Your arguement is meaningless and circular because you present no evidence. You have to have a controled study. You take the people who believe in the God of the Bible and compare them to the people who do NOT believe in the God of the Bible. If in your study the people who DO NOT believe in the God of the Bible are more happy, healthy and content. Then by all means go for it.
I don't know what you mean by me not presenting evidence and that my argument is circular because of it. I was making an argument similar to Euthyphro's dilemma about how you can 'know' that god is good.
The experiment you propose where you compare factors like happiness and well-being is completely irrelevant to the point I was making about god being good. I don't know why you brought it up.
But since you did, let me give you some facts about non religious people.
"A growing body of social science research reveals that atheists, and non-religious people in general, are far from the unsavory beings many assume them to be. On basic questions of morality and human decency issues such as governmental use of torture, the death penalty, punitive hitting of children, racism, sexism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, environmental degradation or human rights the irreligious tend to be more ethical than their religious peers, particularly compared with those who describe themselves as very religious.
Consider that at the societal level, murder rates are far lower in secularized nations such as Japan or Sweden than they are in the much more religious United States, which also has a much greater portion of its population in prison. Even within this country, those states with the highest levels of church attendance, such as Louisiana and Mississippi, have significantly higher murder rates than far less religious states such as Vermont and Oregon.
As individuals, atheists tend to score high on measures of intelligence, especially verbal ability and scientific literacy. They tend to raise their children to solve problems rationally, to make up their own minds when it comes to existential questions and to obey the golden rule. They are more likely to practice safe sex than the strongly religious are, and are less likely to be nationalistic or ethnocentric. They value freedom of thought. "
source:
Why do Americans still dislike atheists? - The Washington Post
Of course it maybe difficult for you to make a determination as to who believes in the God of the Bible because you do not even know what to look for. You lump all people who claim to believe in God together, without even making a determination if it is really the God of the Bible they believe in.
I do not lump all believers together, I wasn't even talking about believers, I don't know where you read this in my post. Please stop creating strawmen.
In my case I compare my life to before I read the Bible to after I read the Bible and started to apply it to my life. For me it is a no brainer. My life is way better now then it was back then. There is no way I would ever go back to a life without God. I can only give a witness and a testimony to what I have found to be true.
Personal experience isn't evidence or proof. If your life is better with god than without, good for you. Everybody has a right to their own beliefs. But not their own facts.