NightEternal wrote:
This is false. Christ had the sinless, unfallen nature of Adam before the entrance of sin.
Your conclusion is not remotely Biblical. It is based upon EGW alone.
-----------------------------------------
Your conclusion is correct NE - and supported both by scripture (John 14:30. "... the ruler (Prince) of this world is coming, and he has nothing in Me.", among others), and EGW. Sadly, most who argue from EGW do so by interpreting some of her writings the way the desire, even when in overall context, another interpretation is possible. But EGW strongly supported the sinless nature of Christ.
I understand that not all accept her authority. But to set the record straight, I quote from Letter 8, 1895, as published in the EGW Comments section of the SDABC Vol.5 p.1128,9. She is referring to John 14:30, also Luke 1:31-35, 1 Cor. 15:22,45; and Heb.4:15.
"Be careful, exceedingly careful as to how you dwell upon the human nature of Christ. Do not set Him before the people as a man with the propensities of sin. He is the second Adam. The first Adam was created a pure, sinless being, without a taint of sin upon him; he was in the image of God. He could fall, and he did fall through transgressing. Because of his sin his posterity was born with inherent propensities of disobedience. But Jesus Christ wass the only begotten Son of God. He took upon Himself human nature, and was tempted in all points as human nature is tempted. He could have sinned; He could have fallen, but not for one moment was there in Him an evil propensity. He was assailed with temptations in the wilderness, as Adam was assailed with temptations in Eden.
"Avoid every question in relation to the humanity of Christ which is liable to be misunderstood. Truth lies close to the track of presumption. In treating upon the humanity of Christ, you need to guard strenuously every assertion, lest your words be taken to mean more than they imply, and thus you lose or dim the clear perceptions of His humanity as combined with divinity. His birth was a miracle of God; for, said the angel, 'Behold, thou shalt conceive in they womb, and bring forth a son,and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end. Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man? And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.'
"These words do not refer to any human being, except to the Son of the infinite God. Never, in any way, leave the slightest impression upon human minds that a taint of, or inclination to, corruption rested upon Christ, or that He in any way yielded to corruption. He was tempted in all points as man is tempted, yet He is called 'that holy thing'. It is a mystery that is left unexplained to mortals that Christ could be tempted in all points as we are, and yet be without sin. The incarnation of Christ has ever been, and will ever remain a mystery. That which is revealed, is for us and for our children, but lete every human being be warned from the ground of making Christ altogether human, such a one as ourselves; for it cannot be. The exact time when humanity was blended with divinity, it is not necessary for us to know. We are to keep our feet on the Rock Christ Jesus, as God revealed in humanity.
"I perceive that there is danger in approaching subjects which dwell on the humanity of the Son of the infinite God. He did humble Himself when He saw He was in fashion as a man, that He might understand the force of all temptations wherewith man is beset.
"The first Adam fell; the second Adam held fast to God and His Word under the most trying of circumstance, and His faith in His Father's goodness, mercy, and love did not waver for one moment. 'It is written' was His weapon of resistance,and it is the sword of the Spirit which every human being is to use. 'Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me' - nothing to respond to temptation. On not one occasion was there a response to his manifold temptations. Not once did Christ step on Satan's ground, to give him anu advantage. Satan found nothing in Him to encourage his advances."
Sound advice for us here. There are numerous other quotations that could be cited from EGW on the sinless nature of Christ. A few (in brief - check the ref for more detail):
"Christ did not possess the same sinful, corrupt, fallen disloyalty we possess, for then He could not be a perfect offering."--Manuscript 94, 1893 (published in SM3, p131)
"In the fullness of time Christ was to be revealed in human form. He was to assume the position of head of humanity by taking the nature, but not the sinfulness of man."--Letter 91, 1900, p. 6. (published in Manuscript Releases vol.9 p237.)
My point is simply that EGW does not teach or support a fallen sinful nature in Christ. Weakened and diminished by 4000-odd years of sin, yes, human, yes, subject to all the pain, misery and suffering like us, yes. But without our sinfulness. She also repeatedly states that Christ in temptation passed over the same ground the first Adam did - proving Adam need never have fallen.