Biden campaign received massive help

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,920
14,014
Broken Arrow, OK
✟702,471.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You mean like a typical campaign commercial? Even if they did somehow influence the election (which is unlikely), it's perfectly fine for them to do that. I mean, if they were making false statements, that's unethical, but again, that's like the typical campaign commercial.
Except it was not a commercial. It is a false statement made at the request of Biden's campaign designed to bolster him.
*FORMER* titles. Any group of people with fancy histories in government can group together to support a candidate or challenge the claims of a candidate. It's a free country.

Good for him. And he's been doing a good job of it too.
The families of the 13 dead in Afghanistan would disagree.
I hear tell that former President Trump has used his title and influence to make false statements to influence a national election. FEC don't care about any of this, even if Jim Jordan expires angry about it.
Strawman - this is not about Trump - as much as one would like it to be, it is not.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
38,083
17,555
Finger Lakes
✟12,509.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Except it was not a commercial. It is a false statement made at the request of Biden's campaign designed to bolster him.

The families of the 13 dead in Afghanistan would disagree.

Strawman - this is not about Trump - as much as one would like it to be, it is not.
Their statement was not false.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USincognito
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,270
36,594
Los Angeles Area
✟829,992.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Strawman - this is not about Trump - as much as one would like it to be, it is not.
It is about whether private citizens can provide massive help to a campaign. They can.
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
6,866
7,475
PA
✟320,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Except it was not a commercial. It is a false statement made at the request of Biden's campaign designed to bolster him.
Are you implying that, had it been presented as a 30-second TV spot rather than a letter, you would have had no problems with it?
 
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,920
14,014
Broken Arrow, OK
✟702,471.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
6,866
7,475
PA
✟320,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Yes, it certainly is
Then surely you can point out which parts of their statement are false? I'll quote it here for convenience:
We are all individuals who devoted significant portions of our lives to national security. Some of us served in senior positions in policy departments and agencies, and some of us served in senior positions in the Intelligence Community. Some of us were political appointees, and some were career officials. Many of us worked for presidents of both political parties.

We are all also individuals who see Russia as one of our nation’s primary adversaries. All of us have an understanding of the wide range of Russian overt and covert activities that undermine US national security, with some of us knowing Russian behavior intimately, as we worked to defend our nation against it for a career. A few of us worked against Russian information operations in the United States in the last several years.

Perhaps most important, each of us believes deeply that American citizens should determine the outcome of elections, not foreign governments. All of us agree with the founding fathers’ concern about the damage that foreign interference in our politics can do to our democracy. It is for all these reasons that we write to say that the arrival on the US political scene of emails purportedly belonging to Vice President Biden’s son Hunter, much of it related to his timeserving on the Board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.

We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement — just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case.

If we are right, this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this election, and we believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this.

There are a number of factors that make us suspicious of Russian involvement.

Such an operation would be consistent with Russian objectives, as outlined publicly and recently by the Intelligence Community, to create political chaos in the United States and to deepen political divisions here but also to undermine the candidacy of former Vice President Biden and thereby help the candidacy of President Trump. For the Russians at this point, with Trump down in the polls, there is incentive for Moscow to pull out the stops to do anything possible to help Trump win and/or to weaken Biden should he win. A “laptop op” fits the bill, as the publication of the emails are clearly designed to discredit Biden.

Such an operation would be consistent with some of the key methods Russia has used in its now multi-year operation to interfere in our democracy – the hacking (via cyber operations) and the dumping of accurate information or the distribution of inaccurate or misinformation. Russia did both of these during the 2016 presidential election – judgments shared by the US Intelligence Community, the investigation into Russian activities by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and the entirety (all Republicans and Democrats) on the current Senate Intelligence Committee.

Such an operation is also consistent with several data points. The Russians, according to media reports and cybersecurity experts, targeted Burisma late last year for cyber collection and gained access to its emails. And Ukrainian politician and businessman Adriy Derkach, identified and sanctioned by the US Treasury Department for being a 10-year Russian agent interfering in the 2020 election, passed purported materials on Burisma and Hunter Biden to Giuliani.

Our view that the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue is consistent with two other significant data points as well. According to the Washington Post, citing four sources, “U.S. intelligence agencies warned the White House last year that Giuliani was the target of an influence operation by Russian intelligence.”

In addition, media reports say that the FBI has now opened an investigation into Russian involvement in this case. According to USA Today, “…federal authorities are investigating whether the material supplied to the New York Post by Rudy Giuliani…is part of a smoke bomb of disinformation pushed by Russia.”

We do not know whether these press reports are accurate, but they do suggest concern within Executive Branch departments and agencies that mirrors ours. It is high time that Russia stops interfering in our democracy.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,270
36,594
Los Angeles Area
✟829,992.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Not talking about some random private citizen.
So, more like this then?

 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
16,634
10,452
Earth
✟142,974.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,920
14,014
Broken Arrow, OK
✟702,471.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Then surely you can point out which parts of their statement are false? I'll quote it here for convenience:
Read the link in the OP - 65 pages explaining in detail
Then why bother with the distinction?
I did not bring it up
So, more like this then?

There is a difference between people endorsing a candidacy and making a false statement - they were not saying they endorsed Biden - they said the laptop (which they never saw nor reviewed) was Russian disinformation at the request of Biden's campaign - people are waking up to the difference.
No clue what that means
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
20,916
17,305
✟1,429,236.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,270
36,594
Los Angeles Area
✟829,992.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
There is a difference between people endorsing a candidacy and making a false statement
In both cases, they were expressing opinions, freely. Like "For the past eight years, America’s armed forces have been subjected to a series of ill considered and debilitating budget cuts, policy choices and combat operations that have left the superb men and women in uniform less capable of performing their vital missions in the future than we require them to be." Or "We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement — just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case."
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

hislegacy

Memories pre 2021
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
43,920
14,014
Broken Arrow, OK
✟702,471.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In both cases, they were expressing opinions, freely. Like "For the past eight years, America’s armed forces have been subjected to a series of ill considered and debilitating budget cuts, policy choices and combat operations that have left the superb men and women in uniform less capable of performing their vital missions in the future than we require them to be." Or "We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement — just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case."
Wrong.

One is saying. We like this candidate and you should vote for him

The other is saying we looked at the evidence and it looks like Russian interference. EXCEPT they never looked at it.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
38,083
17,555
Finger Lakes
✟12,509.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes, it certainly is
Read the link in the OP - 65 pages explaining in detail
I couldn't find that they thought any statement in the letter was false.

The letter i much more brief - most of it is signatures and credentials - so you be able to easily pick out what you believe is false.
The other is saying we looked at the evidence and it looks like Russian interference. EXCEPT they never looked at it.
No, they specifically state that they did not examine the evidence, but the circumstances, particularly the way the emails just showed up at the NYPost via Giuliani seemed very like a Russian disinformation scheme.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
6,866
7,475
PA
✟320,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Read the link in the OP - 65 pages explaining in detail
I did. It does not point out a single false statement from the letter, nor does it make the claim that the statements in the letter are false. That's why I asked you - you're the one saying that the writers made false statements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
6,866
7,475
PA
✟320,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The other is saying we looked at the evidence and it looks like Russian interference.
Where does it say that? I quoted the full text of the letter (minus the title and the signatures) in post #87. Show me where it says "we looked at the evidence". Heck, show me where it says that the writers looked at anything.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
16,634
10,452
Earth
✟142,974.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
No they didn't.
It’s sort of a moot point, though, this thread, no?
“The real reason” Trump was cheated out of his second term was that people conspired to share an opinion!

Which is, (assuming they’re all Americans), perfectly normal and legal political speech.
But we have to be outraged because stuff.
 
Upvote 0