Wrong. And again on several levels.
Theories are overturned all of the time. All that is needed is evidence that the old theory has serious flaws and a new theory which is supported by clear evidence. So far the EU nuts have done neither of these. I freely call them nuts since they do what other nuts do, avoid the scientific method in their "science". Remember that going to the correct peer reviewed journals is only the first step in changing a scientific idea. If a group won't even do that you know their science is bad.
Second the Big Bang Theory was conceived after we knew that the Milky Way was not the only galaxy in the universe. It was formed by measuring how fast other galaxies were retreating from ours.
Tell me how they could have formed the BBT without that knowledge?
You just spout nonsense all the time don't you. Your BB theory is not even a scientific theory anymore, it is a religion. A religion that relies upon so many untestable Fairie Dust entities it's worse than creationism in that sense.
Big Bang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"
Georges Lemaître first proposed what became the Big Bang theory in what he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom". Over time, scientists built on his initial ideas to form the modern synthesis"
Georges Lemaître - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"He was the first person to propose the theory of the
expansion of the Universe, widely misattributed to
Edwin Hubble.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître#cite_note-3 He was also the first to derive what is now known as
Hubble's law and made the first estimation of what is now called the
Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble's article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître#cite_note-4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître#cite_note-5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître#cite_note-6http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître#cite_note-7 Lemaître also proposed what became known as the
Big Bang theory of the origin of the
Universe, which he called his 'hypothesis of the
primeval atom'."
Milky Way Galaxy: Facts About Our Galactic Home | Space.com
"As late as the 1920s, astronomers thought all of the stars in the universe were contained inside of the Milky Way. It wasn't until
Edwin Hubble discovered a special star known as a
Cepheid variable, which allowed him to precisely measure distances, that astronomers realized that the fuzzy patches once classified as nebula were actually separate galaxies."
But long before you had already settled on expansion due to the false belief that all red shift is caused by recession. Except when they got to be close to fractions of c, you decided that wasn't a good thing, so then along came an expanding spacetime composed of absolutely nothing. You got so much fairie Dust in your theories I am surprised you have the nerve say anythi9ng about creationists belief in unseen and undetectable things. Every single Fairie Dust entity in modern astronomy has never been observed in the laboratory. But everything we observe in space has been observed in the laboratory in relation to plasma, including redshift.
All you have a Fabricated Ad-hoc Inventions Repeatedly Invoked in Effort to Defend Untenable Scientific Theory. Fairie Dust. You have not one laboratory experiment to back up any of your supposed claims, while I can explain every single one by proven laboratory experiments with plasma, the 99% of the universe you and astronomers ignore.
Yes, you will accept extra dimensions, wormholes, neutron stars, dark matter and dark energy, WIMPS, WIMPZillas, strings, black holes, everything never once observed but you wont accept what we observe in space everyday. Electric currents and magnetic fields. You can't explain galactic rotation curves because you ignore what plasma is, an electrified medium and the electric force is 10^39 powers stronger than gravity, more than strong enough to account for these rotation curves with no extra mass needed. Just for you to quit ignoring plasma.
Only an idiot would ignore 99% of the universe and then postulate 96% Fairie Dust as an explanation for the 99% he ignored. You best get used to EU theory, because it is coming in whether you like it or not.
NASA - The Electric Atmosphere: Plasma Is Next NASA Science Target
NASA Mission Discovers Particle Accelerator in Heart of Van Allen Radiation Belts | NASA
And we all know how particle accelerators work don't we.
HowStuffWorks "Particle Accelerator"
"Most particle accelerators use electric fields to accelerate charged particles and magnetic fields to guide them. In general, the electric field can be set up to accelerate either negatively or positively charged particles, including particles of antimatter. A magnetic field exerts a force on moving charged particles in such a way that it acts at right angles to the direction in which the particles are moving. The strength of the magnetic field controls the degree to which the charged particles will curve as they move through the field. The magnetic field can thus be used to make charged particles move in a circular path while the electrical fields are used to boost the energy of the particle to higher and higher levels."
In reality they all use electric fields, even those that work by varying magnetic fields.
Magnetic field - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Similar to the way that a changing magnetic field generates an electric field, a changing electric field generates a magnetic field. This fact is known as
Maxwell's correction to Ampère's law. Maxwell's correction to Ampère's Law
bootstrap together with Faraday's law of induction to form
electromagnetic waves, such as light.
Thus, a changing electric field generates a changing magnetic field, which generates a changing electric field again."
If you could even justify your incorrect beliefs of magnetic fields you might have a prayer, but as it is modern Fairie Dust cosmology is dying a slow death, your astronomers just refuse to let go of their Fairie Dust because there is too much money and prestige looking for nothing, When nothing is found they simply ask for more money to keep looking for more nothing. 25 years the search for Dark Matter has been going, and not once detected.
