physical characteristics are the obvious and needed difference to sustain these environments. In both environments the strongest survive and their "strongness" is passed down to the next generation. Comparing the strongest in different environments to see who is superior may be too difficult to measure.
Pluralism encourages critical thinking over segregation regardless of environmental factors but pluralism also increases the gene pool since more intermarry.
So the act of pulling someone out of their environment both stimulates critical thinking and increases the gene pool of their off spring, the latter may make race superiority immeasurable. Comparing strickly while still in their environments also is not fair because of critical thinking differences which are environment fostered.
If there are differences today it certainly is not big enough to matter that races don't naturally intermarry within pluralistic environments. Even within x environment the rich and powerful tend to interbreed with the rich and powerful producing off spring that are rich and powerful. But there's no special ingredient in their DNA that make them rich and powerful and most of the advantage is an environment that fosters the right thinking to keep them rich and powerful. X race may adopt Y race babies and they grow up as intelligent as as their adopted race is.
Hypothetically there could be a difference but our modern world is too pluralistic that the gene pool balances enough that the difference is not measurable. In fluid dynamics the process is called infusion and essentially it's the same thing happening with people. Over enough time it all balances out and there is no difference. Pluralism taken to the farest level will eliminate race all together and the other differences will be environmental.
Last edited:
Upvote
0