I do not believe I am committing this fallacy.
Let's review: You initially claimed that evolution was not good science.
I simply observed that if your claim were true, it would require us to believe something rather implausible - that thousands and thousands of experts have been guilty of doing "bad" science for decades and decades and decades. And we have solid reasons for believing this is not true - the people who have advanced the theory of evolution are highly trained experts.
If I were to say "evolution is true because most regular people believe it is", then I would be guilty of that fallacy.
But I am not saying that - I am saying it is clearly hard to believe that you are right in asserting that evolution is "bad" science, given that so many trained experts disagree with you.
There is a difference, albeit perhaps a tad subtle - the matter of relevant expertise.
Taking your line of reasoning one could defend oneself in court by saying this: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, if you believe those 100 ballistics experts who testified the deadly bullet came from my gun, you are committing the fallacy of consensus".
And that is clearly not right.