People are not dogs. They don't get Spayed or neutered.
I am learning so much about you....
Upvote
0
People are not dogs. They don't get Spayed or neutered.That is what I would do - get spayed before I had a chance to accidentally have a baby.
So, if you were in a coma... we could stab you and cut you into pieces? And it would not be murder?My standard for a right to life as it pertains to the thread topic (when abortions should be allowed, if a fetus should be a preemie, etc.) is that fetuses are not "viable" outside the uterus if they need to spend a a lot of timein the NICU with plastic tubes in their tiny noses and nouths,
Why does the fetus not have the same rights as a one day, one month or one year old?You are already born. The foetus is not. You have rights, the foetus has few.
Pro-choice people are not, and never have been or will be, pro-abortion. They just know it is immoral to force rape victims to carry a baby to term against her will and religious beliefs.
I don't know the word audacity. I also don't know why you assume pro-choice people want to dictate pro-life people.
The opposite is true: pro-lifers want to push theology against legal and biological information. Christians have no business proclaiming their faith controls the law in a country that was founded on total religious freedom (see hte First Amendment), which is what pro-life people do.
You are already born. The foetus is not. You have rights, the foetus has few.
Why does viability matter, exactly, in determining whether the fetus has a right to live? For the record, if I get into a car accident and need to be hooked up to machines to live, no one has the right to kill me.
How do you think they get the child out?
So, if you were in a coma... we could stab you and cut you into pieces? And it would not be murder?
People are not dogs. They don't get spayed or neutered.
I am learning so much about you....
Yes they do. Look up ovariohysterectomy anc castration.
Sorry, this is not the full picture at all. Comfortably over 90% of abortions are elective. To try to claim that pro-choice people simply "know it is immoral to force rape victims......etc etc" discounts the absolute, overwhelming majority who fight for the 'right' to choose purely out of convenience.
I think you mean vasectomy, humans generally don't get voluntarily castrated anymore.
Care to elaborate?...or Is that all you got?Faulty violinist analogy again
No, I meant castration.
People just don't want to be compared to cats.
Ahhh... IC
First, the violinist is artificially attached to the woman. A mother's unborn baby, however, is not surgically connected, nor was it ever "attached" to her. Instead, the baby is being produced by the mother's own body by the natural process of reproduction.
A child is not an invader, though, a parasite living off his mother. A mother's womb is the baby's natural environment. Eileen McDonagh wants us to believe that the child growing inside of a woman is trespassing. One trespasses when he's not in his rightful place, but a baby developing in the womb belongs there.
In the violinist illustration, the woman might be justified withholding life-giving treatment from the musician under these circumstances. Abortion, though, is not merely withholding treatment. It is actively taking another human being's life through poisoning or dismemberment. A more accurate parallel with abortion would be to crush the violinist or cut him into pieces before unplugging him.
Care to elaborate?...or Is that all you got?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?