I agree with Kirsten that baptism is a symbol - an outward sign of an inward change. Baptism does not save us. I also believe that the bible talks about baptism by immersion. Lastly, I think that baptism should be carried out on adults (or people who are aware of what is going on and what is happening). I will look at all these points in more detail below. I am currently having this very debate with people close to me so have been doing a lot of research into it and will provide links below to additional reading that you might be interested in.
First - and most importantly - baptism does not save you. Look at arguably the most famous passage in the bible.
(John 3:16-18 ESV)
Notice "whoever believes is not condemned" - It doesn't say whoever believes is not condemned if they have been baptised.
Another important passage for this debate is from EPHESIANS 2:8-10.
.
Notice that we are clearly told that we are saved through faith - not as a result of "works"
There are many, many more verses that back this up. I found
this after a quick google search.
There are arguments that seem to argue the opposite - that baptism is necessary for salvation. Look at Acts 2:38 for example. (ESV). Without going into too much detail - looking at the Greek we find that it is nothing more than a poor translation. Look
here for a better explanation. I do however think that you should be baptised. I believe it to be an important step of obedience and if somebody chose not to be baptised I would question whether they had given their life to Jesus and as a result whether they were saved. This doesn't mean however that baptism is what saves them. The last point I will make on this is the prisoner on the cross next to Jesus.
(Luke 23:39-43 ESV)
Every scholar I have read work from, spoken to or heard about agrees that the prisoner was almost certainly not baptised although Jesus promised that he would be with him in paradise. Some people argue that this was the Old Covenant but that wouldn't make sense on two accounts. Firstly, in old law sacrifices are needed to pardon people and secondly Jesus died on the cross BEFORE the two next to him.
(John 19:31-34 ESV)
Secondly - regarding immersion - I think that where possible baptism should be by immersion. The word baptise comes from the Greek "
baptizen" which means to submerge or to drench. To re-iterate - I don't think that Baptism saves you so if you have been baptised for the right reasons (I'll get onto that later) but not by immersion I don't think that you will be going to hell. I do believe that baptism in the New Testament was by immersion. I think most branches of Christianity would agree that following the NT is what we should be trying to do.
Thirdly - if baptism doesn't save you and it is a sign of turning around (that is literally what repent means), then what use is there in baptising infants (or anyone else who is not capable of giving their life to Jesus and his kingdom)? There are no biblical accounts of infants being baptised. Baptism requires belief in Jesus so people who cannot believe or do not believe cannot be baptised (not in the biblical sense anyway)
(Acts 8:36-38)
I hope that I haven't mis-quoted, or misused any biblical passages and I'm sure that if I have then I will be picked up later on. This is a controversial topic and an important one. The best advice I can give is look at as many arguments on both sides as possible, speak to as many people as possible, ask questions, read your bible and pray for help with understanding. God Bless!