If God takes away our knowledge of good and evil then we cannot serve him out of choice.
The choice is to have the knowledge of rightoeusness, or to have the knowledge of good and evil. Adam and Eve weren't will-less robots. God saw that it was
good.
That sounds like a grunge band, or some sort of application for Linux
Adam and Eve didn't request for such a tree but God placed it there so that their loyalty could be tested. God's response to the sin problem is not taking away our knowledge of sin. It is not taking away the law.
I think it IS taking away the law, or rather, to let us DIE to the law. Apart from the commandment, sin is dead. So we must somehow be removed from the law, from the knowledge of good and evil.
That probably sounds kind of theoretical. Let me take an example from everyday life:
Let's say I want to be the best husband my wife can imagine. I meet some other beautiful girl who's interested in me, but I'm determined to Do The Right Thing and keep my promises etc, and besides I've read all kinds of books and advice that a husband shall not fool around with other women. So I get home and I can proudly declare that this gorgeous woman tried to get me to bed, and it was so tempting, but since I'm Doing The Right Thing, I turned her down. Go me!
OR
This woman approaches me, but since my mind is only on my wife and how beautiful she is and how much I love her, and not on some sort of rule that demands that I stay faithful, I don't even consider fooling around with anybody else.
The law, in effects, says "look here! Doesn't this look delicious! Don't you wish you could enjoy this and that!" The law makes you look on yourself and on sin. But when you look at the Lord, you won't be concerned with what is right or wrong to do. The more you look on Him, the more you
become like Him.
To a carnal man not a spiritual man. The carnal man would sin even if its only 1 law.
I agree. But then again the law
is for the carnal man, not for the righteous.
No. Moses knew the law before it was given. Adam ate the fruit because of Eve without any knowledge of new knowledge. Eve was tempted by the devil, and deceived to believe that things would be better. They didn't have a meeting with God and request good and evil.
But they did know their eyes would be opened. Of course, they didn't know what they would get to know... but, you know...
OK, that got complicated...
I think the point of the story of Eden is that God allows us all to choose - we can either try to live according to the knowledge of good and evil, or we can decide to simply know
Him.
As I said before the law is not an instrument of death to the spiritual man but only to the carnal man. You blame the law for sin instead of the individuals who sin. The law is not going to be thrown in the lake of fire but individuals are, they are guilty. Yielding to God's spirit will prevent a man from sin so the law cannot have a bad effect on such a person. If you think God's law is an instrument of death to everybody then the law cannot be holy just and good.
The law is good, but it has a specific purpose - to make sin exceedingly sinful and to kill the sinner. I don't blame the law for sin, but again, without the law, sin is dead. One can't use the law for anything but what God gave it to do. You can't somehow use the law to make neither a sinner nor a saint sin any less. The righteous person has nothing to do with the law in the first place. The law doesn't apply to us. But if I
try to apply it, the law will do what the law has always done - it becomes the power of sin yet again.
For example, I don't normally think about porn, and porn isn't even an issue for me - that is, until I make some sort of law for myself, like "I shall not watch porn". What happens then? I start thinking about porn! And the more I try to live according to that commandment, the more I think about it, and it's just a matter of time before I give in. Yes, it was I who chose to do it, and the commandment was good, but yet again, it turned out to be the power of sin.
The less concerned I am with keeping some law, and the more concerned I am with the simple fact that I AM righteous, the more righteously I will behave.
What we need to address is the meaning of being dead to the law. You have that to mean that the law has absolutely no effect on those who are dead to the law but that is not the meaning. If so then why would the carnal man who is not subject to the law of God be condemned by it?
The carnal man IS subject to the law. That is, the jews were given the written law, but we gentiles had the "demands of the law" written in our hearts as well. So we were all guilty.
If Christians are dead to the law looking at it by you interpretation, why does God write his law on our hearts in the new covenant.
I don't think the law in question here are the ten commandments. The ten commandments are the ministry of death, and God obviously doesn't want the ministry of death in our hearts. That's what we had in our hearts BEFORE we were born again.
And if Christians are dead to the law, by you interpretation why do the saints keep the commandments? Regardless of what you believe those commandments are shouldn't they be dead to it so then as you explained shouldn't they not be able to keep them.
I believe that I, as a believer, born again, saint, saved person, is commanded simply to believe on Him whom He has sent. That's all. That's not a "law" that I'm "dead" to. The law, again, is for the wicked and ungodly, not for the saints.
The fact is that being dead to the law really means being dead to sin.
Yes, but that's because dying to sin is a
consequence of being dead to the law.
Paul seems to focus on the law at first but as he went on he explained that the problem was not the law but the sin. Sin is the problem and not the law. The Law was around and Jesus did not sin.
True, but as we know, He is the only one to ever do that.
I didn't think you meant naked in the physical sense. Sorry about that. Why don't you compare the law to the law and not the law to sin. When God told them not to eat of the forbidden fruit it was a command thus it is the firstfruits of the law.
Well then let us KEEP that commandment!
And NOT eat of the forbidden fruit! Trying to live according to the law=eating the forbidden fruit.
If you are not tempted then you cannot make a choice.
True, but the real problem isn't that SIN is so tempting. It's the knowledge of good and evil that is so tempting. I'm still tempted by it, even though I am really dead to it. Even though I'm restored back to the condition Adam was in before he fell, I still get tempted by learing about good and evil.
2 things.
1. I didn't say that love causes you to keep the law but the bible said so, you are not agreeing with the bible if you say that it doesn't really.
Love doesn't make me keep the law, because love simply isn't concerned with the law. When I love, I do good to people simply because I love them. It's not like I love somebody, and therefore I go to the law to figure out how I should treat them.
I think the point is that when you love, you obviously don't steal or murder or covet etc etc. You could say the same about most earthly laws, too: I don't steal from people, French and Jamaican laws demand that you don't steal, therefore I keep/fulfill French and Jamaican laws... but of course, I'm not at all concerned with how I measure up to French and Jamaican laws, because I live in Norway.
2. You need to redefine for me what you believe it means to be under the law.
I believe it means to be "under" the knowledge of good and evil. Just like children; they can't do anything wrong until they aquire some sort of knowledge that "this is good and that is bad". Until then, they simply express themselves, and they do what they see their parents do - and that's the whole point: God Himself is our father! We aren't to try and comply with some list over dos and don'ts, but simply keep our eyes on Dad. Even Jesus did that! He said He didn't do anything of Himself, He simply did what He saw His Father do. The more a child looks at his parents, the more he will act like them.
No. The only way a carnal man can please God is by accepting him in his life. Without God in your life what sense is keeping the law. The law will not save or transform a carnal man only God can.
True.