• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Christian Universalism. What's not to like?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
35
Shropshire
✟193,879.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
No, we don't have to listen to experts when they present bad arguments. His argument relied on English grammar and then he falsely stated it was the same in Greek.

He's a Yale professor so I expect that he doesn't tend to make "bad" arguments. It's funny too how such highly regarded scholars as David Bentley Hart and Ilaria Ramelli make the same bad argument. Other scholars may disagree with them but they do not question their credentials or accuse them of making "bad" arguments.

You recognize your inability to comment on Greek grammar, but the issue is elementary in grammar because it's a matter of identifying the subject of the sentence

I do recognise my inability to comment on Greek grammar. It's a shame that you don't. You admit to having only have a basic grasp of Greek and that does not allow you to give an informed opinion on this matter over and against professional academics who are so qualified.

Appealing to the man's credentials as if that defends his bad argument is the definition of an appeal to authority, because you don't have the sophistication to make an evaluation.

I think if the people I listed above all say the same thing, and it's not rocket science anyway, essentially just that "all" does indeed mean "all", then I am perfectly sophisticated enough to make a well-informed decision to be guided by their opinion. I note that you haven't cited any sources in support of your argument, presumably choosing instead to rely on your self-admittedly "basic" skills.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lazarus Short
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,526
15,878
Washington
✟1,030,629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I do not know one single thing about what you have done in the last 50 years.

I was only suggesting and as silly as it sounds.....was trying to help.

As I said clearly.....reject it and ignore it.

Fair enough. And wasn't being serious. But just so you know, I was raised in a Christian household. I have numerous relatives who have been in ministry. My oldest family members at the time were founding members of Grace Community Church where John MacArthur is the pastor. I remember when he was the new pastor. I started receiving a Christian education back around 1968. I've been to Bible college and also taught and been a lay pastor etc. In other words, I've been around the Biblical, doctrinal and theological block some.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lazarus Short
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,526
15,878
Washington
✟1,030,629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
When I was 12 years old, I came to Christ from listening to E.J. Daniels and Billy Graham.

They made hell sound as bad as did the Bible and I decided that I did not want to go there.

Later.....20 years later I learned about the grace and love and mercy of God that He would save me from such a fate.

My attitude towards hell for a long time was, that's between them and God. Then around 2007 my cousin who's like a younger brother started questioning it. He was also raised a Christian graduated from a Christian college so he knew his stuff. His questioning led me to start exploring the theology more deeply to come up with some answers for him.
 
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,526
15,878
Washington
✟1,030,629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Why not study the difference between Armenians and Calvinists.

Then what about "General" and "Specific" predestination.

I would also suggest a look at the law of Causality. Another way of saying this is that every effect is determined by its cause. Also, every cause determines its effect. This word "determines" may recall to some minds what is known in philosophy as the doctrine of determinism.

According to Christian theologian Norman Geisler, (When Skeptics Ask, 32)
"God did not create the world in time; He is responsible for the creation of time. There was no time "before" time. There was only eternity" .

By "eternity," Geisler does not mean a series of moments without beginning or end (eternal time). He means God's eternal nature itself. Before God created, all that existed was God.

Colossians 1:16.......
"For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him."

This is just a thought and feel free to ignore it and reject it.

That's great info, thanks.
My remark was strictly related to the discussion about UR having a predestination view of it's own. I think along those lines, rather than everyone being predestined to be saved, it's more like they'll be restored to God's original design. Note, that's viewing it from a UR perspective. I'm not saying I know that's how it will actually work out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lazarus Short
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,125
6,151
EST
✟1,149,827.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
He's a Yale professor so I expect that he doesn't tend to make "bad" arguments. It's funny too how such highly regarded scholars as David Bentley Hart and Ilaria Ramelli make the same bad argument. Other scholars may disagree with them but they do not question their credentials or accuse them of making "bad" arguments. * * *
I have said Ilaria Ramelli was quoted as making a "bad argument" right here on CF more than once. Someone quoted Ramelli as saying "Origen spoke of 'after eternal life' many times. in Origen's commentary on the book of John." I bought the digital edition $30.00 +/-. In that book Origen mentioned "after eternal life" one time and it had absolutely nothing to do with the salvation of men.
Here is a quote from Ramelli who I refer to as the high priestess of UR.
"But even the aiónes will come to an end, Origen tells us: “After aiónios life a leap will take place and all will pass from the aeons to the Father, who is beyond aiónios life. For Christ is Life, but the Father, who is ‘greater than Christ,’ is greater than life” (Comm. in Io 13.3; quoted in Ramelli, p. 160)."
Sometimes Eternity Ain’t Forever: Aiónios and the Universalist Hope
And here is what Origen actually said.
Origen Commentary On The Gospel Of John Book Thirteen[1]
(18) For, as there, the bridegroom leaps upon souls that are more noble-natured and divine, called mountains, and skips upon the inferior ones called hills, so here the fountain that appears in the one who drinks of the water that Jesus gives leaps into eternal life.
(19) And after eternal life, perhaps it [the fountain v.18] will also leap into the Father who is beyond eternal life. For Christ is life; but he who is greater than Christ is greater than life.20[2] Pg. 23​
Contrary to the assertion by UR high priestess Ilaria Ramelli and her loyal followers, here is the one and only time Origen mentions “after eternal life.”
Note the context, Origen is not talking about the fate of believers he is talking about the well of water, John 4:14. Origen is saying after the well of water springs into eternal life perhaps, not for certain, it [the well of water] springs into the Father because the Father is beyond eternal life.
Ramelli also says "aionios" never means eternal, everlasting, for ever. Here is how Origen describes eternal life.
......
(59) He [Heracleon] is not wrong, however, when he says that the water that the Savior gives is of his spirit and power.[John 4:14]
(60) And he has explained the statement, “But he shall not thirst forever,” as follows with these very words: For the life he gives is eternal and never perishes, as, indeed, does the first life which comes from the well; the life he gives remains. For the grace and the gift of our Savior is not to be taken away, nor is it consumed, nor does it perish, when one partakes of it.
[1] Origen. (1993). Commentary on the Gospel according to John Books 13–32. (T. P. Halton, Ed., R. E. Heine, Trans.) (Vol. 89, pp. 67–69). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.
[2] Origen. (1993). Commentary on the Gospel according to John Books 13–32. (T. P. Halton, Ed., R. E. Heine, Trans.) (Vol. 89, pp. 72–73). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.​
Eternal life *never perishes, twice, *remains, *is not taken away and *is not consumed. That is certainly eternal to me.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
35
Shropshire
✟193,879.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
I think along those lines, rather than everyone being predestined to be saved, it's more like they'll be restored to God's original design

I'd be interested in learning what the distinction is. Is it that being "saved" carries the connotation of being saved from torment/torture/annihilation or some other kind of frightfulness while restoration is towards something positive (unity with God)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lazarus Short
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,526
15,878
Washington
✟1,030,629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It's not citing expert opinion, it's when you hold up the opinion because of their credentials. It's a special class of ad hominem known as argument from authority. This is especially an issue if you yourself do not have the ability to examine the validity of the argument at even a basic level and instead are simply relying on the claim that they are an expert.

It seems clear to me that the UR proponents here have more than a basic level of understanding, and that they're familiar with whom they're talking about and what they teach.
 
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,526
15,878
Washington
✟1,030,629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'd be interested in learning what the distinction is. Is it that being "saved" carries the connotation of being saved from torment/torture/annihilation or some other kind of frightfulness while restoration is towards something positive (unity with God)?

It's being saved from sin. Many testimonies of those who were saved, is that before coming to Christ, their life was a living hell. People who are addicts and alcoholics etc are trying to fill a God shaped void.
 
Upvote 0

Hmm

Hey, I'm just this guy, you know
Sep 27, 2019
4,866
5,027
35
Shropshire
✟193,879.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
It's being saved from sin. Many testimonies of those who were saved, is that before coming to Christ, their life was a living hell.

Okay, thanks for the explanation.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟211,285.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That's great info, thanks.
My remark was strictly related to the discussion about UR having a predestination view of it's own. I think along those lines, rather than everyone being predestined to be saved, it's more like they'll be restored to God's original design. Note, that's viewing it from a UR perspective. I'm not saying I know that's how it will actually work out.

I understand your thinking.

However.....the problem is not God but you and me.

Man broke God's perfect design because God allowed man to have the Freedom of Choice.

That means we are not robots but able to think, evaluate and choose.

The only way that love for anyone is lasting and real is that if it comes from a heart out of love.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟211,285.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
My attitude towards hell for a long time was, that's between them and God. Then around 2007 my cousin who's like a younger brother started questioning it. He was also raised a Christian graduated from a Christian college so he knew his stuff. His questioning led me to start exploring the theology more deeply to come up with some answers for him.

MMXX. Graduating from college does not mean that anyone "knows their stuff".

Sometimes.....people are educated beyond their intelligence!!!!

I have actually graduated from 2 colleges and I learn stuff every day. But the only stuff that is lasting and matters is what God says.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟211,285.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Fair enough. And wasn't being serious. But just so you know, I was raised in a Christian household. I have numerous relatives who have been in ministry. My oldest family members at the time were founding members of Grace Community Church where John MacArthur is the pastor. I remember when he was the new pastor. I started receiving a Christian education back around 1968. I've been to Bible college and also taught and been a lay pastor etc. In other words, I've been around the Biblical, doctrinal and theological block some.

That is exciting to hear. Do you remember when it was that you began to have a liberal slant to your theology?
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟211,285.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That is incorrect.

There are two main versions of the Talmud, the Babylonian Talmud and the Jerusalem Talmud. Some of the contents are shocking.

The rabbinic teachings of the Talmud explain in great detail how the commandments of the Torah are to be carried out.

Both are Jewish....right?

The Talmud is made up of two separate works: the Mishnah, primarily a compilation of Jewish laws, written in Hebrew and edited sometimes around 200 C.E. in Israel; and the Gemara, the rabbinic commentaries and discussions on the Mishnah, written in Hebrew and Aramaic, which emanated from Israel and Babylonia over the next three hundred years. There are two Talmuds: the Y’rushalmi or Jerusalem Talmud (from Israel) and the Bavli or Babylonian Talmud. The Babylonian Talmud, which was edited after the Jerusalem Talmud and is much more widely known, is generally considered more authoritative than the Jerusalem Talmud.
The Talmud | Reform Judaism
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,121
3,224
45
San jacinto
✟218,501.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
He's a Yale professor so I expect that he doesn't tend to make "bad" arguments. It's funny too how such highly regarded scholars as David Bentley Hart and Ilaria Ramelli make the same bad argument. Other scholars may disagree with them but they do not question their credentials or accuse them of making "bad" arguments.
Having interacted with the products of high level schools I am not impressed by such academic credentials. They tend to indicate schmoozing and influence more than academic prowess. People from great schools make bad arguments all the time. People especially make bad arguments when they are attempting to defend something they are emotionally attached to, which UR proponents generally are.



I do recognise my inability to comment on Greek grammar. It's a shame that you don't. You admit to having only have a basic grasp of Greek and that does not allow you to give an informed opinion on this matter over and against professional academics who are so qualified.
I recognize your inability to comment on Greek grammar, but you have no idea what my grasp of Greek grammar is other than that I wouldn't consider myself an expert. I have enough of a grasp to resolve simple issues and understand grammatical arguments and see when they're flawed. Considering you don't have a basic grasp of grammar you're in no position to truly determine who is an expert and who is just a hack with some letters after their name.



I think if the people I listed above all say the same thing, and it's not rocket science anyway, essentially just that "all" does indeed mean "all", then I am perfectly sophisticated enough to make a well-informed decision to be guided by their opinion. I note that you haven't cited any sources in support of your argument, presumably choosing instead to rely on your self-admittedly "basic" skills.
Yes, "all" means "all." But all what?
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,121
3,224
45
San jacinto
✟218,501.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It seems clear to me that the UR proponents here have more than a basic level of understanding, and that they're familiar with whom they're talking about and what they teach.
2 Tim. 4:3 seems relevant.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,121
3,224
45
San jacinto
✟218,501.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Does that really fit regarding a view that doesn't apply to those who hold to it?
As DA said, if it walks like a duck.

To expand, when people state they would choose eternal hell over loving a God that would send people to hell their itchy ears seek teachers who teach that God would never. The Bible poses it a different way, though, in asking "would you annul my justice to vindicate yourself?"
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Major1
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,125
6,151
EST
✟1,149,827.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
* * * All your citations from the Rabbinic tradition are heretical. Why not cite the Talmud where they have Jesus burning in boiling excrement?
Do try to rejoice in Christ once in a while, der Alte
.
I am still waiting for credible, verifiable, historical evidence for anything you say.
Even if true how does this reflect anything, good or bad, about the historical beliefs, faith and practices of the Jews? Would the Jews make up detrimental lies about their own faith etc?
OBTW didn't the Jews make up lies about Jesus during in His own lifetime?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Major1
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,526
15,878
Washington
✟1,030,629.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I understand your thinking.

However.....the problem is not God but you and me.

Man broke God's perfect design because God allowed man to have the Freedom of Choice.

That means we are not robots but able to think, evaluate and choose.

The only way that love for anyone is lasting and real is that if it comes from a heart out of love.

What I go by is that everyone has a God shaped void that needs to be filled. And those who are unsaved try to fill that void, that need, desire, hunger, longing with other things. They try to fill it with self-fulfillment. They try to fill it with drugs and alcohol etc. Of course God gives us the free will to do that, but He also knows that we will never be truly satisfied, and that we will always have that longing for Him, because that's how He designed us. It's what He designed us for.

Coincidental to that belief I have, is that the idea of universal reconciliation and restoration, which is that all mankind will be restored to what God designed and created mankind for.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hmm
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.