Australia keeping thousands of children in concentration camps

[ThatRobGuy]

you don't answer the question
why don't the Australia ban migrants from white country's?

Because the people from the "white countries" aren't violating immigration laws in order to get in...

Just like with any other facet of law, certain things require one to go through the proper channels.

That'd be like if a person who got busted for driving without a license started complaining that other people, who were licensed, weren't getting busted.

...and based on your wording, I don't think you fully understand what a concentration camp is. Detention center != "concentration camp". These folks aren't being subjected to forced labor or awaiting mass execution so the term doesn't apply.

I suspect you're using that term in attempts to make an emotional appeal to support your position.

 

[ThatRobGuy]

you still don't answer the question

why don't the Australia ban migrants from white country's?

I did answer your question...because the migrants from the white countries aren't violating the law.

They're not banning migrants of any kind...they're enforcing immigration laws. ...big distinction there.

 

[yeshuaslavejeff]

How'd they get to Australia?

Canoe

 

[Desk trauma]

Australia doesn't ban immigration, or refugees, from nonwhite countries.

 

[Landon Caeli]

you don't answer the question
why don't the Australia ban migrants from white country's?

Because the "whites", as you prefer to call them, follow rules. They migrate legally, not by illegal smugglers. That's why.

 

[naveed]

Australia doesn't ban immigration, or refugees, from nonwhite countries.

then why are there no white children in this concentration camps?

 

[Landon Caeli]

then why are there no white children in this concentration camps?

Because the parents of the white kids must follow rules

 

[Desk trauma]

then why are there no white children in this concentration camps?

Because people from "white" countries aren't smuggling themselves into the country illegally and claiming asylum when found.

 

[Kerensa]

They are illegal immigrants that paid thousands of dollars to people smugglers to ship them to Australia.. Australia put a stop to the human trafficking by not allowing any of the illegal arrivals to settle in Australia sending a strong signal to everyone that paying organized crime gangs to help you infiltrate Australia illegally would not work.. So while now no people are drowning and dying in the sea off the Australian coast this year because of illegal migration crime.. In the Mediterranean the encouragement of illegal human traffickers by the callous German president Merkel has been the cause of over 2000 drownings this year alone...

Well done Australia..
Shame on Germany..

Australia is my home country and what it does to asylum seekers (and has been doing for many years now) is a sickening shame and a blatant violation of human rights. Have a read of Amnesty International Australia's report on one of these "processing" centres (read: prison camps) before you repeat the vile self-serving rubbish that the Australian Government spouts to persuade the public to believe that this is a just solution to the problems of people smuggling and border protection: Australia’s regime of cruelty in Nauru - Amnesty International Australia

You can read more here from Amnesty about the problem in general and the "deliberate system of abuse" created by the Australian government: Refugees and asylum seekers - Amnesty International Australia

The term "human trafficking", by the way, correctly refers to the transporting of people against their wills for forced labour or sexual exploitation. That is not the same as people smuggling, which is what is happening in the case of refugees trying to get to Australia or other countries by any means possible. It's still a crime, but a different one — and in this case, regardless of all the rhetoric about stopping people smugglers, the treatment given to their victims (i.e. the refugees) belies any supposedly noble intentions on Australia's part.

There is also no such thing as an "illegal" asylum seeker. The vast majority of these people who are trying to reach Australia are legitimate refugees fleeing war zones, tyrannical regimes or other serious threats to their lives or freedom — otherwise why would they go to such desperate lengths? The smugglers who promise to get them there are acting illegally, BUT THE ASYLUM SEEKERS THEMSELVES ARE NOT.

Shame on the Australian government (successive governments, sadly) and shame on everyone who falls for their pernicious lies and thinks this travesty is any kind of just or humane solution. Thank you, Naveed, for sharing the truth about it.

 

[naveed]

Because the parents of the white kids must follow rules

Did those British folks violate immigration law to get there?

Because the people from the "white countries" aren't violating immigration laws in order to get in...

Just like with any other facet of law, certain things require one to go through the proper channels.

That'd be like if a person who got busted for driving without a license started complaining that other people, who were licensed, weren't getting busted.

...and based on your wording, I don't think you fully understand what a concentration camp is. Detention center != "concentration camp". These folks aren't being subjected to forced labor or awaiting mass execution so the term doesn't apply.

I suspect you're using that term in attempts to make an emotional appeal to support your position.

They came in by doing the right thing in making an application to our immigration department.. Plus they have skills that the Australian economy needs.. Australia takes in many thousands of law abiding noble immigrants from many different nations from all over the world who knock on the front door and wait respectfully to be invited inside. But we do not illegals who seek to break in through the back window with the help of criminal human smugglers ... That type if home invader activity must be stopped and such people must be barred from ever entering Australia again..

but

which rules and laws did white people follow

when they committed genocide on

indigenous aboriginal people and stole their land

 

[Desk trauma]

and which rules did white people follow

when they committed genocide on native aborigines

British law.

 

[Adstar]

why don't the Australia ban economic migrants from white country's?

Between 2005 and 2010, nearly 107,000
economic migrants from the england came in to Australia

Why are so many Britons leaving Australia? - BBC News

They came in by doing the right thing in making an application to our immigration department.. Plus they have skills that the Australian economy needs.. Australia takes in many thousands of law abiding noble immigrants from many different nations from all over the world who knock on the front door and wait respectfully to be invited inside. But we do not illegals who seek to break in through the back window with the help of criminal human smugglers ... That type if home invader activity must be stopped and such people must be barred from ever entering Australia again..

 

[Adstar]

And Australia does not ban non white immagrants.. This is an ignorant statement based of the false perception of racisim which is false..

Australia has accepted many REAL refugees from South Sudan in recent years .. The Australian imarant department sent staff to their refugee camps and these true refugees went through a interview process and where selected legally and they where flown free of charge to Australia without problem..

In the 2006 census, there were 19,049 Sudanese-born Australian residents..
Source::
Sudanese Australians - Wikipedia

If Australians where the racists monsters naveed is doing his best to make them out to be then they would not be allowing Sudanese people to come to Australia.. You have been told too many lies about Australia Naveed .. Maybe your education system in your country is the racist one??

 

[Landon Caeli]

Australia is my home country and what it does to asylum seekers (and has been doing for many years now) is a sickening shame and a blatant violation of human rights. Have a read of Amnesty International Australia's report on one of these "processing" centres (read: prison camps) before you repeat the vile self-serving rubbish that the Australian Government spouts to persuade the public to believe that this is a just solution to the problems of people smuggling and border protection: Australia’s regime of cruelty in Nauru - Amnesty International Australia

You can read more here from Amnesty about the problem in general and the "deliberate system of abuse" created by the Australian government: Refugees and asylum seekers - Amnesty International Australia

The term "human trafficking", by the way, correctly refers to the transporting of people against their wills for forced labour or sexual exploitation. That is not the same as people smuggling, which is what is happening in the case of refugees trying to get to Australia or other countries by any means possible. It's still a crime, but a different one — and in this case, regardless of all the rhetoric about stopping people smugglers, the treatment given to their victims (i.e. the refugees) belies any supposedly noble intentions on Australia's part.

There is also no such thing as an "illegal" asylum seeker. The vast majority of these people who are trying to reach Australia are legitimate refugees fleeing war zones, tyrannical regimes or other serious threats to their lives or freedom — otherwise why would they go to such desperate lengths? The smugglers who promise to get them there are acting illegally, BUT THE ASYLUM SEEKERS THEMSELVES ARE NOT.

Shame on the Australian government (successive governments, sadly) and shame on everyone who falls for their pernicious lies and thinks this travesty is any kind of just or humane solution. Thank you, Naveed, for sharing the truth about it.

I take it some people are really angry about this. Is there nowhere else they can go?

 

[Adstar]

Australia is my home country and what it does to asylum seekers (and has been doing for many years now) is a sickening shame and a blatant violation of human rights. Have a read of Amnesty International Australia's report on one of these "processing" centres (read: prison camps) before you repeat the vile self-serving rubbish that the Australian Government spouts to persuade the public to believe that this is a just solution to the problems of people smuggling and border protection: Australia’s regime of cruelty in Nauru - Amnesty International Australia

You can read more here from Amnesty about the problem in general and the "deliberate system of abuse" created by the Australian government: Refugees and asylum seekers - Amnesty International Australia

The term "human trafficking", by the way, correctly refers to the transporting of people against their wills for forced labour or sexual exploitation. That is not the same as people smuggling, which is what is happening in the case of refugees trying to get to Australia or other countries by any means possible. It's still a crime, but a different one — and in this case, regardless of all the rhetoric about stopping people smugglers, the treatment given to their victims (i.e. the refugees) belies any supposedly noble intentions on Australia's part.

There is also no such thing as an "illegal" asylum seeker. The vast majority of these people who are trying to reach Australia are legitimate refugees fleeing war zones, tyrannical regimes or other serious threats to their lives or freedom — otherwise why would they go to such desperate lengths? The smugglers who promise to get them there are acting illegally, BUT THE ASYLUM SEEKERS THEMSELVES ARE NOT.

Shame on the Australian government (successive governments, sadly) and shame on everyone who falls for their pernicious lies and thinks this travesty is any kind of just or humane solution. Thank you, Naveed, for sharing the truth about it.

I totally reject your post and the false narrative being pushed by amnesty international.. Many of the illegal infiltrators have stayed in the camps way longer then they should have because of the greedy lawyers who keep giving them false hope that if they stay in the camps, then eventually Australia will declare some kind of amnesty and allow them to be rewarded for their criminal activity.. So the greedy lawyers grow richer and richer by launching their many appeals to higher and higher courts raking in their filthy money while the people in the camps have no real hope.. They are being used and a source of easy money by lawyers and wasting years of their lives when they could be establishing a new life in Iran or Sri Lanka.. So shame on these money hungry lawyers and all who support the organized crime gangs who smuggle people for profit..

You and people like you are aiding and abetting organized crime and the unnecessary suffering of thousands of people by encouraging illegal immigration so shame on you..

 

[paul becke]

They used to have a White Australia policy, but have relaxed it so that there are many people from Asia and India there today. It is a sad fact, however, that there is a very primitive streak in all human beings, that they don't want to feel their their sense of identity is being swamped by incomers who actually look different.

Its a subliminal pre-rational thing. I would go as far as to sugget that it occurs at a reptilian, psychopathic level. But even good people can struggle with it, if they sense that they are being taken over (about which they are invariably wrong). As Augustine put it : Grace builds upon Nature. We cannot become virtuous by single acts of the will in relation to each sin. Christianity would have been a cake-walk otherwise.

However, a far greater problem, imo, is ethnic cultural clashes, once incomers look as if they are ceasing to be a minority, and the indigenous people fear the prospect of having a foreign religious culture imposed on them. Now, it could happen, given the decadence of our culture today.

I have always deplored the psychological rejection many West Indians must have suffered after they immigrated to the UK, since they were Christians - indeed, like the Muslims today, generally, far more devout than us. However, ethnic cultural clashes are a different ball-game and responsiblity lies with both parties. I would say it should have been obligatory to assimilate into our Christian culture - at least in the medium to long term - with weekly classes set aside in Asian schools here, to learn about our religious culture and history. However, only vestiges of it remain, so I can't blame Muslims, Hindus et al for wanting to retain their religious affiliation.

 

[paul becke]

Australia is my home country and what it does to asylum seekers (and has been doing for many years now) is a sickening shame and a blatant violation of human rights. Have a read of Amnesty International Australia's report on one of these "processing" centres (read: prison camps) before you repeat the vile self-serving rubbish that the Australian Government spouts to persuade the public to believe that this is a just solution to the problems of people smuggling and border protection: Australia’s regime of cruelty in Nauru - Amnesty International Australia

You can read more here from Amnesty about the problem in general and the "deliberate system of abuse" created by the Australian government: Refugees and asylum seekers - Amnesty International Australia

The term "human trafficking", by the way, correctly refers to the transporting of people against their wills for forced labour or sexual exploitation. That is not the same as people smuggling, which is what is happening in the case of refugees trying to get to Australia or other countries by any means possible. It's still a crime, but a different one — and in this case, regardless of all the rhetoric about stopping people smugglers, the treatment given to their victims (i.e. the refugees) belies any supposedly noble intentions on Australia's part.

There is also no such thing as an "illegal" asylum seeker. The vast majority of these people who are trying to reach Australia are legitimate refugees fleeing war zones, tyrannical regimes or other serious threats to their lives or freedom — otherwise why would they go to such desperate lengths? The smugglers who promise to get them there are acting illegally, BUT THE ASYLUM SEEKERS THEMSELVES ARE NOT.

Shame on the Australian government (successive governments, sadly) and shame on everyone who falls for their pernicious lies and thinks this travesty is any kind of just or humane solution. Thank you, Naveed, for sharing the truth about it.

Do you have a solution that would be fair and just in the eyes of both parties, Kerensa ? Or does Amnesty International ? What would your idea of a fair and just solution be, given that they are seeking to trespass, to squat, which is what unauthorised immigration is ?

Europe is a much bigger problem, since being economic migrants is only a part of the nightmare the many Middle-Eastern migrants have suffered. They have nothing, and through no fault of their own.

 

[Kerensa]

Well, perhaps for them to be processed onshore in Australia as promptly as possible, to be housed in decent conditions during that period, and for those who are found to be genuine refugees to be resettled in Australia and those who are not genuine refugees to be deported. It's the least a civilised country could do. And yes, Amnesty International does have solutions that they're campaigning for, if you read all the information in the second link I provided earlier.

The people who are smuggling these asylum seekers are criminals and should be brought to justice. The majority of the people they are transporting are not criminals; most of them are genuine refugees who are resorting to desperate measures to get to a country that they hope will take them in. Yet they are the ones being demonised and dehumanised by all this false rhetoric about "illegals", "queue-jumpers" and so on, and by being housed in often appalling conditions in offshore detention centres in Nauru and Manus Island so that the Australian government can wash their hands of them. How is that just or acceptable?

A couple more articles worth reading, from specifically Christian sources:

World Refugee Day 2015: What’s Missing from the Asylum Seeker Conversation? | Stories forTomorrow - TEAR Australia

For you yourselves were foreigners... - St. David's Cathedral

And as everyone familiar with the Christmas story will know, but it bears repeating...

 

[Trogdor the Burninator]

if the Australia don't wants more economic migrants, why don't the Australia ban economic migrants from the white countries?

Got nothing to do with race, white or otherwise. There are plenty of "non-white" immigrants who immigrate

 

[Waggles]

Australia keeping thousands of men, women and
children in detention camps,

What a load of rubbish.
I notice that your news source is no less that the world famous fake news broadcaster CNN.
Just as bad as our local left-wing fake news broadcaster the ABC.

They are illegal immigrants choosing to force their way into Australia by simply arriving on our
shores and declaring here we are, take us or we will shout and scream to demand our entitlements.
Nothing stopping them from seeking a better life in Indonesia or Malaysia or Thailand, etc. etc.