• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Best Argument For or Against God's Existence

Status
Not open for further replies.

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
It was not ancient. It was brand new and designed by the Creator of the universe.
It only needed to stay upright as it had no engine.
Do you know how much room a hibernating turtle, that is not breathing, needs?
And there are no waves or even a breeze mentioned, so it needed not be
ocean worthy. It just needed to be buoyant.

God could have had the Ark carved out of rock if He was looking for dramatic effect.
Fphoto-66290501-6CC.jpg
If you are appealing to magic, God could have merely teleported the animals and peoples he wanted to time after the alleged flood.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If you are appealing to magic, God could have merely teleported the animals and peoples he wanted to time after the alleged flood.
If the story needs to get so elaborate in order to be deemed plausible, one wonders why it wouldn't have been easier to pursue other methods of "cleansing the Earth;" methods that do not involve a globally destructive flood, an unseaworthy vessel that needs magic to avoid sinking, and a devastating population bottleneck.
 
Upvote 0

nonbeliever314

....grinding teeth.
Mar 11, 2015
398
49
✟23,292.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
It was not ancient. It was brand new and designed by the Creator of the universe.
It only needed to stay upright as it had no engine.
Do you know how much room a hibernating turtle, that is not breathing, needs?
And there are no waves or even a breeze mentioned, so it needed not be
ocean worthy. It just needed to be buoyant.

God could have had the Ark carved out of rock if He was looking for dramatic effect.
Fphoto-66290501-6CC.jpg

I can move water without touching or handling it.
 
Upvote 0

paulm50

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
1,253
110
✟2,061.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
37 Miracles of Jesus

# Miracle Matthew Mark Luke John
1 Jesus Turns Water into Wine 2:1-11
2 Jesus Heals an Official's Son 4:43-54
3 Jesus Drives Out an Evil Spirit 1:21-27 4:31-36
4 Jesus Heals Peter's Mother-in-Law 8:14-15 1:29-31 4:38-39
5 Jesus Heals Many Sick at Evening 8:16-17 1:32-34 4:40-41
6 First Miraculous Catch of Fish 5:1-11
7 Jesus Cleanses a Man With Leprosy 8:1-4 1:40-45 5:12-14
8 Jesus Heals a Centurion's Servant 8:5-13 7:1-10
9 Jesus Heals a Paralytic 9:1-8 2:1-12 5:17-26
10 Jesus Heals a Man's Withered Hand 12:9-14 3:1-6 6:6-11
11 Jesus Raises a Widow's Son in Nain 7:11-17
12 Jesus Calms a Storm 8:23-27 4:35-41 8:22-25
13 Jesus Casts Demons into a Herd of Pigs 8:28-33 5:1-20 8:26-39
14 Jesus Heals a Woman in the Crowd 9:20-22 5:25-34 8:42-48
15 Jesus Raises Jairus' Daughter to Life 9:18,
23-26 5:21-24,
35-43 8:40-42,
49-56
16 Jesus Heals Two Blind Men 9:27-31
17 Jesus Heals a Man Unable to Speak 9:32-34
18 Jesus Heals an Invalid at Bethesda 5:1-15
19 Jesus Feeds 5,000 14:13-21 6:30-44 9:10-17 6:1-15
20 Jesus Walks on Water 14:22-33 6:45-52 6:16-21



I'm not sure if Saints need one or two miracles under their belt.

List of saints canonized by Pope Francis
Not a jot on some faith healers.

His failure was in converting his own people.
 
Upvote 0

paulm50

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
1,253
110
✟2,061.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

paulm50

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
1,253
110
✟2,061.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
The Jews who wrote the bible were a beaten tribe trying to stay together. They needed to talk up their own grup and faith, while surrounded by far stronger Empires.

So what has the Jewish god ever done for them? Apologies to Monty Python. The answer is very little. The Jews didn't reject Jesus, he's supposed to be the son of god. Jesus failed to convince them. All he did was convince others to start a new religion. Since then and up to 1960, they have been persecuted, murdered and slaughtered in millions.

So not much uses to them.

What has the Christian god done for us? Not a lot, the success of europeans is far more about Europe being where it is than some power from above. What have we used the power for? To persecute, murder, abuse and slaughter tens of millions. Often in the name of Christianity.

And the evidence of a god is? We occasionally do good things.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Not a jot on some faith healers.
His failure was in converting his own people.

The ones who were killed for insisting on His resurrection?
Who would do that for you?
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Even hiberation doesn't explain how he managed to squeaaze 3,000,000 different species onto the Ark.

Try again.

The Bible makes no mention of species.
If you are making a scientific case, you
need to stick to the exact specifications
found in the source document to test
the case.

In this case, the source specifies about 2
of each kind. And this only included certain
classes of animals of a specific type.

Because these were hand-picked by God
Himself, they could be chosen by the ability
to quickly speciate quickly to the level of
diversity we see today.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The conclusion of the KCA version I advocate is not contested by any scientist (at least no one in this thread has been able to name any scientists that disagree with it) and yet supports a belief in God.
It also supports a belief in assorted non-divine sources for the universe. If the argument is consistent with both godly and mundane causes for the universe, it certainly can't be said to be in favor of one over the other and is thus off-topic for this thread.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Joshua260

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2012
1,448
42
North Carolina
✟17,004.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Ok. Now explain in extreme detail how the Christian god and the other 5 "caused the existence of the universe.
I don't see how me not being able to explain in "extreme detail" how any one of those candidates caused the universe to exist proves anything. I can't explain how a lot of things work, but that doesn't prove that they don't.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I don't see how me not being able to explain in "extreme detail" how any one of those candidates caused the universe to exist proves anything. I can't explain how a lot of things work, but that doesn't prove that they don't.

How about Willy? Can Willy explain how God created the universe billions of years ago and the earth 13+ billion years ago?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Joshua260

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2012
1,448
42
North Carolina
✟17,004.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
WLC didn't have a handy quote to steal from to respond to my argument?
I don't need Craig to figure out that you do not understand the doctrine of the Trinity correctly. In any case, I chose not to continue that line of communication because it is off-topic. In this thread, my exchanges have centered around the KCA.
 
Upvote 0

Joshua260

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2012
1,448
42
North Carolina
✟17,004.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It also supports a belief in assorted non-divine sources for the universe. If the argument is consistent with both godly and mundane causes for the universe, it certainly can't be said to be in favor of one over the other and is thus off-topic for this thread.
This is just plainly incorrect. For example, the blood on the gloves in the OJ case supports a belief in a narrow range of possible suspects. Putting that evidence together with other evidence further narrows down the list of possible suspects to just one man.

In like manner, the KCA supports the belief in a narrow range of suggested beings with specific characteristics. Put that evidence together with other evidence narrows down the list to God.
 
Upvote 0

Joshua260

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2012
1,448
42
North Carolina
✟17,004.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have already done that. None of them made the cut. If you can't get your personal version of the Christian god over the bar, I would not worry about the others.
It happens that my God does make the cut. The characteristics of the cause suggested by the KCA fits perfectly with the Christian god. To say that he doesn't is simply denial.
 
Upvote 0

Achilles6129

Veteran
Feb 19, 2006
4,504
367
Columbus, Ohio
✟44,682.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
So was Noah's Ark impossible? Or just highly improbable? Remember that an event that's extremely, extremely unlikely from a naturalistic point of view (say, 1 in a trillion chance) can be accomplished by the Creator of the universe. So I think you need to understand what the terms "impossible" and "highly improbable" actually mean. Obviously, if you're a naturalist, you're going to think that something very highly improbable (like walking on water) might actually be impossible. But that's only because you're a naturalist.

http://creation.com/how-did-all-the-animals-fit-on-noahs-ark

Edited to add: http://creation.com/noahs-ark-questions-and-answers
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joshua260
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
This is just plainly incorrect. For example, the blood on the gloves in the OJ case supports a belief in a narrow range of possible suspects. Putting that evidence together with other evidence further narrows down the list of possible suspects to just one man.

In like manner, the KCA supports the belief in a narrow range of suggested beings with specific characteristics. Put that evidence together with other evidence narrows down the list to God.

Show us specifically and in detail, this evidence that narrows the list down to God.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.