Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have seen the power of elastic gravity, first hand.
There is nothing you will ever say, that will convince me that gravity can't be interrupted.
Gravity exhibits a quality of a law, that it can be interrupted - if you could do the same with Evolution, I would believe that too.
No gravity runs out and something becomes motionless in connection with that gravity.
Here is the link of what happens to gravity, in mid-air.
No, not really. Gravity continued as normal throughout. Why do you think they used a bungee cord instead of an inelastic rope?No gravity runs out and something becomes motionless in connection with that gravity.
Here is the link of what happens to gravity, in mid-air.
No, not really. Gravity continued as normal throughout. Why do you think they used a bungee cord instead of an inelastic rope?
Hint: because it stores energy.
What if... the right selection pressures were given, to revert the human race back to its beginning? Back through apes and fish and slime?
Interesting theory. We will get a head start on this when we start pairing Trump supporters with flat earthers.
Thanks for taking the thought, a little seriously.
I gave you a very simple explanation of what was happening. Your ignoring that explanation only makes you look foolish.Yes, but gravity where? That is the question.
Gravity "associated with" an object, does not necessarily exert an influence on that object - that is the point.
You are saying "no, there is energy stored elsewhere, so the transference of gravity is put off by that energy"... when - directly speaking - it does not.
I gave you a very simple explanation of what was happening. Your ignoring that explanation only makes you look foolish.
Yes, but gravity where? That is the question.
Gravity "associated with" an object, does not necessarily exert an influence on that object - that is the point.
You are saying "no, there is energy stored elsewhere, so the transference of gravity is put off by that energy"... when - directly speaking - it does not.
I explained in simple English how the force exerted by the bungee continued to counter the force of gravity for a short period after it was released. I specifically stated that gravity was never interrupted.Wait what? "Foolish"? Why is that word even in your vocabulary - if you believe everything can be Evolved?
I said gravity can stop
and I showed you
and your response was "unless you believe it is the energy associated with it that is responsible, I will not accept the observation"
I explained in simple English how the force exerted by the bungee continued to counter the force of gravity for a short period after it was released. I specifically stated that gravity was never interrupted.
Now you have the explanation readily available continuing to claim that gravity was stopped is foolish.
Countering the force of gravity is stopping it.
Everything else you say is just word salad?
Look again at the video: the gravity leaves the object in the air, for as long as elastic potential is working against it - the object itself does not divert gravity up the elastic so as to accelerate the descent.
If you had said "gravity affected both the object and the elastic attached to it, at the same time" then you would have grounds to say "gravity was not interrupted".
Everything else you say is just word salad?
Countering the force of gravity is stopping it.
No, I'm not saying that. Gravity acts on all the objects in the experiment at all times. Sometimes countering forces prevent those objects from falling under its influence. The bungee cord tension provides such a (temporary) countering force.Yes, but gravity where? That is the question.
Gravity "associated with" an object, does not necessarily exert an influence on that object - that is the point.
You are saying "no, there is energy stored elsewhere, so the transference of gravity is put off by that energy"... when - directly speaking - it does not.
Like I thought - you got out of that what you wanted to.No gravity runs out and something becomes motionless in connection with that gravity.
Nothing happens to gravity.Here is the link of what happens to gravity, in mid-air.
I think this is a battle of wits against an unarmed opponent....No it isn't. The gravity is still there.
I can lift my cup of coffee off the table when I have my breakfast, but that doesn't mean that gravity has ceased to exist from the cup's point of view.
Nothing you've mentioned is "interruption" of anything.Maybe the right interpretation for you, is that interrupting Evolution is not as important as interrupting it consistently...
You still think gravity is interrupted?But if you interrupt it consistently, how are you going to know it is any different, from everything else we interrupt consistently?
Can you interrupt Christianity?If you properly explained how Evolution could be interrupted (as a law), you would be able to prove Evolution worked (in a specific context, for a specific reason).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?