Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Okay..... I don't think I've seen you around here before... but you may come to notice after a while that any time people come out in support of things that AREN'T approved of by secular law, there is a whole slew of people who will come out and say that the Bible calls on us to follow our temporal leaders...But the people of God are called to a higher standard than secular law.
Actually they are just as easy to justify as any religious based ethical system.They can create what ever the heck they want but they cannot justify them rationally.
Yes they can.That's what you seem to be missing. They cannot justify the immorality of someone killing babies for fun.
BTW athiest say that there is no purpose in the world yet they create morals. They contradict themselves more than anyone like many other liberals.
The right to discriminate against a minority is a special rightWhat special rights though? I don't have a legal right to marry a person of the same-sex either.
You are absolutely, flat out, plain WRONG!
I had to go sign some trust documents this morning - not 12 hours ago - in order to ensure the same rights that you would receive by getting a $60 marriage license in King County.
My legal bills over the last 20 years, in order to keep up with you, come to more than $14,000.
Don't you DARE submit that we have equal rights.
If you think we do, then you owe me $13, 940 dollars...then we would be equal.
Give me just ONE good reason why YOU should enjoy SPEACIAL RIGHTS!
the same argument was used by those opposed to the marriage of Mildred and Richard Loving (ironic name huh?) it was stated that Mildred and Richard did not have the right to marry as they chose as their marriage violated the laws of God. Further it was stated that either Mildred or Richard could have married people of the correct skin color. It was an argument for racism .now you and DMagoh are using here to justify prejudice against another minority.What special rights though? I don't have a legal right to marry a person of the same-sex either.
Nope. No one is necesarily lying here... although the people who extrapolate that simplistic tribal laws of bronze age desert dwellers are applicable to modern urbanised societies may be misguided...
Okay..... I don't think I've seen you around here before... but you may come to notice after a while that any time people come out in support of things that AREN'T approved of by secular law, there is a whole slew of people who will come out and say that the Bible calls on us to follow our temporal leaders...
It gets a bit confusing trying to remember which bits of the Bible that contradict other bits of the Bible we are following on any given day
You will note, however, that the Timothy passage does NOT say that all scripture is inerrent, unalterable, and eternally applicable...Enemy,what purpose does God's Word serve in your life?If the Bible says 16All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17,
This is why God gave us the ability to reason as WELL as the Bible... so that, by using our reason AND appreciating Jesus' message, we may determine what he means for us todaywho gets to decide what is applicable today?
If the Bible were clearly written to apply to ALL circumstance and all situations, I'd be happy to follow its explicit and complete teachings... however, even the most devoted, literalist fundamentalist Christian is as guilty of "picking and choosing" which parts of the Bible to use as any of the rest of us... I am sure there are Bible verses that you yourself don't follow literally, whatever your justification for that may be. And if this is true, than the Bible is JUST as subjective for you as it is for me.If God left His Word with the intent that everyone gets to decide which parts are applicable to His life, then no one could ever have any measure of what truth is.
But there are parts of the Bible that you don't feel apply to you, so... is this a double standard, or what?You can ALWAYS tell when a suggestion for dealing with questions of faith are not of God.
The suggestions(just like yours to not havae certain things applicable) all open the door for confusion.
"render unto Caesar"Would a God Who does not author confusion tell you to obey a law of the land that goes against what He says?
The right to discriminate against a minority is a special right
The right to pretend that a minority does not have equality is a special right
The right to force personal prejudice onto society is a special right.
You didn't prove anything, all you showed is that your emotions come with ethics...which is illogical and unbiblical. The only rational system is the traditional christian system which perfectly explains ethics.What non Christian presuppositions? I'm Christian and have been all my life... I'm pretty sure that any pressupositions I have are actually fairly dense with Christian influence... but all that aside... are we still on the same topic?
You asked for a non religious, rational explanation for morality, right?
I provided you with one.
Now you are coming out with stuff about emotional world views and anti-intelectualism... I'm not sure we are talking about the same point anymore.
What do you think I have said that is anti-intellectual?
And arsenokoites doesnt translate as homosexual and there is no reason to believe that is what Paul meant when he wrote it. Ancient Greek has a handful of well known words meaning homosexual but he didnt use them
I'm sorry... bearing in mind that "God says" is not, in itself, a rational explanation, can you please explain the rationale behind the traditional Christian system?You didn't prove anything, all you showed is that your emotions come with ethics...which is illogical and unbiblical. The only rational system is the traditional christian system which perfectly explains ethics.
It's not what about God says, it's about how he DESIGNED his being to be. When we don't follow his purpose and design we are out what we are made to be therefore we are in sin or away from the target.I'm sorry... bearing in mind that "God says" is not, in itself, a rational explanation, can you please explain the rationale behind the traditional Christian system?
You will note, however, that the Timothy passage does NOT say that all scripture is inerrent, unalterable, and eternally applicable...This is why God gave us the ability to reason as WELL as the Bible... so that, by using our reason AND appreciating Jesus' message, we may determine what he means for us today.
If the Bible were clearly written to apply to ALL circumstance and all situations, I'd be happy to follow its explicit and complete teachings... however, even the most devoted, literalist fundamentalist Christian is as guilty of "picking and choosing" which parts of the Bible to use as any of the rest of us
... I am sure there are Bible verses that you yourself don't follow literally, whatever your justification for that may be.
And if this is true, than the Bible is JUST as subjective for you as it is for me.But there are parts of the Bible that you don't feel apply to you, so... is this a double standard, or what
"render unto Caesar"
apparently.
I think the record of Jesus works and words is pretty firm... not much room for confusion there...If God's Word is error filled, changeable, and not eternally applicable, where are you getting your Jesus message from?
So all the confusion surrounding the Bible implies what, exactly?If your method's author confusion, they are NOT of God.
However Jesus teaching does not explicitly cover every possible scenario or situation one may find ones' self in... the best we can do is attempt to apply the SPIRIT of Christ's teachings to situations that his direct teaching does not cover.Jesus Christ, the Living Word exampled in the Written Word is the standard.
But even (what you say is) God's word contradicts other bits of what is supposed to be God's word... I mean, according to your understaning, both "turn the other cheek" and "an eye for an eye" are God breathed, right? Well, kinda by definition, which ever one you follow in any given situation, you are rather necesarily disobeying the other, right?I'm sure there are too. But if someone points it out to me, I pray that God leads my spirit to align with Him and that HE forgives me for doing that which is sinful.
But I must first be able to admit that God's Word is right every time. If I did not, there could be no standard which by to live a Holy life because it would be open to everyone's opinion. And enter confusion again.
Would you use the Biblical definition to determine rape? Do you shave? Do you wear clothes of mixed fibre? do you think execution is suitable punishment for disobedient children? Are we saved by works, or is it acts? Is slavery acceptible to God? How about polygamy? What are your views on circumcision? Would you follow the Biblical directions for dealing with certain diseases or would you ask a doctor to treat you if you get sick?What parts of the Bible are you referring to? As a Christian, I have to apply ALL of God's Word to my life.
Compound words do not necessarily derive their meaning from the meaning of their component words.FYI... The Greek work "arsenokoites" is a compound word. "Arsen" meaning man (as in adult male) and "koites" meaning bed ("koites" comes from the Latin word "coitus" which should properly convey the subtext of the word). "Arsenokoites" literally means "manbedder." It is unclear if this "manbedder" means a homosexual man or a heterosexual man who sleeps around a lot.
The first component ("arsen") has a variant form. When a man is the recipient of the action, the compound is usually formed with "arren." Compound words formed with "arsen" indicate the man is doing the action. Therefore it is a reasonable conclusion that "arsenokoites" actually means a heterosexual man who have multiple/frequent sexual encounters. This translation actually makes more sense in the Scriptural context since the word "arsenokoites" appears in lists where all the other sins are sins of excess, not kind.
God bless.
Christian ethics is rational? That's a new one. I thought you just did what the Bible said, consequences to the wind.You didn't prove anything, all you showed is that your emotions come with ethics...which is illogical and unbiblical. The only rational system is the traditional christian system which perfectly explains ethics.
First off, it is indeed a silly argument.What argument. You said special rights and I just wanted you to explain how its a special right if NO ONE can do it.
You can marry the person of your choice just like everybody else if you do it within the confines of the law.
If a law is enacted that says same-sex couples can marry, then you go right ahead and marry. Just don't expect God's people to tell ya that it's of God.
But you can let go of the special rights stuff.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?