Once while playing blackjack, I was dealt a pair of aces in a row. On both hands, I split the aces and was dealt a face card on each ace resulting in four blackjacks two at a time.There were multiple players at the table so calculating the odds would require a bit of time and memory. Suffice it to say, the odds of this happening are quite low. Now obviously before this, the dealer shuffled the cards and had dealt out several hands before this occurred. If we were to intricately examine the dealer shuffling and were able to count the cards as they came out we could easily see the process that led to my two lucky hands.
The above anecdote was accomplished through natural means. The dealer shuffled, cards were dealt, I got my hands.
Is there any reason to include an element of design in this scenario? In my opinion, no. It is a superfluous element since we already know or could possibly know the process of how the hands came about.
If you think that design is required in any of this, explain why.
If you don't understand blackjack, then don't even try to explain anything.
The above anecdote was accomplished through natural means. The dealer shuffled, cards were dealt, I got my hands.
Is there any reason to include an element of design in this scenario? In my opinion, no. It is a superfluous element since we already know or could possibly know the process of how the hands came about.
If you think that design is required in any of this, explain why.
If you don't understand blackjack, then don't even try to explain anything.
