What science? Science encompasses a wide field of studies. What internet atheists tend to do is justify their inferior creation myths by attaching them onto the prestige of operational sciences which drives technology and does not survive on grant money. The provided points were made in the parts you ignored.
What Science? Every legitimate field that does not try to mix mythology into its process, and yes I'm talking about the daycare centre more commonly known as the Discovery Institute where Theist play pretend 'scientist'. And what do you mean by internet Atheist? Are they any different from Atheist that are not found on the internet? And you have it mixed up there buddy, its creationist that tries desperately to justify their creation myths by coming up with nonsensical pseudo crap like ID, get your facts straight.
So is evolution and all life from nonlife. Unless you can show how the modern advances would have been impossible (Penicillin and double helix for example) absent an extensive knowledge of evolution and abiogenesis (life from nonlife). As it is it has no more relevance then an extensive knowledge of ancient Egyptian economics applies to modern economics.
Here, have a read
Evolutionary medicine - Wikipedia
Why evolution matters — evolution.ws
Understanding evolution is important
Relevance of evolution: medicine
How is Darwinian medicine useful?
Evolution in Medicine
Of what value is evolutionary biology in medicine?
ActionBioscience - promoting bioscience literacy
Special feature on evolution and genetics in medicine | Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences
SCIENCE, DO YOU SPEAK IT?
Again which part of 'the bible is irrelevant to the progress of science' do you not understand? Besides looney bins like Michael Behe, do you know of any real scientist that goes,....hmmmmm, whats does the bible say about evolution? Or WWJD regarding the theory of gravity? If any legit scientist attempted to do that, they can kiss their career goodbye. So really what has that load of random words you mention got to do with my statement the "THE BIBLE IS IRRELEVANT TO THE PROGRESS OF SCIENCE?"
Last edited:
Upvote
0