Ok, that makes no sense whatsoever..
"I am the supreme infalliable leader, and all must listen to me"...is not dictatorship?
Actually Paul has more pull in Scripture than any of the 12 combined, but's that neither here nor there..also I seem to remember at the Council in Jerusalem in Acts, it was James who was "in charge", and was the one who spoke and stated what must be done.....but I do remember Peter speaking, and being rebuked by Paul...
13And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me:
14Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
15And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
16After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
17That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things.
18Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.
19Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
20But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
James was the leader here, as he was the Bishop of Jerusalem. Peter was not the infalliable supreme leader of the Church...