Very good, an actual historical source the only problem is that is not what Aristotle said. I looked it up online. The first site did not have the phrase 'there is a difference between punishment (τιμωρια) and correction (κολασις),' in any form. The second said this,
Aristotle Rhetoric Book 1 chapter 12[not 10]
[17] But there is a difference between revenge and punishment; the latter is inflicted in the interest of the sufferer, the former in the interest of him who inflicts it, that he may obtain satisfaction..
Aristotle, Rhetoric, book 1
It looks like the Hell No! crowd will believe anything online, without verifying it, as long as it supports their UR assumptions/presuppositions.
Would you like to review the 26 verses I posted multiple times, which described/define "aionios" as "eternal,""for ever,""everlasting?" Here is a sample of three verses where Jesus, Himself, states that "aionios life" means "shall not perish." No, ifs, ands or buts.
John 10:28
(28) I give them eternal [aionios] life, and they shall never [aion] perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand.
In this verse Jesus parallels “aionios” and “aion” with “[not] snatch them out of my hand”, “never perish.” If “aion/aionios” means “age(s), a finite period,” that is not the opposite of “[not] snatch them out of my hand’/never perish” “Aionios life” by definition here means “eternal life.”
John 3:15
(15) That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal [aionion] life.
John 3:16
(16) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting [aionion] life.
In these two verses Jesus parallels “aionion” with “should not perish,” twice. Believers could eventually perish in a finite period, thus by definition “aionion life” here means eternal or everlasting life.
Now quote me some Aristotle or Ramelli that shows Jesus was wrong.