflict. Just as I don't see a conflict between Jesus and gravitational theory, even though Genesis 1:17, if taken literally, contradicts gravitational theory.
-Papias
Not really. My position is argument, but I think defensible.
Paul probably did understand Creation as a seven day event. It was the standard accepted 'understanding' at the time. Paul, being an educated man of the 1st Century, knew about as much as other well educated men of the era. Paul believed in 'good faith'.
(I sometimes wonder what humans will think of our knowledge in another millennia or so.)
Jesus, as God, knew better. But to bring up the matter would require a major explanation and some amount of time. The difference between the YEC belief and a longer time process is not important for salvation, or for accepting the Lordship of Jesus. So I think Jesus simply refrained from making a side show of it.
By reading the Tablet Theory.
What does living a lie have to do with creation or evolution? We have firmly established that one can be a Christian and believe in evolution.
The Tablet Theory.What?
The Wiseman hypothesis, sometimes called the tablet theory, is a theory of the authorship and composition of the Book of Genesis which suggests that Moses compiled Genesis from tablets handed down through Abraham and the other patriarchs.
The Tablet Theory.
You know ... the Wiseman Hypothesis?
Well now you do.Nope
You gave up all this:
Hebews 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
Hebrews 6:5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
... to embrace evolution?
Did you have them in the first place?Nope
Well now you do.![]()
Did you have them in the first place?