When I see someone criticising and opposing a ministry, I want to find out more of the background of the person doing the criticising. What is there in the background and the type of church that is behind the person opposing the ministry? This gives clues to why the opposition is there.
For example, a person who belongs to an anti-Charismatic church and who has been trained to believe that Charismatics are of the devil, will give a totally different review of a ministry than a person who has had most of his Christian life in a Pentecostal/Charismatic environment and been trained in the gifts and ministries of the Spirit.
You're absolutely right.
Personally, I have a very Charismatic background. I believe God moves in powerful and sometimes in a very 'supernatural' way. But yet I can't ignore God, who through the New Testament writers, reminds us to be 'wise as serpents' 'testing everything.' It seems He wants us to be balanced and centered in Him and His Word.
I also feel it's my God-given duty to warn others of what evidence has shown to be charlatan behaviour.
If people still want to follow and give him their money, then that is their choice. Just like Benny Hinn has the freedom to continue his tent ministry, so I have the freedom to call it what I believe God calls it.
Usually, people who have soul-winning and healing ministries are too busy serving the Lord to worry about who is criticising them or what they are saying. There are too many people who have needs and who are getting them met through the ministry; even if that ministry has faults when open it up to criticism from Christians who believe their particular church is the "perfect" one without faults.
There are true soul-winning and healing ministries around the globe which are not the self-serving show that Hinn has turned his act into. I fully support truly humble and Godly ministries. "You can identify them by their fruit, that is, by the way they act. Can you pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?" - Matthew 7:16
Upvote
0