I already demonstrated that he was speaking about the washing of hands. You countered, by saying that Mark doesn't have that in it, so unclean food must be clean. To which I countered, and said that if the Messiah taught that all food is clean, then Peter wouldn't have refused to eat the unclean animals in the vision.
But he did refuse, which means that the Messiah did not teach that all food is clean. Because as I pointed out, He was talking about the washing of hands.
Peter, after thinking on the vision, realized it wasn't about meat, but about men. We know this because Peter interpreted the vision, and told us what it meant. He said the vision was referring to men, not animals. Your statement that it's literal meat is entirely unsupported.
Acts 10:28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any ***man*** common or unclean.
