• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Christian Forums Under New Management

Status
Not open for further replies.

NorrinRadd

Xian, Biblicist, Fideist, Pneumatic, Antinomian
Sep 2, 2007
5,571
595
Wayne Township, PA, USA
✟8,652.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Whether the rules are many or few, specific or vague, there will be problems.

It *should* be enough to just say, "Love your neighbor as yourself. Treat others as you would like them to treat you." But we know from experience and Scripture that those are NOT enough. All the writers of the New Testament had to "flesh out" those basics to deal with specific cases.

On message boards, if the rules are few and general, are easy to simply ignore. But if they are many and specific, it invites the participants to become as the Pharisees, who delighted in mastering the minutiae of their laws and twisting them to their own advantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Latreia
Upvote 0

psalms 91

Legend
Dec 27, 2004
71,903
13,538
✟134,786.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Actually it isnt if people would respect other peoples areas and hold opposing views in the forums designed for that. We can talk about all these things but a lack of respect for oyther peopels areas is a large part of the problem. There is a reason the congregational areas started walling off. Eliminate that problem and you eliminate a lot of the reports as well as the problems.
 
Upvote 0

Thirst_For_Knowledge

I Am A New Title
Jan 20, 2005
6,610
340
42
Michigan
Visit site
✟8,524.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
That's impossible.


As saw with as little interpretation as possible.

We can certainly narrow down "no flaming".

It is a "flame" to say that someone who is gay is going to hell? I bet one mod would say yes, and another one would say no. If we narrowed that down, there wouldn't be any room for interpretation.
 
Upvote 0
S

Servant222

Guest
Lee has paid a not inconsiderable sum for CF.

He has every right to say 'My site, my rules'

And therein lies the potential problem- Erwin ran the site as a non-profit venture, and now it seems as if the ultimate most important motive is likely profit, not promotion of God.

And then there is the matter of democracy- a philosophy of "my site, my rules" is not as likely to succeed as a more democratic one. Christianity flourishes when there is peace, stability, the rule of law, free speech and democracy. Even in Jesus's time, He was allowed to freely promote his ideas and values in the synagoges of Galilee.

Yes, occasionally, benevolent dictators come along and actually do good, but most of the time, it is democratic systems that succeed, and have the best chance of taking the ideas of many people, and incorporating them into something that is much better than any one person can hope for.

So I would make two suggestions to LeeD:

1. As quickly as possible, give power and control of Christian Forums to a board of the most experienced Christian advisors you can get. Solicit the help of well-known and experienced Christian educators and preachers of the calibre of James Dobson or Billy Graham to help.

2. Run Christian Forums as a not-for-profit venture. Pay to get the best possible advisors, but make the successful dissimination of the salvation message to all the world's people to be the most important goal.
 
Upvote 0

psalms 91

Legend
Dec 27, 2004
71,903
13,538
✟134,786.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Guess it comes down to what area are you in. Is it appropriate or is it baiting? As I said respect the areas you are in and keep the debates where they belong. I agree that this thread is about posting for Lee and not debate so from now on will just report debate and ask that the thread be cleaned.
 
Upvote 0

Stormy

Senior Contributor
Jun 16, 2002
9,441
868
St. Louis, Mo
Visit site
✟59,554.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
As saw with as little interpretation as possible.

We can certainly narrow down "no flaming".

It is a "flame" to say that someone who is gay is going to hell? I bet one mod would say yes, and another one would say no. If we narrowed that down, there wouldn't be any room for interpretation.

I would think it a flame if you told anyone they were going to Hell.. its not your call.
 
Upvote 0
S

Servant222

Guest
This is a Christian site and needs to FIRST and foremost meet the needs of the Body of Christ.
(my bold add).

Absolutely fundamental!

God has given this site an incredible opportunity: to be the number 1 site to provide the message of salvation to all of the world.

Matthew 28:

19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."

This site may not be able to baptize on-line or share communion, but it can sure bring legions of people to a knowledge of Jesus.

And as I've said before- if you've been to oppressed and third world countries, where normal Christian ministry is difficult or impossible, you suddenly realize the incredible power of a site like this to bring the message of Jesus to ordinary people world-wide.

It is an awesome opportunity.

And an even more awesome responsibility.
 
Upvote 0

eldermike

Pray
Site Supporter
Mar 24, 2002
12,089
624
76
NC
Visit site
✟20,209.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
As saw with as little interpretation as possible.

We can certainly narrow down "no flaming".

It is a "flame" to say that someone who is gay is going to hell? I bet one mod would say yes, and another one would say no. If we narrowed that down, there wouldn't be any room for interpretation.
Rules based on what one says results in a failure to focus on whats really important. If you tell me I can't say something, I'll find another way to say it.
It's a heart thing, not a list of words or phrases.
 
Upvote 0

Stormy

Senior Contributor
Jun 16, 2002
9,441
868
St. Louis, Mo
Visit site
✟59,554.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
I would like the owner or one of the two people that he designated to answer this question..

Why the need to place a veil over the reporting process?


If there is nothing to hide then why hide?

It would help us all to see how the rules are being interpreted so that we will not break them.
 
Upvote 0

DarylFawcett

Ticket Support Manager
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2005
46,723
4,216
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟1,101,642.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I am reading this thread for the purpose of what is going to happen as a result of the things announced in this thread.

I am NOT interested in anything else here, therefore, please take these other side issues to another thread.
 
Upvote 0

DarylFawcett

Ticket Support Manager
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2005
46,723
4,216
Nova Scotia, Canada
Visit site
✟1,101,642.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Being one of the newer staff members here, after experiencing the interference, etc. in the reports, either the reports need to be in a private area, or only the mods have the ability to post in the open reports.
 
Upvote 0

Stormy

Senior Contributor
Jun 16, 2002
9,441
868
St. Louis, Mo
Visit site
✟59,554.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
Being one of the newer staff members here, after experiencing the interference, etc. in the reports, either the reports need to be in a private area, or only the mods have the ability to post in the open reports.

Why not allow others to speak if they stay within forum guidelines with their posts?

I do think that anonymous titles should be removed. This would probably eliminate a lot of the reporting, and also a lot of the problems in the report threads.

Christianity works better with the lights kept on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tulc
Upvote 0
S

Servant222

Guest
I think you're right. :) I think the rules should be as simple as possible... in my opinion, the temporary ones posted by Lee in the OP are good, and the site doesn't really need more rules than that. :)

I agree- why re-invent the wheel when the Bible already gives a pretty succinct set of rules:

Matthew 22:

36"Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" 37Jesus replied: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' 38This is the first and greatest commandment. 39And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' 40All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."
 
Upvote 0
C

cfFosterANGEL31

Guest
PTL PTL PTL!!! A real man of God is finally taking charge!!! As long as HE is being led by the LORD, let's listen, and respect the fact that he is on track with the way the Lord wants this forum to go, give him a chance!! This is what many of us have been praying for, and I know that most of us in the pets forum are just praising the Lord!!!! I thank you in advance for the changes that are going to be made(good bye wiki!!!!!!)
Praying for you Lee, you have a big job in front of you
Bonnie
 
Upvote 0

WalksWithChrist

Seeking God's Will
Jan 5, 2005
22,860
1,352
USA
Visit site
✟53,730.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Another question...

Are we again changing our web-address?

Are we going to be Christianforums.com?

Did lee buy both domains?
You can actually still type in "www.christianforums.com" and get here. I just tested that...it works.
:)

I do believe I read that Lee owns both domains. So switching back should just be a matter of coding.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.