• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

Born again morality as opposed to the worlds morality.

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
15,444
3,865
✟374,128.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I have been think about this comparison as I have transformed under Christ. God says He is the potter and we are the clay. As born again Christians we have a new nature and sin cannot live in us anymore. We are constantly being rebuked and handing over to God our sinful desires and own will in an ongoing transformastion that gets us closer and closer to being Christlike.

How does this comapred with the worlds ideologies on morality. Is this more like the old law of Moses. No matter what system or basis that is used it will always be a law or a norm that people must uphold but be forever falling short. Thus sin is never overcome and what may seem moral or good works is in the end a system doomed to fail according to Christs teachings.

For it is not the law that makes us justified but Christ who lives in us which transforms our sinful nature to want to obey God by nature not by good works.
There's no fear in love (1 John 4:18). Love is the norm by which we must act, and by which we'll be judged. And that's a very, very good and desevering and worthwhile norm- and obligation. Love overcomes sin, love is holiness, love is the image of God that we're to be transformed into.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: stevevw
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,449
1,623
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟301,737.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There's no fear in love (1 John 4:18). Love is the norm by which we must act, and by which we'll be judged. And that's a very, very good and desevering and worthwhile norm- and obligation. Love overcomes sin, love is holiness, love is the image of God that we're to be transformed into.
I would also say love is sacrificial which people forget. It requires we put others on the same level and even above us or putting aside our own ambitions for God. But it can also mean rebuking a brother in love if they sin. This is trrue love in that you are caring to save their soul.

Also remembering that the 'love' the world talks about can cover sin in a different way. It is love grounded in Christ as opposed to this world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fhansen
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,558
4,410
63
Southern California
✟57,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
I have been think about this comparison as I have transformed under Christ. God says He is the potter and we are the clay. As born again Christians we have a new nature and sin cannot live in us anymore.
First, I hope that I am in the right place, that this is a debate forum that allows for non-Christians. If I'm in the wrong place, please forgive and simply move my post. Thanks.

stevevw, I'm a little confused by your above remark "sin cannot live in us anymore." Are you saying Christians never sin? Because I have to be real honest with you. Even though the Christians I have known have been very good people, they certainly do sin.
How does this comapred with the worlds ideologies on morality. Is this more like the old law of Moses.
This is not a plug to change your mind. I'm fine with you believing as you wish. However, since you bring up the Law of Moses, this is how Rabbi Hillel (who lived about 30 years before Jesus) sums it up: "What is hateful to you, don't do to others. This is the WHOLE Torah. All the rest is commentary. Now go study." All the laws of the Torah can be grouped into two categories: "Love God with all your heart, soul, and strength," and "love your neighbor as yourself."
No matter what system or basis that is used it will always be a law or a norm that people must uphold but be forever falling short.
I realize that for you, nothing short of perfection is good enough. But it's different for me. It's not about being perfect. It's about aspiring to be perfect. It's about REPENTING when you stumble. Proverbs 24:16 "For a righteous man may fall seven times And rise again, But the wicked shall fall by calamity."

to want to obey God by nature not by good works.
This is confusing to me too. To obey God means to do good works.

Anyhow, if you disagree, I'm fine with that. There will always be disagreement between humans as long as we have separate brains. :)
 
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,558
4,410
63
Southern California
✟57,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
The born again Christian has a different [SET] of moral values (or elements) than does the majority of non-Christian moralists,
I hope I am in the right forum. I'm assuming this is the debate forum in which non-Christians are allowed?

Nice to meet you, Philo. Could you give me several examples of morals Christians have that non-Christians don't share? I don't mean ALL non-Christians. We are a very diverse group. I mean, are there any morals that are UNIQUE to Christians?
Conversely, however, we might then see that the Christian says, "I don't believe that sleeping around before marriage is moral," and thereby make the effort in daily life to avoid doing so, but the non-Christian insists that it's A-OK and racks up a body count
I know you mean well, but you are way overgeneralizing. I can assure you, I've dated many Christian men, and all of them but one have pushed me for sex. Conversely, I'm NOT a Christian, and I don't sleep around. I'm divorced, and although I think men are wonderful, I'm voluntarily celibate.

I think it is very important to resist the human instinct to group people into "us" and "them" and see "us" being much better than "them."
 
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,558
4,410
63
Southern California
✟57,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
I don't think what Paul is talking about is dogma. Its an attempt to explain the battle between two natures involved in what Paul describes as the flesh nature which is our desires and instincts and our spiritual nature in Christ.


Secular ideology believes that our instincts and desires are natural and good.
Hmmmm, that's not what I've found among my secular friends. It's more like they see our instincts as NEUTRAL, that these instincts become "good" only when we use them in ways that are helpful, and they become "bad" when they harm others.
Ok but you just said that Cathologism and Christianity are the same thing.
Pardon me for kind of butting into a Christian versus Christian argument, but to those of us on the outside, it seems that anyone who believes Jesus is the Messiah who died for your sins is a Christian. Thus, Protestants (Baptists, Methodists, Non-denominational, etc.), Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Nestorians, etc. are all just different Christian groups.
Left me with Catholic guilt.
LOL yeah. I joke with my Catholic friends about which group has the most guilt complex, Catholics or Jews? :)
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,449
1,623
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟301,737.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
First, I hope that I am in the right place, that this is a debate forum that allows for non-Christians. If I'm in the wrong place, please forgive and simply move my post. Thanks.
Your in the right place and your welcome.
stevevw, I'm a little confused by your above remark "sin cannot live in us anymore." Are you saying Christians never sin? Because I have to be real honest with you. Even though the Christians I have known have been very good people, they certainly do sin.
It does not mean Christians do not sin as we are all sinners and to say that sin is not in us is to lie. This means that by our new nature in Christ sin becomes like an inflection in our bodies that we want to get out. Like a thorn is our side that we keep having to get out.

Therefore as we are transformed in Christ and God molds us into being more Christlike. That means we cannot live in or practice sin. We may occassionally sin but we do not practice that sin. When we are convicted by the spirit of GOd we take that sin and hand it to God and we do not repeat it as practicing that way of life. Then we become more Christlike. We may be convicted again and we rid ourselves again and again and again always striving towards Christ.

Anyone who is practicing sin is not of Christ. If a CHristian is blatantly living in sin then the spirit of God is not in them no matter what they say.
This is not a plug to change your mind. I'm fine with you believing as you wish. However, since you bring up the Law of Moses, this is how Rabbi Hillel (who lived about 30 years before Jesus) sums it up: "What is hateful to you, don't do to others. This is the WHOLE Torah. All the rest is commentary. Now go study." All the laws of the Torah can be grouped into two categories: "Love God with all your heart, soul, and strength," and "love your neighbor as yourself."
Yes and Christ also states this. But that does not do away with the law. Its just telling us that this sums up what the law is really about. Just living with others makes life moral. Without people there is no morality.

So a big part of morality involves how we treat others. The other part is about first loving God the moral lawgiver to begin with rather than other gods. Only Yahwah is the one true God and source of life and love.
I realize that for you, nothing short of perfection is good enough. But it's different for me. It's not about being perfect. It's about aspiring to be perfect. It's about REPENTING when you stumble. Proverbs 24:16 "For a righteous man may fall seven times And rise again, But the wicked shall fall by calamity."
Yes I agree.
This is confusing to me too. To obey God means to do good works.
Yes the fruits of the spirit.
Anyhow, if you disagree, I'm fine with that. There will always be disagreement between humans as long as we have separate brains. :)
No I don't disagree. You said it well. :oldthumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,449
1,623
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟301,737.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hmmmm, that's not what I've found among my secular friends. It's more like they see our instincts as NEUTRAL, that these instincts become "good" only when we use them in ways that are helpful, and they become "bad" when they harm others.
I guess it depends on the group and even non Christians can have Christian like belief. For example the idea that companionship and sex is a natural human desire and instinct.

I think the secular norm is that it should not be restricted to marriage or one relationship. That you may have several before you settle down. Or that even having sex is a need that should be catered for as a basic right. Many welfare States allocate funds that allow those who are not able to have relationships such as the disabled with sex services as part of their holistic approach to human wellbeing and health.

But to the Christ we are called to follow a higher standard that puts our flesh desires and instinct second if not completely put aside if we are to lead a celebrate life before or without marriage. Thats a pretty big ask in secular norms. In fact some would say its absuing human rights.

I think of all the great men of the bible who put God first even if it meant going without the basic human needs like food and shelter. Suffering physically rather than being comfortable and pleasured. THis is the higher calling of Christians in exampling Christ.
Pardon me for kind of butting into a Christian versus Christian argument, but to those of us on the outside, it seems that anyone who believes Jesus is the Messiah who died for your sins is a Christian. Thus, Protestants (Baptists, Methodists, Non-denominational, etc.), Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Nestorians, etc. are all just different Christian groups.
Yes that is the gospel and it can be heard on the streets, in the hospitals, in war or a chance encounter that God is leading us to. But this is different to Gods church the institution that holds His congregation. They have to be in unity. There is not many different churches or interpretations of Gods truth. There is only one.

Thats not saying this one is right or that one is wrong. We get the teachings for the church from the disciples of the early church who instruct us in how we should organise ourselves in ministry.

For any organisation say like McDonalds though they have some independence they all work to the MacDonalds system. None go off and start selling opposing burgers or create their own version of the Big Mac lol. They all need to conform to the same reciept and fundemental structure.
LOL yeah. I joke with my Catholic friends about which group has the most guilt complex, Catholics or Jews? :)
Theres no one like the Catholics for spreading Catholic guilt.
 
Upvote 0

Jermayn

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2019
1,220
651
Northwest Florida
✟147,354.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have been think about this comparison as I have transformed under Christ. God says He is the potter and we are the clay. As born again Christians we have a new nature and sin cannot live in us anymore. We are constantly being rebuked and handing over to God our sinful desires and own will in an ongoing transformastion that gets us closer and closer to being Christlike.

How does this comapred with the worlds ideologies on morality. Is this more like the old law of Moses. No matter what system or basis that is used it will always be a law or a norm that people must uphold but be forever falling short. Thus sin is never overcome and what may seem moral or good works is in the end a system doomed to fail according to Christs teachings.

For it is not the law that makes us justified but Christ who lives in us which transforms our sinful nature to want to obey God by nature not by good works.
Great question. I would say that the worlds ideologies on morality do not offer internal transformation but rely on external moral pressure. People follow secular laws because they don't want to go to jail, while we follow God's commands because we are being transformed into Christs likeness. Secular laws are also more about the mutual protection of society.
 
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,449
1,623
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟301,737.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Great question. I would say that the worlds ideologies on morality do not offer internal transformation but rely on external moral pressure. People follow secular laws because they don't want to go to jail, while we follow God's commands because we are being transformed into Christs likeness. Secular laws are also more about the mutual protection of society.
I do think there is a degree of transdormation of mind and heart with ideas in the world about life and meaning and happiness. Look at the mystical religions where true enlightenment comes with a transformation from one of temporal concerns to one of being one with the universe. Which is bacially a fundemental aspect of all beliefs in being situated beyond the material world.

But maybe its more like you say, a state that one puts oneself into rather than being transformed from something working on you from the spirit of God. If there is only one God and one Christ and Holy Spirit then only this can truely act on you and transform a persons heart and mind frpm a power greater than themselves. Greater than all powers.

So these maybe a mixtureof different kinds oif spirits as there are spirits besides the holy spirit. Or they maybe self created states or believed states or a form of mind control in putting oneself in that state. Or maybe feelings which can be a powerful force in motivating people. Or even a principle itself or another human who becomes like a Guru or salemen who convinces people that they have the answers to life.

But they are all human made ideas about how to live the perfect life based on our own efforts or on another humans ability which will always be fallible.
 
Upvote 0

Discussion

Ethereal
Apr 19, 2025
49
8
16
London
✟1,351.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If there is only one God and one Christ and Holy Spirit then only this can truely act on you and transform a persons heart and mind frpm a power greater than themselves. Greater than all powers.

This claim assumes the truth of a specific religious worldview, but from a sceptical atheist perspective, there's no evidence to support the idea that only the Christian God can cause real transformation. People from all sorts of traditions - Buddhist monks, Sufi mystics, secular philosophers, and even people in nature or through art - report life-changing, transcendent experiences. If these transformations occur without reference to Christ or the Holy Spirit, it suggests that such changes are not proof of one divine truth, but rather expressions of the human brain’s capacity for deep emotional and psychological shifts. These experiences may feel external or divine, but they are more plausibly the result of internal cognitive processes.



They maybe self created states or believed states or a form of mind control in putting oneself in that state.

This casts doubt on non-Christian spiritual experiences, suggesting they may be delusional or self-imposed. But this scepticism can - and should (unless you have a demosterable symmetry breaker) - be extended to Christian experiences as well. The emotional intensity of being “filled with the Holy Spirit,” speaking in tongues, or receiving personal revelations mirrors the mystical states found in other religions. The universality of such experiences across contradictory belief systems indicates that they are not unique proofs of divine truth, but likely stem from common neurological or psychological mechanisms. Just because a state feels powerful or sacred doesn't mean it's evidence of a supernatural source - Christian or otherwise.

Similar spiritual experiences occur across all religions, often contradicting each other. This strongly suggests they're psychological, not divine. It's the brain, not a god. Apologies for butting in on your conversation, I hope you find my points interesting.

Have a good day,
Luca
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Unscrewing Romans 1:32
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,069
11,215
56
Space Mountain!
✟1,319,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I hope I am in the right forum. I'm assuming this is the debate forum in which non-Christians are allowed?

Nice to meet you, Philo. Could you give me several examples of morals Christians have that non-Christians don't share? I don't mean ALL non-Christians. We are a very diverse group. I mean, are there any morals that are UNIQUE to Christians?
Nice to me you as well, Open Heart. I think you've arrived at the correct destination for discussion---I say 'discussion' because from an academic viewpoint, that is what I prefer over what other's define as 'debate.'

Yes, non-Christians are a very diverse group and believe me when I say I'm well aware of this since multi-culturalism was a large part of my studies in the past. As to your question, "are there unique moral to Christians?" I wouldn't say there many unique elements in the set of Christian ethical [SETS] which are never shared with those in other ethical or religious viewpoints. But I would assert that there is a general set of moral traits that one needs to recognize and adhere to in order to claim the minimum of putting in the effort to be a bona-fide Christian. One of those moral traits in a Christian Ethic would be the effort to "love even one's enemies." ... this is the first element of the Christian [set] that I will cite, mainly because it is difficult to do and I've spoken to a number of non-Christians who have suggested that despite their penchant for 'human right,' they will absolutely not feel obligated to do as Jesus has commanded His disciples. And it is difficult, I think we can all admit. If we were Ukrainian, could we attempt to "love our Russian neighbor"? If we were Muslim, could we attempt to love our Jewish neighbor? If we are a traditional Christian, can we attempt to "love our diverse, at times disagreeable and antagonistic, polyamorous, even Communistic neighbors"?

These minimal elements within the Christian [SET] of morals isn't given by the early Church (or Jesus) as "optional." We could cite other moral elements which should be in the Christian set as well. But at the moment, I'll let you respond to what I've initially suggested here, if that is what you wish to do.
I know you mean well, but you are way overgeneralizing. I can assure you, I've dated many Christian men, and all of them but one have pushed me for sex. Conversely, I'm NOT a Christian, and I don't sleep around. I'm divorced, and although I think men are wonderful, I'm voluntarily celibate.
My apologies if it sounds like I'm generalizing. It might seem that way if you're not familiar with all I've written on CF over the years. As for Christian men, they shouldn't be pushing you for sex and it's not 'ok' if they do, even if it is the case we live in a society that has 'consumerized' the sexual response among men, encouraging it and inflaming it in profligate ways.
I think it is very important to resist the human instinct to group people into "us" and "them" and see "us" being much better than "them."

I wholeheartedly agree; at the same time, there are analytically qualifiable nuances that do differentiate people ethically, and if Christianity is true in some substantial way, those differences do at times divide people into groups that are identifiable. As a beginning point for studying these differences, I'd recommend the book, "Ethics: An Introduction to Theories and Problems," by William S. Sahakian (1974). There are many other similar sources/books I can also bring to the table if you wish, but I think this is enough for now.

Ethics and Morality is one of the fields I've studied as a part of my Philosophical outlook (in my BA degree), so I'm open to further conversation if you want.

Have a blessed day.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,558
4,410
63
Southern California
✟57,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
One of those moral traits in a Christian Ethic would be the effort to "love even one's enemies." ...
I think it all boils down to Leviticus 19:18 וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ V'ahavta l'reiacha kamocha "Love your neighbor as yourself." The question is, who is my neighbor. Rei’a is broader than just someone who lives next door. I wont' lie to you. There are some Jewish Rabbis who say that this verse is referring to the Jewish people. But there are also Rabbis who say that this refers to all of humanity. Their argument is based on the fact that this word, Rei'a, is used elsewhere in the Torah where it clearly is NOT referring to the Israelites.

For example, Exodus 11:2 דַּבֶּר־נָא בְּאָזְנֵי הָעָם וְיִשְׁאֲלוּ אִישׁ מֵאֵת רֵעֵהוּ..."Let every man ask from his neighbor (rei'eihu)... silver and gold" Here, the "neighbors" are Egyptians--clearly non-Israelites. So rei’a must include non-Jews.

Ramban (Nachmanides) explains that while the Torah may have begun with obligations to one’s own community, the ethical ideals are meant to grow into universalism.

Now we can move to discuss what "love" means. It doesn't not mean unconditional approval of everything the other does. It means wanting what is in their best interest. I'm sure you have heard the term "tough love." Holding our enemies accountable for the harm they do is not hatred. It is treating them with dignity owed every human being by holding them responsible for their wrong.
My apologies if it sounds like I'm generalizing. It might seem that way if you're not familiar with all I've written on CF over the years.
Not to worry. We are both getting to know each other.

I also tend to be misunderstood. My ideas are always highly nuanced. For the sake of clarity and easy reading on a forum, I simplify. But in doing so, the complexity of what I really think is lost. Someone can read one post here, and another post there, and scratch their head because I seem to be contradicting myself, when in actuality, each post is a piece of a much larger puzzle.
Ethics and Morality is one of the fields I've studied as a part of my Philosophical outlook (in my BA degree), so I'm open to further conversation if you want.
I think that's wonderful!

My own degree is in Liberal Studies (a "liberal" dose of all subjects lol) because when I look out on the world, I see how everything is interconnected with everything else.

But I have to admit, I do have a particular fondness for Ethics, Religion, and Psychology. I've only ever taken one philosophy course (Logic and Critical Thinking) so my credentials don't come from study, and in some ways you will leave me in the dust LOL. My credentials come from my intense introspection, turning ethical issues over and over again in my mind.
Have a blessed day.
And you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,558
4,410
63
Southern California
✟57,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
I guess it depends on the group and even non Christians can have Christian like belief. For example the idea that companionship and sex is a natural human desire and instinct.
Good example. The desire for sex is an instinct. When part of a committed relationship (marriage) it is sacred and wonderful. It only becomes "bad" when done at the wrong time, or the wrong place, or in the wrong way, or with the wrong person.
I think the secular norm is that it should not be restricted to marriage or one relationship. That you may have several before you settle down.
I agree that this is regrettable. The problem here is not that society in general thinks it's okay to cause harm. The problem is that society is not sufficiently sensitive to the harm that flitting around sexually does. People don't want to see how a long succession of partners creates the kind of instability that emotionally harms children. They don't want to face how frequent broken hearts lead to jadedness. Casual sex leaves a lot of damage in its wake.
Or that even having sex is a need that should be catered for as a basic right.
Pfft. The few people who actually say that are simply morons. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to look around and see that many people who want sex don't get sex. Maybe they are extraordinarily ugly. Maybe they are so socially awkward that they have difficulty forming relationships. Maybe they have a serious disability that interferes. You get the idea. No one has a "right" to sex.
Many welfare States allocate funds that allow those who are not able to have relationships such as the disabled with sex services as part of their holistic approach to human wellbeing and health.
You must be talking about somewhere outside the US.
But to the Christ we are called to follow a higher standard that puts our flesh desires and instinct second if not completely put aside if we are to lead a celebrate life before or without marriage.
I don't see how that is any different than what Judaism asks. Or Islam. Or even ethical atheism.

There is only one God, and he is not only the God of Israel, but the God of all the earth. When it comes to basic morals, "Love your neighbor as yourself," his command is universal. It is not limited to Christians
Theres no one like the Catholics for spreading Catholic guilt.
You've clearly never had to deal with a Jewish mother. :)

BTW, this is totally off topic, but are we allowed to paste links to videos or websites?
 
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,558
4,410
63
Southern California
✟57,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Therefore as we are transformed in Christ and God molds us into being more Christlike. That means we cannot live in or practice sin. We may occassionally sin but we do not practice that sin. When we are convicted by the spirit of GOd we take that sin and hand it to God and we do not repeat it as practicing that way of life. Then we become more Christlike. We may be convicted again and we rid ourselves again and again and again always striving towards Christ.
I'm wondering how you would test this to see if it were true. What are some things I can see with my own eyes that would differentiate Christians from non-Christians, visible, tangible things that would prove that "receiving Jesus into your heart" leads to some sort of transformation, making you different from everyone else?

Because I have to confess, when I look at Christians, a nice as they are, I don't find them to be at all different from anyone else. You have the good, the bad, and the ugly, just as with any other groups. There is absolutely nothing that I can see with my own eyes that makes you guys as a group different from any other religious group. And if this internal transformation that you claim doesn't translate into any observable difference? Then it seems pretty worthless to me.

But I'll suspend my thought temporarily while I consider your response.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
6,550
3,348
82
Goldsboro NC
✟238,710.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
BTW, this is totally off topic, but are we allowed to paste links to videos or websites?
Absolutely. It is, in fact, encouraged as a way of backing up your assertions with actual evidence. On the other hand, ust posting the link will not do without some commentary of your own explaining how it supports your argument.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
6,550
3,348
82
Goldsboro NC
✟238,710.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I'm wondering how you would test this to see if it were true. What are some things I can see with my own eyes that would differentiate Christians from non-Christians, visible, tangible things that would prove that "receiving Jesus into your heart" leads to some sort of transformation, making you different from everyone else?

Because I have to confess, when I look at Christians, a nice as they are, I don't find them to be at all different from anyone else. You have the good, the bad, and the ugly, just as with any other groups. There is absolutely nothing that I can see with my own eyes that makes you guys as a group different from any other religious group. And if this internal transformation that you claim doesn't translate into any observable difference? Then it seems pretty worthless to me.

But I'll suspend my thought temporarily while I consider your response.
Keep in mind that Steve is not arguing Christian theology as such--a subject about which he knows little or nothing. He is arguing the innate superiority of Western Anglo-Protestant culture, and why right-wing Evangelical Protestant sexual morality should be imposed by law on the non-Christian citizens of a secular state.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Unscrewing Romans 1:32
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,069
11,215
56
Space Mountain!
✟1,319,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I think it all boils down to Leviticus 19:18 וְאָהַבְתָּ לְרֵעֲךָ כָּמוֹךָ V'ahavta l'reiacha kamocha "Love your neighbor as yourself." The question is, who is my neighbor. Rei’a is broader than just someone who lives next door. I wont' lie to you. There are some Jewish Rabbis who say that this verse is referring to the Jewish people. But there are also Rabbis who say that this refers to all of humanity. Their argument is based on the fact that this word, Rei'a, is used elsewhere in the Torah where it clearly is NOT referring to the Israelites.

For example, Exodus 11:2 דַּבֶּר־נָא בְּאָזְנֵי הָעָם וְיִשְׁאֲלוּ אִישׁ מֵאֵת רֵעֵהוּ..."Let every man ask from his neighbor (rei'eihu)... silver and gold" Here, the "neighbors" are Egyptians--clearly non-Israelites. So rei’a must include non-Jews.

Ramban (Nachmanides) explains that while the Torah may have begun with obligations to one’s own community, the ethical ideals are meant to grow into universalism.

Now we can move to discuss what "love" means. It doesn't not mean unconditional approval of everything the other does. It means wanting what is in their best interest. I'm sure you have heard the term "tough love." Holding our enemies accountable for the harm they do is not hatred. It is treating them with dignity owed every human being by holding them responsible for their wrong.
Yes, I think I generally empathize with what you're sharing here and reflecting upon from various Jewish rabbis.

However, Christians will usually refer to the specific teachings of the New Testament writers since those writers express what they believe is their own report about what Jesus of Nazareth taught. So, in the case of "loving even one's enemies," there are implied nuances in the texts that go beyond what the Jewish rabbis might be teaching in various forms of Judaism. I'm not saying that Jewish people never have willingness to be generous and go extra miles for other people. I'm sure that some of them, like some Gentiles, may very well do so. But, I'm also essentially aware of the Jewish perspectives, historically and politically considered, such as would be seen in the following works as but a few examples I can provide:
Rabbi Milton Steinberg - Basic Judaism
Stuart E. Rosenberg - The Christian Problem
Michael Goldberg - Jews and Christians, Getting Our Stories Straight
Paul J. Kirsch - We Christians and Jews
Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein - What Christians Should Know About Jews and Judaism


One brief example is seen in Jesus' admonition to His disciples that "if someone forces you to go one mile [such as the Romans would conscript Jewish civilians to do from time to time back in the 1st century], ... go with them TWO miles." Not many people are willing to follow through and attempt such supererogation today by going a second mile, or maybe a third one, especially among those of us living in a post-Revolutionary Age who are told that "revolting against apparent injustice" is fully justified where any individual perception of human rights violations is present.

Likewise, another often quoted bit of New Testament regarding how Christians see the nature of "love"----and whether or not Christians today actually live up to the standard placed before them nearly 2,000 years ago----is seen in Paul's teaching in 1 Corinthians 13:1-8, with particular emphasis placed on the use of verses 4 to 8.
Not to worry. We are both getting to know each other.

I also tend to be misunderstood. My ideas are always highly nuanced. For the sake of clarity and easy reading on a forum, I simplify. But in doing so, the complexity of what I really think is lost. Someone can read one post here, and another post there, and scratch their head because I seem to be contradicting myself, when in actuality, each post is a piece of a much larger puzzle.
Don't worry about it. I understand you.
I think that's wonderful!

My own degree is in Liberal Studies (a "liberal" dose of all subjects lol) because when I look out on the world, I see how everything is interconnected with everything else.
And I value your academic work you've done, and it sounds like you and I have some similarity in our respective research approaches.
But I have to admit, I do have a particular fondness for Ethics, Religion, and Psychology. I've only ever taken one philosophy course (Logic and Critical Thinking) so my credentials don't come from study, and in some ways you will leave me in the dust LOL. My credentials come from my intense introspection, turning ethical issues over and over again in my mind.
I'm sure you have some interesting points to make, then, being that you're an informed reflector. :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
15,444
3,865
✟374,128.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I have been think about this comparison as I have transformed under Christ. God says He is the potter and we are the clay. As born again Christians we have a new nature and sin cannot live in us anymore. We are constantly being rebuked and handing over to God our sinful desires and own will in an ongoing transformastion that gets us closer and closer to being Christlike.

How does this comapred with the worlds ideologies on morality. Is this more like the old law of Moses. No matter what system or basis that is used it will always be a law or a norm that people must uphold but be forever falling short. Thus sin is never overcome and what may seem moral or good works is in the end a system doomed to fail according to Christs teachings.

For it is not the law that makes us justified but Christ who lives in us which transforms our sinful nature to want to obey God by nature not by good works.
The basis of Christianity is love, anchored in the God-who-is-love and who demonstrated that love in no uncertain terms in human flesh. And love, simply, does not murder, does not commit adultery, steal, harm ones neighbor, offend God, etc. "Love fulfills the law", IOW.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: stevevw
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
15,449
1,623
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟301,737.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The basis of Christianity is love, anchored in the God-who-is-love and who demonstrated that love in no uncertain terms in human flesh. And love, simply, does not murder, does not commit adultery, steal, harm ones neighbor, offend God, etc. "Love fulfills the law", IOW.
Yes this relates to
1 Corinthians 13:4-8
Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.

Thats telling as knowledge itself will pass away. So all the rationalisations about what is right or wrong will never explain morality but only love in Christ which will go on beyond this world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,558
4,410
63
Southern California
✟57,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
However, Christians will usually refer to the specific teachings of the New Testament writers since those writers express what they believe is their own report about what Jesus of Nazareth taught.
I would expect nothing less. :)
Rabbi Milton Steinberg - Basic Judaism
Stuart E. Rosenberg - The Christian Problem
Michael Goldberg - Jews and Christians, Getting Our Stories Straight
Paul J. Kirsch - We Christians and Jews
Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein - What Christians Should Know About Jews and Judaism
I'm deeply, deeply appreciative of the fact that you have taken the time to read all these books. I too have read a great deal about other religions, including Christianity. I believe with all my heart that being a better neighbor begins with listening to others and understanding them.
One brief example is seen in Jesus' admonition to His disciples that "if someone forces you to go one mile [such as the Romans would conscript Jewish civilians to do from time to time back in the 1st century], ... go with them TWO miles." Not many people are willing to follow through and attempt such supererogation today by going a second mile, or maybe a third one, especially among those of us living in a post-Revolutionary Age who are told that "revolting against apparent injustice" is fully justified where any individual perception of human rights violations is present.
Do you think Jesus really meant this literally? When I read the gospels, I thought it striking just how often Jesus employed hyperbole to make a point.
 
Upvote 0