• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Atheists/Agnostics & Death

Deidre32

Follow Thy Heart
Mar 23, 2014
3,926
2,438
Somewhere else...
✟82,366.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Pretty much my view, too. If there is common ground (as between Christians of different denominations) there might be some reason to haggle, but as between Theists and Atheists, that's not the case.

Well, the one thing we all have in common, is we will all die someday, and lose others through death, and to say for sure that any of us know what exists after this life, if anything at all, with 100% certainty in either direction, would be wildly presumptuous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zippy2006
Upvote 0

Deidre32

Follow Thy Heart
Mar 23, 2014
3,926
2,438
Somewhere else...
✟82,366.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It's difficult to tell Atheist anything of a spiritual nature, they generally have to discover the truth through experience and painful ego deflation or not. Not every acorn becomes a tree, the gift of choice in the will of the children of God allows us to chose God or forsake him. Some people choose the doctrines of death.

Yes, but atheism isn't about ego, as many might assume. Not everyone is like Richard Dawkins. lol ;)

What is a 'Christian seeker?' Just curious, I see your religious status as such.
 
Upvote 0

Deidre32

Follow Thy Heart
Mar 23, 2014
3,926
2,438
Somewhere else...
✟82,366.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I'll keep you in my thoughts will also be fine.

Don't use the word prayer, because that will come across as snide.


eudaimonia,

Mark
When I first left Christianity, I felt that way about people who would say 'I'll pray for you,' etc. But, I remember when I said it as a believer. lol

I was just so snide!! :p Jk, I know what you're saying. :)

But, now it doesn't bother me. If people want to pray for me, that is okay. I don't need to be offended. The only thing I get somewhat offended by, is if someone tells others ''where'' they may end up after this life is over. No one knows. Even if you think you know, you don't know, for sure. Christianity never left me certain of things, only that I thought I was certain of things.
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,732
6,636
Massachusetts
✟654,559.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Don't use the word prayer, because that will come across as snide.
I think each atheist can speak for oneself, about if the word "prayer" would be "snide".
Yes, they can, but use the word prayer at your own risk. If you don't care about coming across as snide, go right ahead.
com7fy8 said:
And saying "prayer" can be included in our example, so an atheist can understand that we do not depend on and trust in ourselves, but we look to God for all that is truly good.
You should never use the death of an atheist's loved one as an excuse to proselytize. That is vulture-like behavior. It is the worst.
You might be speaking for how you would take it. If a person already knows me, that person can know where I'm coming from and if I am just into an ego thing of self-righteous proselytizing or if I really care about the person. If you assume that any and all people would be "snide" to say "prayer", I would say you do not know all these people so you could make a general statement like that :)

But it is good to make an issue of this, so we each prayerfully evaluate our real motives and if we are really being compassionate or just putting on a religious show so we can tell ourselves we are serving Jesus.

About how not every atheist might feel the same way about you mentioning prayer >
While this is true, in the specific moment of approaching someone who is grieving, is that an appropriate time, in your opinion, to take that chance?
Yes, we need to feel for others, not only subject everyone to a one-size-fits-all approach or rule about what to say or not to say :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cute Tink
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
You might be speaking for how you would take it.

I'd like to correct a sentence of mine to capture what I really intended.

"Don't use the word prayer, because that will may come across as snide."

It's not just my potential reaction. I'm not alone in this. But all I am really saying is that there is a serious risk with that approach. I don't insist that every atheist will react in precisely the same way.

My recommendation is that if you don't know how someone will react, err on the side of caution. If you know specifically that someone won't mind, go right ahead with confidence.

Is that reasonable?


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deidre32
Upvote 0

paulm50

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
1,253
110
✟2,061.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
It's difficult to tell Atheist anything of a spiritual nature, they generally have to discover the truth through experience and painful ego deflation or not.
Yes we require proof, not people telling us we have to believe to believe. As for painful ego deflation, when does that happen, not when you fail to prove anything.
Not every acorn becomes a tree, the gift of choice in the will of the children of God allows us to chose God or forsake him. Some people choose the doctrines of death.
An oak tree exists.

Every invisible acorn becomes an invisible oak tree in the mind of those who choose to believe it does.

The doctrine of death. I can prove death, so what else is there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deidre32
Upvote 0

MehGuy

A member of the less neotenous sex..
Site Supporter
Jul 23, 2007
56,283
11,035
Minnesota
✟1,362,844.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The most I can believe of an after life is humans developing the technology to bring back people from the dead.

I don't believe our essence is permanently gone when we die. It could easily never come back, but in theory I think it's possible to bring it back.

The thought comforts me at least, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deidre32
Upvote 0

GrowingSmaller

Muslm Humanist
Apr 18, 2010
7,424
346
✟56,999.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
I would say follow your heart and not your head. People can "reason" just about anything,
but what they "feel" about something is more often correct.
Long live Schleiermacher and his feeling of absolute dependence:

" This particular group of readers – the “Cultured Despisers of Religion” – are also, frequently, a part of the Romantic movement, which while despising religion was seeking alternative visions to the cold, mechanical facts and limitations of reason and empiricism. Into this arena Schleiermacher introduced his refreshingly new vision of religion as a feeling: “Religion is to seek this and find it in all that lives and moves, in all growth and change, in all doing and suffering. It is to have life and to know life in immediate feeling, only as such an existence in the Infinite and Eternal.” (On Religion, 36) He goes on to say: “…true religion is sense and taste for the Infinite.” "
^^
(source of quote)
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Heaven; the word, the description and the name conjure up a myriad of imaginings. Even though Jesus said nothing the mind of man can imagine will prepare anyone who arrives there for what they will experience. This musing is my own version of imagining heaven. I think it may prompt some thoughts.

First, let’s travel back before time existed. God, the Son and the Holy Spirit were all there was. The Spirit of God set creation into motion, and even though the bible isn’t clear on this, the angels were part of the first creation. Lucifer’s rebellion, which brought evil into God’s creation, not Eve’s original sin, placed a third of the angels into opposition with God. Creation was stained.

Consider the word, “creation”; it covers far more territory than this planet. The book of Revelation tells us of the creation of a new heaven (meaning the cosmos) and a new earth as one of the closing acts of the battle against sin. The size of the cosmos is beyond imagining and it is entirely possible that the actual size of creation is infinite, meaning without end in the literal sense.

When I was growing up the picture of heaven painted for me was the classic cliché of clouds, harps and cherubs. Guaranteed that is not what awaits us. Consider this; every positive attribute found in humanity is amplified in God to a power beyond number. One of those is the desire to share. How many parents find joy in showing their child new and wonderful things? How many children create a drawing, a craft or discover something fascinating and rush to show it off? It is the same with God. There are several passages where God is depicted as having a conversation where He is “showing off”. God is proud of his creation and rightly so and He is very interested in showing it to us.

Have you ever wanted to watch what goes on at the event horizon of a black hole up close and personal? Make sure you get to heaven. Have you ever wanted to explore galaxies? Jesus’ invitation to accept his sacrifice is your ticket. Heaven is eternal and the Bible indicates that the process of life multiplying will continue. An infinite cosmos as part of heaven, untainted by sin seems to be the most reasonable way of accommodating that expansion.

Speaking of life, it is not just possible but highly probable that every form of life, every species and subspecies that has been on this earth will be there. Playing fetch with a velociraptor could very easily be something to consider. Everything a good parent does with their child is something God wants to do with us.

However, being granted access to this new creation is not guaranteed, not if you haven’t made the arrangements. Jesus said more than once that the acceptance in his all-encompassing sacrifice is required. “Washed in his blood” is not just a countrified Southern Baptist song.

The following if a reprint, but it is an important one:

“All religions are the same. They believe in the same God as the Christians. A truly loving God would accept everybody.” Very few people want to hear that every one of the previous statements are not just wrong but horribly and quite probably eternally misleading. John 14:6 has this statement, “Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

By extension Jesus used the term, I Am several times and the translation from the Aramaic gives us the same phrase God used when telling Moses His name. A number of apologists attempt to de-deify Jesus by pointing out that he never came out and said, “I am God and you will worship me,” but this is pure equivocation since the earthly ministry of the man Jesus is entirely different than the position He was placed into upon ascension. In the bible there is are several places where God speaks of himself in both the singular and the plural. This link has many of the biblical references, http://www.evidencetobelieve.net/triune_god_in_the_scriptures.htm

http://www.letusreason.org/trin16.htm, is a web page where a good many of the scriptures show Jesus indicating that he is indeed God made flesh.

So where does that put us? It all goes back to what I have said many times before, the pathway into eternal life is open and free to all, it is the acceptance of the sacrifice of Jesus. A full understanding of that as far as the scriptures are concerned comes later. You do not need to be able to enter into a doctoral dissertation in order to be given salvation; you just have to accept that Jesus died on the cross for you, personally.

An awful lot of what went on behind the scenes of the crucifixion is really quite interesting. The Devil was actually conned into taking Jesus’ spirit, a third of the triune God, into hell…illegally. Because Jesus had met all the requirements of the law, the only man to ever do so, he was qualified for Heaven. By taking an innocent into Hell the Devil broke his contract with God thus allowing the creation of a new covenant, the acceptance of which became an act of free will on the behalf of the reborn believer.

This con would only have worked if Jesus had been God made flesh, not a mere prophet or a form of an angel, but a sinless being, a part of the creator of the universe. Believing in that, or more correctly, being willing to develop a belief in that is the only way to get to Heaven. You cannot get there just by accepting that Jesus was a prophet the same as Mohammed. You cannot get there by racking up an impressive list of charitable deeds or meditating on the universe and “being a good person”. Those who rely on Islam, Hinduism, Taoism, Wicca or any other form of religious activity will be eternally disappointed if they die without accepting Jesus as their savior.

Please understand this; no Christian has the right to declare that any one individual is going to Hell. God very clearly states that He is the final judge and He has every right to make the final decision. He made us, we did not make him. However, we do have the responsibility to point out the very clear fact that the door to Heaven opens to only one form of ID, that of the believer in Jesus’ eternal sacrifice.

Great synopsis! A person who honestly believes that Jesus died on the cross to take their sins away will be lead into all truth. It really is that simple. Plus, it would make sense that an all loving God would make Himself known in new ways overtime and eventually would make it so simple and easy to understand that only the very foolish, who do not seek truth, would be left unbelieving.
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Yes, but atheism isn't about ego, as many might assume. Not everyone is like Richard Dawkins. lol ;)

What is a 'Christian seeker?' Just curious, I see your religious status as such.

Christian seeker = I believe Jesus was what he said he was, I have found his teachings to be true, but the religion that Paul started about Jesus is a divergence from the original religion of Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Christian seeker = I believe Jesus was what he said he was, I have found his teachings to be true, but the religion that Paul started about Jesus is a divergence from the original religion of Jesus.
Logically, that would mean rejecting much of the New Testament as being divinely-inspired. To put it another way, either Paul's Epistles don't belong in the Bible or else the Bible isn't to be taken as being the Word of God.

What do you think?
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Yes we require proof, not people telling us we have to believe to believe. As for painful ego deflation, when does that happen, not when you fail to prove anything.
An oak tree exists.

Every invisible acorn becomes an invisible oak tree in the mind of those who choose to believe it does.

The doctrine of death. I can prove death, so what else is there?

Requiring proof is a cop out, besides, you cannot disprove the existence of God yet you have faith in that so??????
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
61
✟100,301.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Logically, that would mean rejecting much of the New Testament as being divinely-inspired. To put it another way, either Paul's Epistles don't belong in the Bible or else the Bible isn't to be taken as being the Word of God.

What do you think?

The theory that the Bible is the written Word of God is extra-biblical. Scripture fetish is a teaching common in all religions, an idea born among the shamans and priest in order to derive their authority as well as that of the social institution. . Most of the Bible books are retrospectives, written long after the events using a form of "preach-writing". In other words, the anscients, and even some people today, saw the hand of God in everything, won a war, lost a piece, good crops, bad crops etc. So that being their sincere belief, they wrote about history in the same way; God did this and that, God gave victory or defeat, God gave prosperity or famine.

Paul NEVER claimed his routine correspondence to others were the written Word of God. That is a creation of the Roman church in their reverence for Paul (the founder of their religion). The re-Sanhedrin church even considered it's own councils to be inerrant.
 
Upvote 0

Cute Tink

Blah
Site Supporter
Nov 22, 2002
19,570
4,622
✟147,891.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Requiring proof is a cop out, besides, you cannot disprove the existence of God yet you have faith in that so??????

Not all atheists have faith that there is no God, merely lack faith that there is. Subtle distinction, but important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eudaimonist
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Not all atheists have faith that there is no God, merely lack faith that there is. Subtle distinction, but important.
Wouldn't that make such a person an Agnostic? To be an Atheist generally means a decision has been made.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Wouldn't that make such a person an Agnostic? To be an Atheist generally means a decision has been made.

No, it doesn't. At least, that's not how atheists consider the matter.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
No, it doesn't. At least, that's not how atheists consider the matter.


eudaimonia,

Mark
Meaning, I'd think, that they're embarrassed about being thought to be Atheists.

A=without, Theist=believer in God. Sounds like what you've described, but I will accept your statement that they don't want to be identified with the term.

By the way, what would such Atheists say that the word "Agnostic" refers to, if not what they themselves believe??
 
Upvote 0

Cute Tink

Blah
Site Supporter
Nov 22, 2002
19,570
4,622
✟147,891.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
A = without, Theist = believer in God.

I am without belief in God.

But that isn't the same as I believe there is no God.

See the difference?

Agnostic usually referring to a lack of knowledge, which would mean I'm also agnostic.

A gnostic atheist would be someone who positively declares that there is no God.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
A = without, Theist = believer in God.

I am without belief in God.

But that isn't the same as I believe there is no God.

See the difference?
If you're without a belief in God, you believe that there is none. If you are unsure, you are Agnostic.

Agnostic usually referring to a lack of knowledge, which would mean I'm also agnostic.
That's what I would think. Because if you had knowledge of God you couldn't disbelieve, and there is no way of knowing that there is no God.

A gnostic atheist would be someone who positively declares that there is no God.
Why would the word "gnostic" be part of that? It seems superfluous, but more than that, it seems incorrect since "gnostic" derives from one who has knowledge, but it's not possible to "know" that there is no God, merely that you don't believe there is one (or several or many).
 
Upvote 0