No, I'm not putting any constraints on the question whatever. You asked what "we" meant in the question, and I said pick whatever you like and state what your pick was when you answer the question.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What question? These two?
So let me get this straight --- you want to know why I know that you know the Bible is 100% accurate; and why you know that the KJV is the purest version?
I don't know why you know that --- you tell me.
Here is the Young Earth mindset at its finest. These images are from the Answers in Genesis' Museum which, we would assume, offers the best in Creation Science.
Vainglorious, I don't know how well you know me, but I can say, speaking from 19 months of experience here, and in my humble opinion, not one atheist or agnostic here is qualified to critique creationism. All you guys do is ask the same questions over and over; and despite numerous explanations and threads from me, you guys still don't have a clue as to where I'm coming from in explaining how God created this universe. I have never - (and I mean never) - in 19 months of solidly explaining myself over and over again - seen one person acknowledge what I'm talking about. Two of you have come close, but in just a short time, have reverted back to making subtle mistakes in trying to explain Genesis 1.
Believe me --- it takes the Holy Spirit to hammer the understanding home --- and some people are living proof of that.
What would make one qualified to critique creationism? Please be specific.
But you have no clue as to how ex nihilo creation works, anymore than you understand how "embedded" age works!An understanding of what really happened. Like how ex nihilo creation works, for starters.
People only bring up such things as a consequence of your statements about Genesis. So don't blame them.Then there's the fact that everyone wants to saunter outside of Genesis One, to critique what occurred inside of Genesis One, and you can't do that. For instance, claiming that God created this universe imperfect, or that He deceived people, those sorts of things.
Genesis never mentions Lucifer or Satan... and neither do any other books in the Old Testament. Why is that? Because he wasn't invented by the Jews until after the Old testament was written down. Why didn't the OT mention the Ice Age that supposedly followed the Flood? Because the human writers of the OT knew nothing about the Ice Age and had no divine revelation to inform them about it.Bringing up the Fall, the Flood, a "talking snake" - (it was neither "talking" nor a "snake"), Lucifer, Satan, the sons of God, sin, etc. doesn't cut it when discussing a one-time event that occurred only in Genesis 1.
What would make one qualified to critique creationism? Please be specific.
The problem with this statement is that Genesis 1 does not say that the Creation was perfect.Then there's the fact that everyone wants to saunter outside of Genesis One, to critique what occurred inside of Genesis One, and you can't do that. For instance, claiming that God created this universe imperfect.
and your veiws of the Frist 11 makes more sences why?
AV, when it comes to the accuracy of the bible, are you prepared to go to Genesis 2?
If the topic is the accuracy of the Bible, I'll be more than happy to go there; but if the topic is creationism, then I will not go there; and I would counsel others not to go there as well.
Sorry about the wording. How about; how do you know that the Bible is 100% literally true and the the KJV is the purest version of it? And as a bonus question, why should I believe you?What question? These two?
So let me get this straight --- you want to know why I know that you know the Bible is 100% accurate; and why you know that the KJV is the purest version?
I don't know why you know that --- you tell me.
An understanding of what really happened. Like how ex nihilo creation works, for starters. [...]
The bible itself is full of contradictions.
It's possible for something to contradict a particular part of the bible, but not the entire thing, in my opinion. Since i don't really see the bible as cohesive.
Just a quick question GreyCat,
do you think you would have been a 'Wiccan' if your parents had not been 'Wiccan'?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?