Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm not offended by you or your views, since I place little value on the latter.I'm not offended by you or your views, since I place little value on the latter. I do recommend that you stop ignoring facts. That might allow coherence to enter your posts.
We're not taking about child abuse or the Pope, either. We are talking about your assertion that acceptance of a naturalistic explanation for a physical phenomenon is a denial of God.Actually there are about 2.2 billion Christians of which I am one. However I am not one that ignores abuse as some seem to be able to do.
That aside do you believe that the USA should abandon capitalism as the Pope said that Capitalism has failed the World? Because the only other choices are socialism or communism?
Pope: Market capitalism has failed in pandemic, needs reform (apnews.com)
I do believe the first scientist came out places like Egypt, Greece, etc.. all pagan peoples
That idea is called panspermia and has been talked about since the early 19th century.LOL there are now scientist that babble that life came to Earth on an asteroid, they say this because they can not accept that life came to the Earth by a process unknown to man that is called God.
We still have much to discover - so what?You were correct in the first sentence and could have stopped there. The implication of epigenetics is that there is a mechanism that allows a parent to communicate the past thru a genetic pathway that tosses random mutation to the curb as the only way for change as this is clearly not random. When this is figured out we will see an entire new layer of info in the genetic code. Which may change many ideas
I agree but not all seem to be sticking to the thread concept. Actually a new theory is extrapolating that gravitational expansion is speeding because of an influence that comes from outside of our universe as the closer a galaxy comes to this point the stronger the attraction becomes. So this is also just another example of science creating supernatural and unfounded ideas to explain away observations. Why does this type of assertation not bother you however God does?We're not taking about child abuse or the Pope, either. We are talking about your assertion that acceptance of a naturalistic explanation for a physical phenomenon is a denial of God.
LOL the FBI said that once and also got educated.That idea is called panspermia and has been talked about since the early 19th century.
No offence intended, but you do seem remarkably ill-informed about the subjects you pick to post on.
If you've not yet encountered the concept of higher education, you might find it informative...And your degree included information that you "learnt"
Interesting
Smokie, welcome aboard the ship ‘Evolutionist Playbook’ (Phase 1 – discredit; Phase 2 – attack; Phase 3 – scramble the entire conversation). Congratulations, you’ve made it to phase 3, most don’t get past phase 2.I agree but not all seem to be sticking to the thread concept.
No offence intended, but you do seem remarkably ill-informed about the subjects you pick to post on.
Again with the lie. God does not bother me. Given your behavior here, perhaps it should bother you.I agree but not all seem to be sticking to the thread concept. Actually a new theory is extrapolating that gravitational expansion is speeding because of an influence that comes from outside of our universe as the closer a galaxy comes to this point the stronger the attraction becomes. So this is also just another example of science creating supernatural and unfounded ideas to explain away observations. Why does this type of assertation not bother you however God does?
Smokie, welcome aboard the ship ‘Evolutionist Playbook’ (Phase 1 – discredit; Phase 2 – attack; Phase 3 – scramble the entire conversation). Congratulations, you’ve made it to phase 3, most don’t get past phase 2.
Yawn indeedLOL the FBI said that once and also got educated.
Yawn
Why is what someone chooses to call an unfounded babble important? and the new theory is that the universe is really a computer simulation by the way, so there is no real life according to Tyson
LOL, actually I am implying that learnt is not a word in the English language.If you've not yet encountered the concept of higher education, you might find it informative...
But if you're implying that such teaching is dogmatic, you'd be wrong.
As far as I am concerned there is only one phase: expose, denounce, and if necessary report to the moderators the lie that a natural explanation for a physical phenomenon denies divine causality.Smokie, welcome aboard the ship ‘Evolutionist Playbook’ (Phase 1 – discredit; Phase 2 – attack; Phase 3 – scramble the entire conversation). Congratulations, you’ve made it to phase 3, most don’t get past phase 2.
So Tysons theory that the universe is really a computer program bugs you. Makes me ROTFALMFAO, but I do understand your frustrationYawn indeed
Wake me when you have something other than mangled misunderstanding to offer.
But, questioning the interpretation of a natural explanation for physical phenomenon isn't a lie.As far as I am concerned there is only one phase: expose, denounce, and if necessary report to the moderators the lie that a natural explanation for a physical phenomenon denies divine causality.
Do you mean for indoctrination, or to develop original thought on the subject?Have you undertaken any post-secondary education? Have you ever studied at any scientific subjects (even just a single class) at the post-secondary level?
Do you mean for indoctrination, or to develop original thought on the subject?
Well, it wasn't originally addressed to me, so I should deflect I guess.I mean exactly what is worded in the original question. Have they ever studied anything (especially any science classes) at the post-secondary level?
Again with the lie.
Which avoids the issue nicely. The assertion being made in this forum is that a natural explanation for a physical phenomenon denies divine causality. Questioning whether a given natural explanation is adequate to explain the phenomenon is a different issue altogether.But, questioning the interpretation of a natural explanation for physical phenomenon isn't a lie.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?