Atheists, Theists, and Evolution

[Willtor]

I poured myself a bowl of Alphabits cereal this morning, and after staring into it for several hours I was able to discern a lucid refutation of all of EV's arguments, especially his first axiomatic self-evident truth, and I would share it with you now, but I got hungry and ate it.

Sorry.

And yet, by a strange twist of events, so did mine. I, however, had the foresight to photograph it:

If you look really, really carefully, the solution presents itself.

 

[chaoschristian]

And yet, by a strange twist of events, so did mine. I, however, had the foresight to photograph it:

If you look really, really carefully, the solution presents itself.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Willtor again.

​

 

[mikeynov]

Atheists, Theists, and Evolution

How do we explain when all three agree ?

Objective persons know genuine theists and genuine atheists are mortal worldview enemies. But the facts of reality make this objective observation a "lie" when the issue is evolution.

For all intents and purposes, all atheists support and defend neo-Darwinian evolution. This fact betrays an axiomatic truth: If evolution was anything about supporting the existence and handiwork of the Genesis Creator, then they would not support.

However, a large mass of persons who think of themselves as theists and Christians wholeheartedly support and defend neo-Darwinian evolution just as much as any atheist.

These preceding facts demand ONE fact is not a fact.

Either the atheist is not a real atheist or the theist/Christian is not a real theist/Christian IF the first fact is true (atheists and theists mortal worldview enemies).

There is no way around it; the theists/Christians are not as such. How do we now explain their belief about themselves and actions ?

Luke 22:48

"But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?"

Judas = TEists.

kiss = support of atheist evolution.

Looks like the Bible perfectly corresponds with reality.

EV

Remember the time you pretended to be an atheist, got caught, disappeared for a year, and then started your shenigans over again?

How's kookery treating you?

 

[Nathan Poe]

You imply that atheist and theist cannot agree. Well, they do, on a lot of things. I'm willing to bet we agree that 1 + 1 = 2.

Don't be so sure -- I'd bet that a few YECs might argue the point simply out of spite.

 

[Deamiter]

The repeated flaming of Christians who accept evolution is not acceptable on Christian Forums. We define "Christian" by the Nicean Creed as many of you know, which does not require a particular view of origins. Further, even if that were not true, there's too much flaming in this thread to justify leaving it open.

I would like to point out STRONGLY that responding to this sort of violation with insults is NOT acceptable. Calling somebody stupid or insane just fuels flame wars and will not be tolerated.