Man, it must be nice to be Dr. Dobson and have a convenient scapegoat handy to blame for all societal errors! Lucky bum!
Well, I do support abstinence programs, but I think we need to be realistic - sex ed programs, which last several weeks or so for an hour a day - are hardly going to combat the social messages kids are receiving through television, magazines, friends, etc. Living in a world in which premarital sex is the norm, a child is not going to respond well to a few lectures. Unless Focus on the Family is planning to pay for abstinence programs lasting 4-6 hours a day from age 8-21, I think they will have to rethink this strategy. Yes, abstinence is a wise choice, and if you can convince kids of that, good. But you can't just lecture or point fingers, you need to teach them why, and about the consequences, and about self-respect...you've got to combat the messages they receive that say women are sex objects, that dating involves sex, that only prudes and weirdos abstain. For this reason I think you really have to teach about protection, it's irresponsible to loose these kids on the world with no idea of how to protect themselves.
In a perfect world they would all have supportive parents and friends who encourage abstinence, but that isn't the case. Some kids, despite abstinence programs, despite lectures and ultimatums or growing up in a Christian house, will decide to have sex. They need to know how to best prevent stds and pregnancy.
Hmmm...blaming it on pagans? Are they referring to actual pagans (Druids, Kemetics and whatnot?) or just secular people and casual Christians, which make up a much larger portion of our population? What exactly has FotF discovered about Pagan practices to make them so suspicious? I think the real problem is society - the Christian majority seems to have faltered in this country, and although 80% of people here claim belief they have permitted these messages about mandatory sex to come through. Of course, no Christian radio show is going to broadcast that information.
It also says that pregnancy out of wedlock statistics have increased because pregnancy out of wedlock doesn't carry the "disgrace" it used to.
I see nothing wrong with this. Does FotF believe it was better when "*******" children were ostrasized, teased and demeaned for something they couldn't help?