Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hey 46and2
Im waiting my dear
Just in case you forgot here is my last post to you
"Well... i disagree with much of what you said but hey im willing to be a fair sport. Lets start our own discussion and you can explain yourself in more detail. Would you like to start a fresh new discussion with me? How about you go on the offense? What have you got?"
its also true for any creature. we have no evidence that one kind of creature can evolve into something different. we only see variations of the same creature.
so a lots of sand grains +time =?You don't understand how lots of little changes can add up to a big change?
Ah, a straw man made of sand. That's a novelty.so a lots of sand grains +time =?
(image from Fun at the Florida Beaches - How To Build A Sand Sculpture - Florida Travel Sleuth)
so a lots of sand grains +time =?
(image from Fun at the Florida Beaches - How To Build A Sand Sculpture - Florida Travel Sleuth)
How can a process be non random?
Filtering what?
So why would you use a machine designed by human hand - created and designed to perform a task - as your example?
Its an example to show non-random behaviour using a machine that was designed and created.
Can you show me using an example of something which is non-random and not a created thing?
Your analogy so far cannot escape design
ie a coin machine created by human hand and designed to perform a process
This is supposed to show a non random process by comparing it to a designed process?
Well show me then? What have you got to prove your case?
I was never taught evolution at school.
Who is correct you or the authority on the subject which contradicts what you say? - remember that link you sent me?
"Bagemihl adds, however, that this is "necessarily an account of human interpretations of these phenomena".[7] Simon LeVay introduced caveat that "
[a]lthough homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities."
"Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity."
"[8]One species in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[9][10] "About 10% of rams (males), refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams."[10]"
Why did you send me that link if it contradicts what you are saying?
I refer you to the previous quotes from your page - you supplied me
Homosexual sex cannot result in reproduction show it is no use to the gene pool ie varitaions to pass on. Does that suggest from an evolutionary pov, homosexual is unnatural? Lets get into it? Give me details My dear that does not sound fair. You would leave me in the dark and not bring me to the light of your position. Im saddened!!! You have played chess with pidgeons? What a story. How about this one for youPsalms 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. What you think? Morality is made up of principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour. To be ethical, it is relating to moral principles or the branch of knowledge dealing with these. When we consider morality - which is the key word here - to reason right or wrong, a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning is needed. (.eg a statement or belief to compare an action to) Lets say i steal a small amount of money from you. You can reason to say i have made you a victim but i have not harmed you, i have not tricked you or injured you. We could suggest i have constructed a form of misfortune for you. We could suggest i took something from you without consent. How do you make a distinction for wrong behaviour and what principle serves for a chain of reasoning here? What is demonstrated everyday here? The power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgements logically. To use one's mind actively to form - interpret or view - considered decisions or come to sensible conclusions. Do you have no set principles or standard to compare a situation or behaviour to? What type or form of evidence would you require? Please be specific. So a comparison is still being made. There is an equal amount of objective evidence for both? I want you to show me how this is so? Give me an example of this? Do you know how to recognize evidence for God when you encounter it? What evidence do expect?
You disagreed with my explanation of what I meant in my argument. Unless you are able to read minds, seems like a pretty silly position to take.
Furthermore, if you can't even accept what my personal intent of my arguments is, what is the point of discussing anything at all with you?
Can I assume you've just given up?
self-organization mechanism. Biology does - it's called evolution.
Why isn't the pattern of genetic evidence of living creatures and the corresponding fossils of ancient transitionals evidence?Yes, I studied the theory from secondary school to university, and from what I gather there is sufficient evidence to show that it took place.
Often Creationists use different definitions to scientists, so to clarify, can you give an example of macro evolution that you think science proposes and you think is impossible?Microevolution occurs. Macroevolution does not.
Why isn't the pattern of genetic evidence of living creatures and the corresponding fossils of ancient transitionals evidence?
Often Creationists use different definitions to scientists, so to clarify, can you give an example of macro evolution that you think science proposes and you think is impossible?
@ralfyman said that there is sufficient evidence that evolution took place.Why isn't the pattern of genetic evidence of living creatures and the corresponding fossils of ancient transitionals evidence?
Often Creationists use different definitions to scientists, so to clarify, can you give an example of macro evolution that you think science proposes and you think is impossible?
Hey hey kylie
Wow you surprise me hahaha.
I thought we should have a break. Round 6. Where should we start?
Hey hey kylie my best atheist friend
Would you like to join a discussion @Speedwell @sfs @Subduction Zone - he is a bit loose but will be back on track soon - @In situ are in?
Would you like a reset or is there something in our past discussions you would like to focus on?
Ill be honest im over long replies right now!
You will also have to explain why it is impossible.Yes, I can.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?